Sure, why not?
Sure, why not?
According to Bulkov in the Journal of Psychology, Menology and Personality, (Published in Russian by the Socionics Institute of Kiev) supervision is a dangerous relationship because the partners can transfer their "somatic diseases" to each other.
These are unhealthy obsessions that center on the sublimation of core insecurities about their sexuality which submerge into the subconscious and then reemerge as deviant erotic fixations. He gives no examples. I would guess that this means forms of abusive sexual deviancy could emerge that would not exist with a different type of partner.
He says stay away from it.
Socionics -
the16types.info
It's doomed. Find your dual.
"[Scapegrace,] I don't know how anyone can stand such a sinister and mean individual as you." - Maritsa Darmandzhyan
Brought to you by socionix.com
[] | NP | 3[6w5]8 so/sp | Type thread | My typing of forum members | Johari (Strengths) | Nohari (Weaknesses)
You know what? You're an individual, and that makes people nervous. And it's gonna keep making people nervous for the rest of your life. - Ole Golly from Harriet, the spy.
Our types show very much however, we appreciate each others way we look at the world because it is so opposite and new to each of us. He is definitely the most docile, gentle and soothing person I know. So as far as violence goes, after a year we have NEVER had anything close to physical altercation. A far as insecurities go.... we are 21 and 25, it's time to let insecurities go and we know this.
Supervision relationships aren't terrible, my parents are in a supervision relationship(based on one socionics study, it was one of the top 5 for marriage). Good people will be good people and can have decent if not perfect relationship.
However, it's not ideal, and there will be many communication differences and problems that can occur in life.
This is an unequal relationship where generally the supervisee will need to be accommodating to the supervisor or major conflict will occur.
I have a question are you older or younger than your partner?
Also in socionics world you would be "super-ego" hurt... ^_^ The LII's Base function is which is a area of pain for the IEE. Good luck with your relationship, my parents have been together for 40+ years and although it's not perfect for them, they still find time to be good to each other.
“Whether we fall by ambition, blood, or lust, like diamonds we are cut with our own dust.”
Originally Posted by Gilly
And if God cares so wonderfully for flowers that are here today and gone tomorrow, won't he more surely care for you?- Matthew 6:30
I am younger than my partner (im the IEE) by four years... I'm not sure if this helps or hurts but i'm guessing it helps I look to him as a mentor
LIIs can make good friends and mentors for an IEE. Difficult at times but totally worth it. I know because my dad is one and we get along pretty well.
[] | NP | 3[6w5]8 so/sp | Type thread | My typing of forum members | Johari (Strengths) | Nohari (Weaknesses)
You know what? You're an individual, and that makes people nervous. And it's gonna keep making people nervous for the rest of your life. - Ole Golly from Harriet, the spy.
-
Dual type (as per tcaudilllg)
Enneagram 5 (wings either 4 or 6)?
I'm constantly looking to align the real with the ideal.I've been more oriented toward being overly idealistic by expecting the real to match the ideal. My thinking side is dominent. The result is that sometimes I can be overly impersonal or self-centered in my approach, not being understanding of others in the process and simply thinking "you should do this" or "everyone should follor this rule"..."regardless of how they feel or where they're coming from"which just isn't a good attitude to have. It is a way, though, to give oneself an artificial sense of self-justification. LSE
Best description of functions:
http://socionicsstudy.blogspot.com/2...functions.html
It's fixed, but only out of love for duals.
:]
And if God cares so wonderfully for flowers that are here today and gone tomorrow, won't he more surely care for you?- Matthew 6:30
“Whether we fall by ambition, blood, or lust, like diamonds we are cut with our own dust.”
Originally Posted by Gilly
We're still together - been awhile since I've been on here! I'm back and we're doing great
IEE LII supervision is not bad given the right subtypes it can be actually quite positive. Plus Gulenko talks about conflict even not being conflict given compatible subtypes and also duality is not good in every circumstance since some subtypes are worse than conflict/just as bad.
Supervision is horrible when perception doesn't match, so IEE ESI, is not great compared to IEE LII yet even with that some subtypes are more compatible.