Why is it that 'objects in motion' (extraverted, dynamic) are considered rational but 'fields in motion' (introverted, dynamic) are considered irrational (and vice versa for things at rest)? Why is the state of rest or motion reversed between extraversion and introversion in relation to rationality; what does 'motion' represent in this context?
http://www.socionics.us/theory/information.shtml



Reply With Quote
= internal statics of objects
= external statics of objects
= external dynamics of objects
= internal dynamics of objects
= internal dynamics of fields
= external dynamics of fields
= external statics of fields
= internal statics of fields


