View Poll Results: Keanu Reeves's type

Voters
13. You may not vote on this poll
  • ILE (ENTp)

    0 0%
  • SEI (ISFp)

    0 0%
  • ESE (ESFj)

    0 0%
  • LII (INTj)

    1 7.69%
  • SLE (ESTp)

    0 0%
  • IEI (INFp)

    1 7.69%
  • EIE (ENFj)

    0 0%
  • LSI (ISTj)

    1 7.69%
  • SEE (ESFp)

    0 0%
  • ILI (INTp)

    0 0%
  • LIE (ENTj)

    0 0%
  • ESI (ISFj)

    0 0%
  • IEE (ENFp)

    6 46.15%
  • SLI (ISTp)

    2 15.38%
  • LSE (ESTj)

    0 0%
  • EII (INFj)

    2 15.38%
Multiple Choice Poll.
Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12
Results 41 to 70 of 70

Thread: Keanu Reeves

  1. #41
    Typometrics toska's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2019
    Location
    USA
    TIM
    EII-I-HD 4w5 sp/sx
    Posts
    246
    Mentioned
    12 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default



    Keanu has remained very consistent with his interests and has no desire to change up his style by himself. He refers to himself as boring and dry. Very relaxed, calm, and introverted. He's so IP that he's probably Harmonic. Known as being the most 'down-to-earth'. Spends his days very sheltered, working on his motorcycle or playing his guitar. On set he has a reputation as a workaholic and perfectionist who keeps to himself. Described as having a strong 'kinesthetic sense'. Learned to do all his own stunts. He's able to achieve being simultaneously seen as tough and sweet. I see him as a very kind, generous, and practical caregiver who has acquired a lot of technical expertise.

    "I've worked with him for a year and a couple of months, but I don't really know him that much," says LaBeouf.

    "I don't think he hangs out with other humans that much." says Lawrence: "Do I really know Keanu after working with him? No. I know things about him: he's hardworking, he's generous, he's a sweet, sweet guy. But it's all just sort of on the surface."

    Erwin Stoff, Reeves' manager and a producer on the movie, has known the actor since he was 13, and even he's still guessing. "Keanu is a really private person," Stoff says. "He's sort of perfected for himself a way of keeping a distance from people."

    Hence, SLI-Si.
    Last edited by toska; 11-27-2019 at 06:49 PM.

    EII-2Ne
    | Harmonic > Dominant | INFJ | The Researcher | 4w5-1w9-5w4 | sp/sx
    "Everything comes and goes, pleasure moves on too early and trouble leaves too slow."

  2. #42

    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Posts
    11,347
    Mentioned
    1036 Post(s)
    Tagged
    3 Thread(s)

    Default

    INTJ

    Quote Originally Posted by toska View Post
    Keanu has remained very constant and has no desire to change up his style.
    J

    > He refers to himself as boring and dry.

    T

    > Very relaxed, calm, and introverted.

    I

    > Known as being the most 'down-to-earth'. Spends his days very sheltered, working on his motorcycle or playing his guitar.

    stable limited interests to a motorcycle and a guitar of so "down-to-earth" life

    > On set he has a reputation as a workaholic and perfectionist who keeps to himself.

    more for J. P are flexible to often take easier the duties

    > He's able to achieve being simultaneously seen as tough and sweet.

    a tough and down-to-earth









    etc

    this "tough" is evident N
    Last edited by Sol; 11-24-2019 at 08:34 PM.
    Types examples: video bloggers, actors

  3. #43
    Dark Rainbow bouncingoffclouds's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2019
    Location
    Psychedelic Dream Castle in Outer Space
    TIM
    IEE-Fi-H, E4 sx/so
    Posts
    880
    Mentioned
    31 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Yeah I feel certain on E9, which apparently isn’t too common for IEE
    "I am my own muse. I am the subject I know best, the subject I want to know better."
    4 core, sx/so slight sx bend, xNFp Melancholic, Negotiator, Explorer




  4. #44
    Dark Rainbow bouncingoffclouds's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2019
    Location
    Psychedelic Dream Castle in Outer Space
    TIM
    IEE-Fi-H, E4 sx/so
    Posts
    880
    Mentioned
    31 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    what a guy
    Quote Originally Posted by toska View Post


    Keanu has remained very constant and has no desire to change up his style. He refers to himself as boring and dry. Very relaxed, calm, and introverted. He's so IP that he's probably Harmonic. Known as being the most 'down-to-earth'. Spends his days very sheltered, working on his motorcycle or playing his guitar. On set he has a reputation as a workaholic and perfectionist who keeps to himself. Described as having a strong 'kinesthetic sense'. Learned to do all his own stunts. He's able to achieve being simultaneously seen as tough and sweet. I see him as a very kind, generous, and practical caregiver who has acquired a lot of technical expertise.

