What if the two people chosen to debate each other are in agreement?
What if the two people chosen to debate each other are in agreement?
Everyone in the first pool could their your type opinions to another member, giving each member in the list one type, and that person could match debaters based on people disagreeing on their lists. So if on her list Nemo put me as ESI and Gilly put me as EII, they could be matched to debate my type. If everyone agreed on the type of a person that person could be skipped.
“No psychologist should pretend to understand what he does not understand... Only fools and charlatans know everything and understand nothing.” -Anton Chekhov
http://kevan.org/johari?name=Bardia0
http://kevan.org/nohari?name=Bardia0
You can talk about me! (:
maybe a saint is just a dead prick with a good publicist
maybe tommorow's statues are insecure without their foes
go ask the frog what the scorpion knows
The Chooser should pick the person who demonstrates the clearest understanding of their type/gives the best/most convincing explanation.
But, for a certainty, back then,
We loved so many, yet hated so much,
We hurt others and were hurt ourselves...
Yet even then, we ran like the wind,
Whilst our laughter echoed,
Under cerulean skies...
oic, I literally posted again without confirming that I want to be in the first pool. My mistake, put me back in the second please.Originally Posted by Galen
No.
But, for a certainty, back then,
We loved so many, yet hated so much,
We hurt others and were hurt ourselves...
Yet even then, we ran like the wind,
Whilst our laughter echoed,
Under cerulean skies...
That would make it more complicated but its actually a good idea...the entertainment value would definitely decline if everyone just wound up agreeing, lol...
But, for a certainty, back then,
We loved so many, yet hated so much,
We hurt others and were hurt ourselves...
Yet even then, we ran like the wind,
Whilst our laughter echoed,
Under cerulean skies...
why
Posting Permissions
Reply With Quote