Martin Larsson (Rekkles) LIE, alternatively other Ni type.
hes so sweet i can't stop smiling at his sweetness, and also surprised that he plays such a violent character so well
This is what an SEE looks like; high energy, eats healthy, lots of talking, well put together
Dual type (as per tcaudilllg)
Enneagram 2w1sw(1w9) helps others to live up to their own standards of what a good person is and is very behind the scenes in the process.
Tritype 1-2-6 stacking sp/sx
I'm constantly looking to align the real with the ideal.I've been more oriented toward being overly idealistic by expecting the real to match the ideal. My thinking side is dominent. The result is that sometimes I can be overly impersonal or self-centered in my approach, not being understanding of others in the process and simply thinking "you should do this" or "everyone should follor this rule"..."regardless of how they feel or where they're coming from"which just isn't a good attitude to have. It is a way, though, to give oneself an artificial sense of self-justification. LSE
Best description of functions:
she seems very J, and T, LSE perhaps
Enoch Powell: LIE
Beyonce > SEE-Fi, in conversation with Oprah > EIE-Ni = relations of benefit
Noteworthy points >
- Notice Beyonce's more impassive, walled off, less mobile facial expressions (Fi) and overall demeanor in comparison to Oprah's more mobile, fluent, expressive, open, readily discernible (Fe) affect.
- In her questioning, Oprah tries to project her own Fe [enneagram 2w3] "need to please," "need to be liked," and chameleon like experience (always adapting to others, never being certain of her own identity) onto Beyonce's experience and Bey agrees to some extent but speaks to always having known who she was and never feeling the need to follow anyone or do what anyone else was doing, even as a kid (Fi).
- Beyonce says she's learned to be kind but strong, and that she must be fair to herself. She acknowledges that for the majority of her career, she's only given the public glimpses of who she is through her artistry and music because she believes that possessing a "mystique" is important. She says that there is still much that she doesn't share > Se and Fi af. Juxtaposed to Oprah who is the epitome of the bare all "open book."
- Oprah says that life is about connecting the dots and that there's a thread that runs through everyone's life and the purpose is to tether that thread to the dots (creative Ni); Beyonce says that she's beginning to notice the dots because she finally sees that they are everywhere and interrelated (suggestive Ni).
Last edited by Alonzo; 07-26-2019 at 02:23 PM.
^ I’m not that familiar with Beyoncé, but the woman in that interview is Gamma as hell, and I agree with @Alonzo; SEE-Fi.
She's a bit like an ESI-Se whom I know, but she's crossed over the Extrovert line.
ESI-Fi > ESI > ESI-Se > SEE-Fi > SEE > SEE-Se
Last edited by Adam Strange; 07-26-2019 at 12:40 PM.
Tarja Halonen, ex-president of Finland
ILI - Dominant
Barbara Loden: ESI
Hyori is more of an SEE I think, she has so much fun playing her roles as actress/singer. Also, her voice is off the charts ^_^
i really like esi's
yeah you could've mistyped everyone of course, just like everyone else here. you're theory makes total sense - "you can only figure out your type through IR" - meanwhile you say that everyone is probably mistyped. you're one smart man. a little bit creepy though i have to say, finding random strangers on vk and typing them on here...
Last edited by maniac; 07-28-2019 at 11:19 AM.
> meanwhile you say that everyone is probably mistype
a good chance that some or all of that group of your "ESI" are mistyped. it's significant % as that group should be small, your skills are low and there are bad typing skills in average
the more people you used to analize your IR effects, the lesser contradictions you see in their behavior to the theory - the lesser probability you mistake in what your IR effects are
as you still doubt even in your own type so you can't be sure in your typings skills to make the assertions alike above about ESIs. after you'll positively check your type by IR with people of different types IRL only then you'll have basic skills to gather a group of people of a concrete type to claim about them, especially people which are not IRL near your as this is harder to type such ones
you may need years of positive practice to have a possibility to type people good which are not IRL near you, as you have rather limited and doubtful data about them. you ignore this need because local noobs act the same, alike they may trust own opinions without having any basis to trust to them. the noobs want to talk now, but do not want to study the theme to be ready for that. it's not reasonable approach and on that I've pointed
understand your type, at least. then type actors and make opinions what you feel to actors of concrete types based on your own opinions
@Sol i haven't made the statement about esi's from irl people, i don't really type people irl. I've watched people that are commonly mistyped esi on here.
look - I've seen you made a statement that typings are on average 20 percent correct (or something along those lines) even yours. so how the hell does it make sense? and how the hell is a person going to deice their type based on IR if that statement is true? you make literally no sense. stop thinking you're above everyone else in typing others especially if you're not going to explain why. and yes, one CAN explain intuitive impressions. theres a reason no one likes you here and its not because everyone else is Fe-valuing.
I'm putting your retarded ass on block now. if i know you well enough you will still respond to this post because you literally have nothing better to do with your life than nitpick on the internet