    "I've worked with him for a year and a couple of months, but I don't really know him that much," says LaBeouf.

    "I don't think he hangs out with other humans that much." says Lawrence: "Do I really know Keanu after working with him? No. I know things about him: he's hardworking, he's generous, he's a sweet, sweet guy. But it's all just sort of on the surface."

    Erwin Stoff, Reeves' manager and a producer on the movie, has known the actor since he was 13, and even he's still guessing. "Keanu is a really private person," Stoff says. "He's sort of perfected for himself a way of keeping a distance from people."

    Hence, SLI-Si.
    "I am my own muse. I am the subject I know best, the subject I want to know better."
    4 core, sx/so slight sx bend, xNFp Melancholic, Negotiator, Explorer




  5. #45
    Tommy's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2017
    TIM
    ISTp-0 D sx/sp
    Posts
    2,751
    Mentioned
    331 Post(s)
    Tagged
    2 Thread(s)

    Default

    Ppl who types him as IEE have absolutely no clue what 4DFe is.


  6. #46
    myresearch's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2018
    TIM
    LII-Ne
    Posts
    317
    Mentioned
    28 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Tommy View Post
    Ppl who types him as IEE have absolutely no clue what 4DFe is.

    Have you typed him? If you haven't, could you share the most probable type that you think for him?

  7. #47
    Tommy's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2017
    TIM
    ISTp-0 D sx/sp
    Posts
    2,751
    Mentioned
    331 Post(s)
    Tagged
    2 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by myresearch View Post
    Have you typed him? If you haven't, could you share the most probable type that you think for him?
    I posted my typing for him above. Imo, ILI, SLI is another possibility as some say, but I think he's more intuitive, he's very aware of time.

  8. #48
    myresearch's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2018
    TIM
    LII-Ne
    Posts
    317
    Mentioned
    28 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Tommy View Post
    I posted my typing for him above. Imo, ILI, SLI is another possibility as some say, but I think he's more intuitive, he's very aware of time.
    Sorry, I missed your previous post although I have looked for it, damn 1D Se. I think Keanue is definitely Si/Ne valuer.

  9. #49
    Marep's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2019
    TIM
    H-EII Sx/Sp E9w1
    Posts
    339
    Mentioned
    4 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Tommy View Post
    Ppl who types him as IEE have absolutely no clue what 4DFe is.

    Honestly, I see no signs of Fe polr for him to be *LI.

    https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=rOqUiXhECos

  10. #50
    Tommy's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2017
    TIM
    ISTp-0 D sx/sp
    Posts
    2,751
    Mentioned
    331 Post(s)
    Tagged
    2 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Marep View Post
    Honestly, I see no signs of Fe polr for him to be *LI.

    https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=rOqUiXhECos
    Just compare Graham Norton (4DFe) with Reeves, do you seem them both equally able to be openly emotional and expressive? I don't.


  11. #51
    Tommy's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2017
    TIM
    ISTp-0 D sx/sp
    Posts
    2,751
    Mentioned
    331 Post(s)
    Tagged
    2 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by myresearch View Post
    Sorry, I missed your previous post although I have looked for it, damn 1D Se.
    no prob, lol

    I think Keanue is definitely Si/Ne valuer.
    why?

  12. #52
    Marep's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2019
    TIM
    H-EII Sx/Sp E9w1
    Posts
    339
    Mentioned
    4 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Tommy View Post
    Just compare Graham Norton (4DFe) with Reeves, do you seem them both equally able to be openly emotional and expressive? I don't.

    Different stackings/subtypes

  13. #53
    Tommy's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2017
    TIM
    ISTp-0 D sx/sp
    Posts
    2,751
    Mentioned
    331 Post(s)
    Tagged
    2 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Marep View Post
    Different stackings/subtypes


    here another example of Fi valuer with 4DFe and Fi subtype probably.


