
Originally Posted by
Donkey Eternal
Drogo
Beta. Very strong Se. Capable of and enjoys Fe, but has only demonstrated it powerfully on one occasion. Loves Dany, an EIE. Points to SLE-Se. It seems everyone agrees.
Ramsay
My first impression was 'oh, another EIE', but I now think he's SEE. Hear me out. He reeks of Fe [lol, pun not intended], but he uses it playfully and non-seriously. I'm not saying this negates the typing of EIE, but it opens up the possibility of SEE since Fe demonstrative can manifest in that form. Something that really differentiates Ramsay from the EIEs in this show is that he's really good at Se, which he clearly values. Se manifests itself differently in him than the EIEs. He's fearless and revels in the violance of personal combat. He's unpredictable and arrogant, ignoring possible ways his plans could go wrong. He thinks on his feet, but is reckless when it comes to political consequences. He also respects and heeds the words of his father, Roose, a Gamma NT. Of course, he's a fucking sadist, but overall I think he's an SEE-Fi.
Cersei
Emotionally manipulative and sees through the character of others e.g Margaery. Points to skill in ethics. She's too often typed logical without reason. Being cold and distrusting does not equal a logical type. Strong and valued Se. Se's strength negates the possibility of IEI, leaving EIE, SEE or ESI. She is extremely impatient and short-sighted. This removes EIE. She's mistrustful, vengeful and definitely a Gamma SF, but her mercurial, amoral nature and bias towards her children is more SEE than ESI. I don't even like her that much, but she is what she is, an SEE-Se. This also explains her and Jaime's [LIE] mostly positive relationship, as well as her being supervised by Tywin, an LSI.
Baelish
Also emotionally manipulative, so you'd think ethical, but no one actually trusts him, so his manipulation doesn't exactly work that well. You could argue that most people don't trust other ethical characters like Cersei either, but there are other reasons I typed them ethical, whereas Littlefinger only has his false niceness and dramatic speeches going for him, which isn't much. I think he's LIE-Ni. His Ni is very, very strong. And I've already said so in my Jaime post but LIE are fairly good at Fe. What Petyr is not good at is realising his real feelings and realising the real feelings of others. He thinks he loves Catylen and that she loves him, which isn't the case. He uses goals like revenge against the Starks and Tullys as an excuse for his utter ambition to control everything around him. The fact that he's a genius at financial matters and that I like him doesn't hurt the typing of LIE-Ni I have for him.
Jon Snow
ESI-Fi, easy. Why? Because he knows nothing and ESI have no Te. I'm just kidding. He has a clear moral compass which he stubbornly abides by. He is good at managing psychological distance, and could navigate his complicated relationships within the Stark household. He was quick to judge his future friends when he first joined the Watch, but he later found his impulsive Gamma SF-like judgement to be wrong, because he was simply criticising their actions and not considering the intent behind them [Gamma SF vs Delta NF]. He may not seem Fi dominant because you might think he was unaware of how helping the wildlings would change his relations with the Night's Watch members, but on the contrary, I think he was aware, he just didn't think this hatred of him would lead to him being stabbed by a child while he was the fucking Lord Commander and then being reincarnated. You can't expect someone, a Ne PoLR nonetheless, to have expected that.
He's not good at Ni or Te, as shown in the Battle of Bastards when he rushed to try and save Rickon, and when that failed, he rode forward stupidly consumed by his emotions.