ENTjs, ESTjs and INTps argue that aggressively and blunt. But other Te valuers don't seem to. ENFps/ISTps/ESFp/ISFj all just seem too... idk what's a good word for it, ?victimy? for that style of arguing, and I don't think you yourself 'straight forward attack' anybody. Victimy sounds too harsh but I don't know how else to say it.
I guess my point is , that I agree with you, but it depends on where Te is in the psyche. That largely seems to be like a Te-ego/Te-creative thing rather than something that is purely Te-valuing.
And often, I will think I'm being direct and blunt as hell, but I am a gay guy whose name is in pink. That is bound to make other people think that I can't be precise and direct, I guess. =p




Do you know what Te-POLR is? Do you realize she wasn't JUST telling details about her visit with Gilly, but that everything was a sub-argument to her overall point, her THREAD TITLE, that Gilly is Ti ESTp?
It was a response to the statement I had quoted.

"Yes, it will be done."