  14. #54
    Marep's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2019
    TIM
    H-EII Sx/Sp E9w1
    Posts
    339
    Mentioned
    4 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Tommy View Post
    Yep, just like Will Smith VS Donald Trump. Both are SEEs, but it's so evident the difference in temperament. Being the same type doesn't mean having the same personality or in this case the exact same level of expressiveness/emotionality.

  15. #55
    Tommy's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2017
    TIM
    ISTp-0 D sx/sp
    Posts
    2,751
    Mentioned
    331 Post(s)
    Tagged
    2 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Marep View Post
    Yep, just like Will Smith VS Donald Trump. Both are SEEs, but it's so evident the difference in temperament. Being the same type doesn't mean having the same personality or in this case the exact same level of expressiveness/emotionality.
    I don't think Will is SEE. I think Will is either alpha or delta, most likely ESE https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BgrrNvZCH7Y

    And yes, it does, that's why we say "having the same personality type" ...also again, yes it does, that's what model A suggest at least. I think you are just typing ppl randomly (based on I don't know what) without any base in theory. DCNH doesn't turn a 4DFe into 1DFe.

  16. #56
    Marep's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2019
    TIM
    H-EII Sx/Sp E9w1
    Posts
    339
    Mentioned
    4 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Tommy View Post
    I think you are just typing ppl randomly (based on I don't know what) without any base in theory.
    That's what you think, and I respect that.

    Peace

  17. #57
    Tommy's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2017
    TIM
    ISTp-0 D sx/sp
    Posts
    2,751
    Mentioned
    331 Post(s)
    Tagged
    2 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Marep View Post
    That's what you think, and I respect that.

    Peace
    same

  18. #58

    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Posts
    11,347
    Mentioned
    1036 Post(s)
    Tagged
    3 Thread(s)

    Default

    Jesse Rutherford - mb INTP
    Will Smith - ENTP
    Donald Trump - ENFJ

    Quote Originally Posted by Marep View Post
    I respect that.
    Recently you shaw inadequate negative emotions on reasonable criticism about your and other noobs objective lack of skills and doubtful opinions. You do not care much about morality or feelings of people. You are inadequately rude one. You seem as highly possible T-I type.

    You do not tolerate or respect such situations and made above evident wrong claim about yourself. You value too much your doubtful and incompetent mind speculations, having low emotionality and compassion to people.

    What is for sure, you overesteemate own typing skills, use too seriously doubtful and heretic parts of the theory, use low quality typing data and have rather high speculativity in its interpretations. You even claim as facts those your speculations. This and your highly possible own mistyping to F type prevent to understand the types correctly, reduce your accuracy. Which could not be good anyway as it's generally low and especially at noobs like you.

    toska has most probably T type too. this makes his mistyping of that base T to F is more than average possible and this mistake is widely spreaded in his types examples.

    you both are just noobs which recently tried to understand own types and failed still. then you want to identify types of famouses what is too hard for you in many cases. it's also hard for you to get that about famouses you have no good typing info except nonverbal. you play too freely with your speculations, whithout having even basic typing skills and own type's understanding.
    I'm sure you get a mess with IR theory with people near you or did not checked them in enough quantity. That would be enough to train your typing skills more before posting your revelations. But you want to flood and play in types, alike most noobs on forums. So you are predisposed to post a lot of funny mistypings or to show a redundant conformism, to say theoretical nonsense and to use random bs instead of normal theory.

    > Honestly, I see no signs of Fe polr for him to be *LI.

    you may notice weak/strong and sometimes valued/nonvalued traits of functions, but doubtful for more. the more is your speculative dreams

    Quote Originally Posted by Marep View Post
    Different stackings/subtypes
    argument in the form of muddy baseless bs, and what is not Socionics
    the example, when random bs hypotheses are used to rationalize opinions and often mistakes

    you've studed for all idiocy what noobs do in his forum. read too much of Fe types flood. own stubborn mistyping. hysterics, inappropriate usage of theory and data, baseless heresies, some conformism instead of reasonable approach. you've adopted to the forum, but the opposite did with your reason and appropriate typology usage

