I don't why I didn't think of this before because it's actually pretty simple. Consider the following
Ethics (moral, amoral, immoral)
Strong Fi-valued -> decides with moral consideration
Strong Fe-nonvalued -> acts with some passionate/persona consideration
Weak Fi-valued -> wants to decide with moral consideration
Weak Fe-nonvalued -> wants to act with no passionate/persona consideration
Strong Fi-nonvalued -> decides with amoral consideration
Strong Fe-valued -> acts with passionate/persona consideration
Weak Fi-nonvalued -> wants to decide with no moral consideration (immoral)
Weak Fe-valued -> wants to act with passionate/persona consideration
It would be interesting to apply ethical philosophies to each. But I don't know that much about philosophy. So does anyone that knows a lot about the different studied philosophies of the world want to assign some categories based on the above?
The only ones that stand out for me would be
Strong Fi-nonvalued -> decides with amoral consideration
as probably a moral nihilist.
Strong Fi-valued -> decides with moral consideration
as probably some form of idealist.


Reply With Quote
can investigate just about everything else under the sun..except moral considerations. While
is limited to morality and dumbfounded with all else.



than anything else.
ethical theory.
ethics, particularly LSE.
I had not noticed.
, the recognition of emotional states.
