How about you?but, I just don't feel like I require internal coherence
How about you?but, I just don't feel like I require internal coherence
Can you clarify what you mean by that?
For me, internal coherence is almost always secondary to external effectiveness. Any mental systems I have, if they exist, are generally loose, analog, localized, and ever-shifting...
p . . . a . . . n . . . d . . . o . . . r . . . a
trad metalz | (more coming)
meh. i was going to vote i did relate but then i was waiting for you to elaborate first to be sure.
it doesnt ring any bells for me anyway. sometimes i think making things more coherent makes them less true. but other times things feel "off" somehow and it comes back to them not fitting together coherently. so i think its more of a tool than a need, if that makes sense.
I NEED internal coherence. I absolutely have to have it. Thankfully, I almost always do have it.
I generally don't even think about the world as such. If it works, it works. Oftentimes, things have to be coherent in order to work, so internal coherence can definitely be useful.
Obsequium amicos, veritas odium parit
(i)NTFS
An ILI at rest tends to remain at rest
and an ILI in motion is probably not an ILI
♫ 31.9FM KICE Radio ♫ *56K Warning*
My work on Inert/Contact subtypes
Socionics Visual Identification(V.I.) Database
Socionics Tests Database
Comprehensive List of Socionics Sites
Fidei Defensor