    Quote Originally Posted by Tommy View Post
    same
    and you are not honest in this too taking your past sabotage of peoples typing by which you fantasied that protect some noob's mistake in own type

    you both are not enough reasonable and moral for other. to evaluate correctly the weight of your and others' opinions about types and to act accordingly here

    -
    resume

    to the current moment the strong mistyping did by
    Anglas, bouncingoffclouds, lynn, Marep, silke, toska, Samuel Leopold, voider

    the most of them are recent noobs. many seem to mistype themselves (anglas, bouncingoffclouds, marep, voider)
    Last edited by Sol; 11-27-2019 at 03:22 PM.
    Types examples: video bloggers, actors

  19. #59
    Typometrics toska's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2019
    Location
    USA
    TIM
    EII-I-HD 4w5 sp/sx
    Posts
    246
    Mentioned
    12 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Sol View Post
    Jesse Rutherford - mb INTP
    Will Smith - ENTP
    Donald Trump - ENFJ



    Recently you shaw inadequate negative emotions on reasonable criticism about your and other noobs objective lack of skills and doubtful opinions. You do not care much about morality or feelings of people. You are inadequately rude one. You seem as highly possible T-I type.

    You do not tolerate or respect such situations and made above evident wrong claim about yourself. You value too much your doubtful and incompetent mind speculations, having low emotionality and compassion to people.

    What is for sure, you overesteemate own typing skills, use too seriously doubtful and heretic parts of the theory, use low quality typing data and have rather high speculativity in its interpretations. You even claim as facts those your speculations. This and your highly possible own mistyping to F type prevent to understand the types correctly, reduce your accuracy. Which could not be good anyway as it's generally low and especially at noobs like you.

    toska has most probably T type too. this makes his mistyping of that base T to F is more than average possible and this mistake is widely spreaded in his types examples.

    you both are just noobs which recently tried to understand own types and failed still. then you want to identify types of famouses what is too hard for you in many cases. it's also hard for you to get that about famouses you have no good typing info except nonverbal. you play too freely with your speculations, whithout having even basic typing skills and own type's understanding.
    I'm sure you get a mess with IR theory with people near you or did not checked them in enough quantity. That would be enough to train your typing skills more before posting your revelations. But you want to flood and play in types, alike most noobs on forums. So you are predisposed to post a lot of funny mistypings or to show a redundant conformism, to say theoretical nonsense and to use random bs instead of normal theory.

    > Honestly, I see no signs of Fe polr for him to be *LI.

    you may notice weak/strong and sometimes valued/nonvalued traits of functions, but doubtful for more. the more is your speculative dreams



    argument in the form of muddy baseless bs, and what is not Socionics
    the example, when random bs hypotheses are used to rationalize opinions and often mistakes

    you've studed for all idiocy what noobs do in his forum. read too much of Fe types flood. own stubborn mistyping. hysterics, inappropriate usage of theory and data, baseless heresies, some conformism instead of reasonable approach. you've adopted to the forum, but the opposite did with your reason and appropriate typology usage



    and you are not honest in this too taking your past sabotage of peoples typing by which you fantasied that protect some noob's mistake in own type

    you both are not enough reasonable and moral for other. to evaluate correctly the weight of your and others' opinions about types and to act accordingly here

    -
    resume

    to the current moment the strong mistyping did by
    Anglas, bouncingoffclouds, lynn, Marep, silke, toska, Samuel Leopold, voider

    the most of them are recent noobs. many seem to mistype themselves (anglas, bouncingoffclouds, marep, voider)
    Sol, please relax. I've only inquired to understand your method of typing better but you've never explained yourself clearly enough. Just because you perceive someone being rude over the internet doesn't make them a logical type. If your instinct is to attack everyone, it doesn't help anything. You say I conform with my typing and if this is the case then why would judging my gallery based on IR be a credible way of typing me? You type based on a method you personally conceived which is really risky. I'll often see you make superficial diagnostics based on things like a profile picture. I'm curious why judging a persons character has become assessed based on so little about their actual character. Objectively speaking, wouldn't it be best to see that your method can be verified before pursuing it as the absolute truth? I want to speak to the people who can attest to this process because if I'm a 'noob' then surely there are others you'd deem as 'experts'. Heck, I'm sure you'd probably call Gulenko a 'noob' as well.

