Sociotype: SLI. Te subtype.
MBTI: It varies.
Enneagram: 5w6
Instinct Stacking: Not entirely sure. I relate to both sp/sx and sp/so. Whatever Vladimir Putin is, maybe.
Astrological sign: Sagittarius
Chinese Zodiac: OX
Sociotype: SLI. Te subtype.
MBTI: It varies.
Enneagram: 5w6
Instinct Stacking: Not entirely sure. I relate to both sp/sx and sp/so. Whatever Vladimir Putin is, maybe.
Astrological sign: Sagittarius
Chinese Zodiac: OX
What are your head measurements, DeAnte?
deante what are you still doing here go away you have a life to live a family to feed
dakota is dating some guy so life is shit again
Thank you.
Oh shit, Ashton brought Adolph in Delta Qudra.
Wrong quadra...
the truth is she could never compare to dakota so why bother
because you're creepy and obsessive and you need to stop
we love you
come home
please
“Whether we fall by ambition, blood, or lust, like diamonds we are cut with our own dust.”
Originally Posted by Gilly
Now this is a story all about how, my type got changed, turned upside down. Just wait for a minute and watch chatbox right there, & I'll tell how Gem became the moderator with blue hair.
In typology central friended and praised, on the picture thread was where she spent most her days. Chilling out, selfies, relaxing all cool, And all typing some people and getting them schooled.
When a couple of girls who were up to no good, Started annoying her & her friends in the forumhood, She got in one little flame war & got pissed off & said 'I'm moving in with that exboyfriend in the forum with the socionics toffs.
So Gem pulls up to the forum for a year without being a hater, And yells to typocentral 'Yo creeps! Smell Ya later', Became a mod in her kingdom she was finally there, To sit on her throne as the mod with blue hair.
InvisibruJim
Sociotype: IEE (possibly Fi-subtype)
MBTI: INTP
Enneagram: 5w6
Instinct Stacking: possibly sp/sx/so
Astrological sign: Taurus (Ascendant Scorpio)
Chinese Zodiac: Fire Rabbit
Mayan sign: 7 Akbal ("Reflective Night")
Wisdom: Knowledge condensed in antithetical propositions.
"Life is all about my most recent and pompous interpretation" [Narcisistic Scoundrel (Begining of Humanity - End of Humanity)]
Sociotype:ENFp - IEE (subtipe unknown)
MBTI: XNFP
Enneagram: 6w7
Instinct Stacking: So/Sx
Astrological sign: Libra - Scorpio Cusp
Chinese Zodiac: Fire Tiger
Blood Type: idk LOL
Favorite Ice Cream Flavor: Lemon....mmmm...*lick
<.< I was here before 2013 ^^ better late then never. ?_? also whut iz dis about eating blood? *_* I love black pudding!?
Big5 rxUa|I| 6w7- 4 - 1 So/Sx
= Fear is a cage where you locked yourself up. Courage & faith in yourself is the key to freedom. =
= Shit happens. Realx and make the most of it. You can not control what is outside of yourself. =
Alignment: Neutral Good-ish / Snarky-Needy Bastard
Sociotype: EII-Ne
Enneagram: 9w1
Instinct Stacking: possibly sp/so
-
Dual type (as per tcaudilllg)
Enneagram 5 (wings either 4 or 6)?
I'm constantly looking to align the real with the ideal.I've been more oriented toward being overly idealistic by expecting the real to match the ideal. My thinking side is dominent. The result is that sometimes I can be overly impersonal or self-centered in my approach, not being understanding of others in the process and simply thinking "you should do this" or "everyone should follor this rule"..."regardless of how they feel or where they're coming from"which just isn't a good attitude to have. It is a way, though, to give oneself an artificial sense of self-justification. LSE
Best description of functions:
http://socionicsstudy.blogspot.com/2...functions.html
-
Dual type (as per tcaudilllg)
Enneagram 5 (wings either 4 or 6)?
I'm constantly looking to align the real with the ideal.I've been more oriented toward being overly idealistic by expecting the real to match the ideal. My thinking side is dominent. The result is that sometimes I can be overly impersonal or self-centered in my approach, not being understanding of others in the process and simply thinking "you should do this" or "everyone should follor this rule"..."regardless of how they feel or where they're coming from"which just isn't a good attitude to have. It is a way, though, to give oneself an artificial sense of self-justification. LSE
Best description of functions:
http://socionicsstudy.blogspot.com/2...functions.html
Sociotype: IEE
MBTI: ENFP
Enneagram: ---
Instinct Stacking: ...I'll have to first find out what that is.
Astrological sign: Scorpio
Chinese Zodiac: Pig
Blood Type: yes
Hm. I just read up on instincts and I still have no idea which I am. I'm sure I have some, though.
And it's good to be here again. My password to this forum died along with an old laptop of mine, and I couldn't remember it for the longest time.
Welcome back! Been a while.
Looking for an Archnemesis. Willing applicants contact via PM.
ENFp - Fi 7w6 sp/sx
The Ineffable IEI
The Einstein ENTp
johari nohari
http://www.mypersonality.info/ssmall/
Too right, a really looong while. I missed this place. I'm glad I've got my password again.
Sociotype: IEE-H
Age: 26
Gender: Male
Socionics Type: IEE (ILE is a slight possibility as well)
Enneagram Type: 7w6 9w8 4w3 (or maybe 2w3 or 3w2 rather than 4w3) so/sx
Aliases: kitfool, kayto (keito), tigger, kat, katastic, whatevs
Age: 22
Gender: Female(ish?)
