I don't why I didn't think of this before because it's actually pretty simple. Consider the following
Ethics (moral, amoral, immoral)
Strong Fi-valued -> decides with moral consideration
Strong Fe-nonvalued -> acts with some passionate/persona consideration
Weak Fi-valued -> wants to decide with moral consideration
Weak Fe-nonvalued -> wants to act with no passionate/persona consideration
Strong Fi-nonvalued -> decides with amoral consideration
Strong Fe-valued -> acts with passionate/persona consideration
Weak Fi-nonvalued -> wants to decide with no moral consideration (immoral)
Weak Fe-valued -> wants to act with passionate/persona consideration
It would be interesting to apply ethical philosophies to each. But I don't know that much about philosophy. So does anyone that knows a lot about the different studied philosophies of the world want to assign some categories based on the above?
The only ones that stand out for me would be
Strong Fi-nonvalued -> decides with amoral consideration
as probably a moral nihilist.
Strong Fi-valued -> decides with moral consideration
as probably some form of idealist.


Reply With Quote
can investigate just about everything else under the sun..except moral considerations. While
is limited to morality and dumbfounded with all else.



, the recognition of emotional states.
has nothing to do with "logic" per se.
or
may go about it in a different manner, but I don't see how it's an avoidable subject for either one (I would say that a Se type's inclination to theorize would usually be more emergent and directly situational). Outside some people being constantly distracted with their own narcissism and juvenile interests (which can happen), they're going to be moral in some way. It's a shared interest across all of the types.
ethical theory.
interprets the long term cause-effect relationship of explicit spatial behavior - cautious
