Article: DCNH: System of DCNH Subtypes by Viktor Gulenko

[xerx]

You can view the page at http://www.the16types.info/vbulletin...-DCNH-Subtypes

[carrina]

Some things that aren't clearly defined here:

"First dichotomy: contact/distance.

The first pole indicates the predominance of the need for contact, and the second the need to maintain distance (psycological or physical? This is mostly undefined). Into the contact category will fall clearly expressed extroverts as well as extroverted introverts (obvious typing pitfall). Distant will be clearly expressed introverts, but also introverted extroverts – those extroverts who avoid intensive contact (intensive contact is undefined). The scale of vertness is thus split into four gradations(what gradiations?)".

Second dichotomy: terminating/initiating.

I understand terminating as the ability to finish what was started and a tendency towards regulation. Initiating, as the opposite tendency to initiate and to easily move on to something else, with corresponding disorder in matters and affairs. As you see, these are the concrete definitions of the usual dichotomy rationality/irrationality. It would be incorrect to think that in the house of any rational reigns pristine order, that it clearly plans all, and that all irrationals throw everything to the side and are burdened by planning. In reality, two intervening gradations are frequently encountered between these extreme poles.

In the terminating pole belong clearly expressed rationals and orderly irrationals. Initiating behavior is possessed by clearly expressed irrationals and disorderly rationals.
This dichotomy is the only one that is clear after explanation.

And the third additional dichotomy is connecting/ignoring.

The level of sensitivity to changes in the environment is assumed to be the basis of this scale. Connectors are very sensitive to such changes (does sensitive here mean "aware of" or more of a synonym to "touchy"?), whereas ignorers, as the name suggests, are capable of turning no attention towards this.

[Ben Vaserlan]

A new video which includes DCNH discussion at roughly around 40 mins. it happens as soon as Laura arrives. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IRlK...I73QsyCbeoClv6

[Ben Vaserlan]

A trilogy of DCNH videos (with Dr G) are in this playlist. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MrVZ...jAODE&index=12

[The Reality Denialist]

A trilogy of DCNH videos (with Dr G) are in this playlist. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MrVZ...jAODE&index=12

Are there any comments by Gulenko regarding these empirical portraits?
http://wikisocion.net/en/index.php?t..._Vera_Borisova
I mean if I have understood correctly Gulenko's functional states are not purely empirically decipherable (works more in metaphorical context) but Borisova's take on on ego and super ego blocks is. D (base), C (creative), N (role) and H (PoLR).