Sign: Cancer (with much leo)
Hobbies and likes: Reading, attempting to write fiction, reading about diseases, anatomy, chemistry, reading about paraphilias, singing, musicals, guitar, flute, clarinet, cooking, eating, drinking, wine pairings, wine tasting, cheese, dark chocolate, personality theory (particularly enneagram), making a mess, World of Warcraft, The Sims 3, Zelda, Pokemon, Smash bros melee, psychology, astrology, beer, dark beer, guinness, arguing. etc.
Why I'm here: I am easily obsessed with things, socionics currently, though I haven't forgotten the enneagram. And you guys are nicer than the other forum people...
Last edited by roastingmallows; 11-05-2014 at 12:46 PM.
Sociotype: EII - Ne
MBTI: xNFP
Enneagram: 4w3 7w6 9w1
Instinct Stacking: sx/so
Big 5: RLUAI
Chaotic Neutral
Astrological sign: Gemini with leo rising and cancer moon
Blood type: AB+
Gender: Female
Last edited by huiheiwufhawriuhg; 11-20-2014 at 09:51 PM.
Socionics Type: IEE
Enneagram Type: 6w7
Aliases: yiffer
Age: 22
Gender: Amorphous blob
Hobbies: Meta
Why I'm here: Mostly to read about + discuss fictional characters, media creators and media quadrant values since I can't do it with anyone else I know
Last edited by yifflord; 10-09-2016 at 09:42 AM.
"A man with a definite belief always appears bizarre, because he does not change with the world; he has climbed into a fixed star, and the earth whizzes below him like a zoetrope."
........ G. ........... K. ............... C ........ H ........ E ...... S ........ T ...... E ........ R ........ T ........ O ........ N ........
"Having a clear faith, based on the creed of the Church, is often labeled today as fundamentalism... Whereas relativism, which is letting oneself be tossed and swept along
by every wind of teaching, looks like the only
attitude acceptable to today's standards." - Pope Benedict the XVI, "The Dictatorship of Relativism"
.
.
.
Socionics: SLI
MBTI: INTJ
Aliases: Mind, Time
Enneagram: 5w6, 9w1, 4w3
Instinct Stacking: sp/xx
DnD: True Neutral
Gender: Male
If you want to go by function labelings than:
MBTI INTJ = NiTe which would be a socionics ILI -INTp
MBTI ISTJ = SiTe which would be socionics SLI-ISTp
But disregarding that, you've still mistaken a lot. Socionics was built altering the function definitions Jung had defined and so inherently work on a different set of understanding of the human psyche. MBTI itself also has various defining models, less structured but roots itself in Jung's definitions. I go with Lenor Thompson's take upon it as I think she conveys the most accuracy in terms of simplifying mental processes of each type in Jung's functions, as well as being correct. Different to Keirsey, who I think has widely misconstrued much in formulating almost stereotypical abstractions of each type.
As you used MBT preferences labeling like INFP, - preferences which are compatible in both variants, - then types are same. And as MBT use on practice mostly preferences you must to use preferences to say MBTs opinion. As MBT uses non-Jung's functional model of introverted types and even wrongly claims it uses Jung's one despite evidence, then we can't use MBT's functional there. But we can to use Jung's/Socionics model and convertion by them will monosemanticly be INFP -> IEI, IEI -> INFP.
Another things about functions. As MBT claims it uses 8 Jung's functions and indeed agrees with essence and base of them - same base with wich Socionics agrees (Socionics claims it expanded descrptions, not contriverts to Jung's one) - hence 8 functions are identical in both variants, while main difference is just where they are described better.
The only significant contradiction between MBT and Socionics is non-Jungian fuctional model for introverted types in MBT, but this conflict misses in types notations by preferences only and as MBT on practice use preferences mostly this minimizes their mislead.
So to write: Socionics: SLI, MBTI: INTJ is completely senseless.
Last edited by Sol; 09-09-2015 at 12:16 PM.
Ah... fluidly altering the labelings of the types. This is a semantic issue. I'm not going to get into this however it's solidified that an INFP in MBTI is wholly considered to be an FiTe user. Not an NiFe user as socionics labels place it.
And also, this convinces me your opinion is a subjective interpretation of both models and it's as if you didn't read my post. Socionics definitions are not an expansion of the functions. They are described more as consequences of the functions, which in turn makes them more liable to an altering philosophy over mental processes of the mind. Furthermore, the change in socionics to MBTI is significant enough in both the philosophy and focus of a certain aspect of personality as well as the definitions for a good enough level of interchangeability of various directions in typological types.
I'm almost certain english is not your first language so I'm also unsure how much you even understand what it is that I've said. SLI-ISTp socionics and INTJ in MBTI are certainly not the same thing, but ILI, or LII in socionics and INTJ in MBTI are also not the same thing too. You've been charmed by interface similarities.
Socionics: EII - Ne subtype
MBTI: INFP
Enneagram: 4w3
instinctual variant: so/sx
Tritype: 4w3 9w1 6w7
Global 5: RLUAI
Oldham's personality style: sensitive, Leisurely, Serious
Aligment: Chaotic Neutral
thanks for this, I have been successfully amused for 5 whole minutes. :3
also I'm not Delta guys but it is possible that I could be an ENFp-Ne.... *shrugs*
Socionics: EII-Ne
MBTI: INFJ
Big5: RLOAI
Enneagram: 4w5 so/sp (461 or 451 tritype) (or maybe 5w4?)
Temeperament: Melancholic-Phlegmatic-Choleric
Oldham: Sensitive - Leisurely - Idiosyncratic
Reiss: Acceptance - Curiosity - Idealism - Tranquility
Archetypes: Advocate - Visionary - Intellectual
Role: Priest/Scholar
Holland Code: SI > AC > ER
Alignment: Neutral Good
Astrology: Pisces-Scorpio-Fire-type
Hogwarts/Ilvermorny: Ravenclaw-Pukwudgie
Gender: Female