Quote Originally Posted by woofwoofl View Post
interesting that you should use the term "flow" - I was thinking of a flowchart right now as a good depiction of the style!

Only one path down it can be followed simultaneously, and only one result can happen at a time, though the overall form remains regardless of the path chosen at any given time...
Yeah flowchart is a good way of abstracting algorithms. The only disadvantage I see with this analogy is although technically it's right that only one solution could be produced each time, the solution should still be "probabilistic". This aspect is not usually covered in this way. Hence I spoke about pipelines; the solution with the highest ratio of "truthfulness" would be represented by the pipeline which carries higher flow of fluid (information).

I wonder how much of your idea of HP is specific to that which is found in LIIs (as well as ESIs due to them being Rationals that manage Feeling much like LIIs manage , and maybe SLEs also due to the sounding hues) - the IEEs I know are more verbose about things, but go about things in that "multiple perspectives of the same object" kinda approach, and they might be the best ones to look at to see that style in action (at least for myself)...
Well I first read the description and justifications of each CS made by DarkAngelFireWolf69, and later compared it with LIIs. It's easy associationg this way of thinking with a Ti->Ne ego (at least from my point of view), so in certain way, LIIs would be the "archetype" of HP.

Anyway you're right, each type will implement its particular version of the corresponding cognitive style. IEEs, being extroverted and irrational, should be much more verbal than LIIs, etc, but still with the same way of developing reasonings.

It looks like you have a good grasp on things I also noticed your description of DA was much easier for me to get an understanding of...
Probably each type could explain its cognitive style in a better way .

Also, your displays of would then be due to ILIs having as a Demonstrative function, as well as your extensive time in college - academia strikes me as leaning heavily towards the Alpha quadra, which could lead to your strength and comfort in using
I suppose this should be correct. Id functions are strong by default, and with appropiate training oneself could benefit from their usefulness.