    EII-2Ne
    | Harmonic > Dominant | INFJ | The Researcher | 4w5-1w9-5w4 | sp/sx
    "Everything comes and goes, pleasure moves on too early and trouble leaves too slow."

  20. #60

    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Posts
    11,347
    Mentioned
    1036 Post(s)
    Tagged
    3 Thread(s)

    Default

    among 12 votes, for the correct type INTJ is only mine
    much because you typed by random bla-bla-bla, while the most quality data about any famous is nonverbal

    someone said something and that is taken as a fact. while that is far not so. and you don't know the context. you have doubtful claims about what you may only to guess - you can't evaluate the weight of those claims. including because of weak types understanding as typing needs a training and practice of watching people - you have no this, it may take years and many people typed by you. you have much filtered, distorted and limited data - and by that you are trying to suppose the type.
    you are also easily misleaded by "public image" as happens with those who see Putin as LSI. you are under impressions from roles an actor did. you have a lot of mess about famouses and the hard lack of important data for the typing

    use nonverbal as primary method for famouses and people about which you know a few
    also forget about heretic bs as subtypes and doubtful muddy parts of the normal theory
    this approach will give the best accuracy you may to have

    unreasonable noobs...
    Types examples: video bloggers, actors

  21. #61
    Typometrics toska's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2019
    Location
    USA
    TIM
    EII-I-HD 4w5 sp/sx
    Posts
    246
    Mentioned
    12 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Sol View Post
    much because you typed by random bla-bla-bla, while the most quality data about any famous is nonverbal.
    Show your sources for this 'quality data'. Open the floodgates.

    EII-2Ne
    | Harmonic > Dominant | INFJ | The Researcher | 4w5-1w9-5w4 | sp/sx
    "Everything comes and goes, pleasure moves on too early and trouble leaves too slow."

  22. #62

    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Posts
    11,347
    Mentioned
    1036 Post(s)
    Tagged
    3 Thread(s)

    Default

    it's IEE. Nikulin


    another one


    you have the impressions about these clowns
    now compare them with the impressions goten from Reeves
    ENFP and INTJ are very different types. and you may feel the traits of these types from people directly, just by watching how they talk, look at you, how they move
    just use this
    Types examples: video bloggers, actors

  23. #63
    COOL AND MANLY's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2011
    TIM
    Your daul
    Posts
    1,078
    Mentioned
    30 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Sol View Post
    among 12 votes, for the correct type INTJ is only mine
    much because you typed by random bla-bla-bla, while the most quality data about any famous is nonverbal

    someone said something and that is taken as a fact. while that is far not so. and you don't know the context. you have doubtful claims about what you may only to guess - you can't evaluate the weight of those claims. including because of weak types understanding as typing needs a training and practice of watching people - you have no this, it may take years and many people typed by you. you have much filtered, distorted and limited data - and by that you are trying to suppose the type.
    you are also easily misleaded by "public image" as happens with those who see Putin as LSI. you are under impressions from roles an actor did. you have a lot of mess about famouses and the hard lack of important data for the typing

    use nonverbal as primary method for famouses and people about which you know a few
    also forget about heretic bs as subtypes and doubtful muddy parts of the normal theory
    this approach will give the best accuracy you may to have

    unreasonable noobs...
    I type him LII as well. But I admit it's an odd typing.

    I think if you go by stereotypes you would never type him as such.

  24. #64
    a two horned unicorn renegade Heretic 007's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2015
    Location
    Sol's emo club
    TIM
    ILE-C-I
    Posts
    4,843
    Mentioned
    209 Post(s)
    Tagged
    2 Thread(s)

    Default

    His naturalistic tendencies makes me leans towards SLI very heavily. ILI's are more comfortable recharging themselves in "a closet" as being dialectical types and having self talk.

    He displays lots of Vortical Synergistic themes (being in sync with nature, yes even LIE's are like this) overall if you ask me.
    Measuring you right now

  25. #65
    Typometrics toska's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2019
    Location
    USA
    TIM
    EII-I-HD 4w5 sp/sx
    Posts
    246
    Mentioned
    12 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Sol View Post
    ENFP and INTJ are very different types. and you may feel the traits of these types from people directly, just by watching how they talk, look at you, how they move
    just use this
    I type Reeves SLI, not IEE. Are you going to show your 'quality data' or not?

