Just a general thing. Statistics and personal experience would help.
This question feels like deja vu.
I say ESFj or ESTj probably.
The SF/T's are clearly outnumbered by NT/F's. I don't know if it's lack of interest or they're not as inclined to even find out about abstract theories. Come to think of it, maybe ESI? I get the feeling they're too cool for this stuff, out somewhere having a drink up with their close circle of friends.
Socionics is a heavily Alpha NT theory, so it's likely that Gamma SFs would be least inclined to be interested in it. The the16types' user self-typings correlate fairly well: http://wikisocion.org/en/index.php?t...ma/selftypings
Quaero Veritas.
Ne-PoLRs
The type who tends to not like things/judgements defining who they are into categories, Delta types, in general. They like to be seen as individuals.
-
Dual type(as per tcaudilllg)
Enneagram 2w1sw(1w9) helps others to live up to their own standards of what a good person is and is very behind the scenes in the process.
Tritype 1-2-6 stacking sp/sx
I'm constantly looking to align the real with the ideal.I've been more oriented toward being overly idealistic by expecting the real to match the ideal. My thinking side is dominent. The result is that sometimes I can be overly impersonal or self-centered in my approach, not being understanding of others in the process and simply thinking "you should do this" or "everyone should follor this rule"..."regardless of how they feel or where they're coming from"which just isn't a good attitude to have. It is a way, though, to give oneself an artificial sense of self-justification. LSE
Best description of functions:
http://socionicsstudy.blogspot.com/2...functions.html
-
Dual type(as per tcaudilllg)
Enneagram 2w1sw(1w9) helps others to live up to their own standards of what a good person is and is very behind the scenes in the process.
Tritype 1-2-6 stacking sp/sx
I'm constantly looking to align the real with the ideal.I've been more oriented toward being overly idealistic by expecting the real to match the ideal. My thinking side is dominent. The result is that sometimes I can be overly impersonal or self-centered in my approach, not being understanding of others in the process and simply thinking "you should do this" or "everyone should follor this rule"..."regardless of how they feel or where they're coming from"which just isn't a good attitude to have. It is a way, though, to give oneself an artificial sense of self-justification. LSE
Best description of functions:
http://socionicsstudy.blogspot.com/2...functions.html