    EII-2Ne
    | Harmonic > Dominant | INFJ | The Researcher | 4w5-1w9-5w4 | sp/sx
    "Everything comes and goes, pleasure moves on too early and trouble leaves too slow."

  26. #66
    MegaDoodoo's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2019
    Posts
    159
    Mentioned
    1 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Whatever his type really is, he's had a lot of personal loss in his life. Sad Keanu comes to mind. I think that accentuates his Ni/Si to some extent, regardless of his actual type. I'm not sure what that makes him, but I wonder if that has something to do with why he's so nice. Like he just doesn't see the value in not getting along with people.

    He definitely seems enneagram 9 at least. But enneagram 9 does seem more related to emotional trauma.
    Does absolutely nothing, then dies.

  27. #67
    2real Remiel's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2013
    Location
    Can'-Ka No Rey
    TIM
    Se-ILI 468 sx/sp
    Posts
    1,964
    Mentioned
    77 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Leave him alone! - Ben Kissel
    "The society that separates its scholars from its warriors will have its thinking done by cowards and its fighting by fools." ―Thucydides



  28. #68
    myresearch's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2018
    TIM
    LII-Ne
    Posts
    317
    Mentioned
    28 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Tommy View Post
    no prob, lol



    why?
    Se is focused on concrete reality, concrete attributes of an object or subject are emphasized. Se use immediate influence to change an object/subject at that moment. Ni tracks the general patterns of a concrete object/subject in order to gauge how to change the course of events (dynamic), Ni emphasize only necessary concrete attributes to accomplish that. Si is focused on its impressions caused by object's/subject's attributes, its impressions are not readily visible in concrete reality such as things that can't be seen, heard etc. Si emphasize their impressions caused by an object/subject in reality more than concrete attributes of an object/subject. Si establish homeostasis gained from the knowledge of gathered impression. Ne is interested in propensities, hence Ne gathers information from different types of objects/subjects in order to find out its propensities. Ne emphasize potential of reality and analogies assessed by accumulated information from a wide variety of samples.

    Se/Ni sounds more deliberate even when they are less deliberate because of the focus of concrete reality. Se/Ni aims to establish a presence or foundation to alter the events in the moment or future. Si/Ne sounds more attentive even when they are less attentive because of focus on impression and perspectives. Si/Ne aims to establish comfort or freedom so impressions and propensities could flourish and revive.

    Keanu Reeves has no emphasize on deliberateness. He showed very little influence considering the influence that he might have due to being a celebrity. He generally seems attentive, during the video you share, he generally open up a space for other guests to talk rather than emphasizing his part. Some of his interviews seems like a conversation or monologues, he has no interest in illustrating a presence or make himself seem powerful as he is or more than he is. For example, on his time remains unchanged video, every thing he says over and over again is processed in terms of impressions and propensities.

  29. #69

    Join Date
    Oct 2013
    TIM
    Posts
    827
    Mentioned
    40 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    The issue that he doesn't show enough Fe for IEE can be solved if he simply is EII and has Fe ignoring. The way I see it: introvert, intuitive should be clear. Rational should also be clear. Ethical a bit less so, just because he seems so unemotional, but EII's are often like that, sort of ascetics.

  30. #70
    soundofconfusion's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2019
    Location
    Berlin
    TIM
    LII/creative subtype
    Posts
    757
    Mentioned
    32 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by mclane View Post
    The issue that he doesn't show enough Fe for IEE can be solved if he simply is EII and has Fe ignoring. The way I see it: introvert, intuitive should be clear. Rational should also be clear. Ethical a bit less so, just because he seems so unemotional, but EII's are often like that, sort of ascetics.
    I watched a couple of interviews in the last few days and yeah, I came to the exact same conclusion. seems very introverted and intuitive, also rational, so I'm debating between EII and LII atm. in some interviews he shows quite a lot of skills in dealing with other people, and as an LII, I actually don't know if many people would say so many positive things about me, so I'm leaning more towards EII for now. he also does some interviews that I personally wouldn't do as an LII, like this one for buzzfeed where he plays with dogs.

    https://youtu.be/rOqUiXhECos
    my gallery of types:

    http://soziotypen.de/bekannte-persoenlichkeiten/

    _____________________________________________

    https://rateyourmusic.com/~soundofconfusion

Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •