View Poll Results: How sure are you of your self-typing?

Voters
69. You may not vote on this poll
  • 90-99%

    40 57.97%
  • 80-89%

    14 20.29%
  • 70-79%

    6 8.70%
  • 60-69%

    4 5.80%
  • 50-59%

    2 2.90%
  • 40-49%

    0 0%
  • 30-39%

    1 1.45%
  • 20-29%

    0 0%
  • 10-19%

    1 1.45%
  • less than 9%

    1 1.45%
Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 40 of 60

Thread: How positive are you of your self-typing?

Hybrid View

  1. #1
    not gonna be around as much anymore
    Join Date
    Oct 2010
    TIM
    C-IEE
    Posts
    1,255
    Mentioned
    3 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default How positive are you of your self-typing?

    A lot of people have questioned, or been questioned about-- their types lately. So, how sure are you of your own self-typing?

    Post below, or simply answer the poll above. I did not include a 100% option, because that is, IMO, impossible.



    NOTE: votes are public.
    My life's work (haha):
    http://www.the16types.info/vbulletin/blog.php?b=709
    Input, PLEASEAnd thank you

  2. #2
    Hello...? somavision's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Location
    London
    Posts
    1,466
    Mentioned
    8 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    poll please.
    IEE-Ne

  3. #3
    aka Slacker Slacker's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Location
    North Korea
    TIM
    IEE
    Posts
    8,814
    Mentioned
    24 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    I agree that I dont' believe in 100%s as far as this goes. I've seen too many people who change their type after being super super sure for ages.

    I am reasonably sure though.
    It ain't what you don't know that gets you into trouble. It's what you know for sure that just ain't so.
    -Mark Twain


    You can't wake a person who is pretending to be asleep.

  4. #4
    <something> Wynch's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Location
    On a Hill
    TIM
    ILE
    Posts
    3,900
    Mentioned
    6 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    I feel like the number is a little arbitrary, but I gave myself an A, lol.
    ILE
    7w8 so/sp

    Very busy with work. Only kind of around.

  5. #5
    Trevor's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Posts
    2,840
    Mentioned
    10 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Is it possible to be 100% sure of something while actually being wrong?

  6. #6
    not gonna be around as much anymore
    Join Date
    Oct 2010
    TIM
    C-IEE
    Posts
    1,255
    Mentioned
    3 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Director Trevor View Post
    Is it possible to be 100% sure of something while actually being wrong?
    No. To be 100% sure would require absolute, empirical evidence.

    Unless you're psychotic, then the rules no longer apply.
    My life's work (haha):
    http://www.the16types.info/vbulletin/blog.php?b=709
    Input, PLEASEAnd thank you

  7. #7
    Trevor's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Posts
    2,840
    Mentioned
    10 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by pianosinger View Post
    No. To be 100% sure would require absolute, empirical evidence.

    Unless you're psychotic, then the rules no longer apply.
    So, this is how you think. It's good to know .

  8. #8
    High Priestess glam's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Posts
    2,371
    Mentioned
    68 Post(s)
    Tagged
    1 Thread(s)

    Default

    i find it hard to put a percentage on this kind of thing. when it comes to your self-typing, you are either wrong or you're right about it... in my case, i think my self-typing is right of course

  9. #9
    Hot Message FDG's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2005
    Location
    North Italy
    TIM
    ENTj
    Posts
    16,615
    Mentioned
    235 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by pianosinger View Post
    No. To be 100% sure would require absolute, empirical evidence.

    Unless you're psychotic, then the rules no longer apply.
    Meh, this is wrong on so many levels. I am 100% sure of plenty of stuff, yet I ain't psychotic. Anyway, I vote 100%, even if it's not allowed by the poll.
    Obsequium amicos, veritas odium parit

  10. #10
    "Information without energy is useless" Nowisthetime's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2010
    Location
    near Russia
    TIM
    SEI
    Posts
    1,022
    Mentioned
    6 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Director Trevor View Post
    Is it possible to be 100% sure of something while actually being wrong?
    Of course it is. Certainty is subjective, even when it's 100 %, it's not the same as truth.

    What matters is how you reach certainty. Do you read horoscopes or do you have a better method.
    Last edited by Nowisthetime; 03-11-2011 at 11:42 AM.

  11. #11

    Join Date
    Sep 2010
    Location
    US
    TIM
    IEI-Ni 4w5 sx/so
    Posts
    731
    Mentioned
    7 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    I went with 80-89%, it would actually be somewhere in the high 80s low 90s. I can never be certain of anything and its impossible for me to not acknowledge the possibility that my self typing may be wrong.. But I have considered basically everything and IEI fits. There's nothing to go against it, like with all other types I have thought about.

  12. #12
    not gonna be around as much anymore
    Join Date
    Oct 2010
    TIM
    C-IEE
    Posts
    1,255
    Mentioned
    3 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by somavision View Post
    poll please.
    yeah, you posted while I was still creating the poll
    My life's work (haha):
    http://www.the16types.info/vbulletin/blog.php?b=709
    Input, PLEASEAnd thank you

  13. #13
    Hello...? somavision's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Location
    London
    Posts
    1,466
    Mentioned
    8 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by pianosinger View Post
    yeah, you posted while I was still creating the poll
    ok cheers. Certain enough to only question during times of boredom or random self doubt.... overall, as certain as I can be without being 100% certain.
    IEE-Ne

  14. #14
    Robot Assassin Pa3s's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2010
    Location
    Germany
    TIM
    Ne-LII, 5w6
    Posts
    3,629
    Mentioned
    46 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Cartman
    I'm not just sure, i'm HIV positive
    lol j/k. I'm not. (I chose 30-39%, but it's very variable to the point of 'Socionics doesn't work')
    Last edited by Pa3s; 03-11-2011 at 09:08 AM.
    „Man can do what he wants but he cannot want what he wants.“
    – Arthur Schopenhauer

  15. #15
    Imagine Timeless's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Location
    San Francisco, CA.
    TIM
    ILE/ENTp
    Posts
    817
    Mentioned
    3 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by HaveLucidDreamz View Post
    But I listen to this when I'm looking for more toilet paper.

    It turns into a quest.


  16. #16
    Creepy-male

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Timeless View Post
    But I listen to this when I'm looking for more toilet paper.

    It turns into a quest.

    Here is a victory anthem when you reprocure your toilet paper


  17. #17
    Imagine Timeless's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Location
    San Francisco, CA.
    TIM
    ILE/ENTp
    Posts
    817
    Mentioned
    3 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by HaveLucidDreamz View Post
    Here is a victory anthem when you reprocure your toilet paper

    YouTube - Electric Romeo (Choir) - Immediate Music


    Quote Originally Posted by FDG View Post
    Meh, this is wrong on so many levels. I am 100% sure of plenty of stuff, yet I ain't psychotic. Anyway, I vote 100%, even if it's not allowed by the poll.
    That's what all psychotics say.

  18. #18
    Marie84's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2009
    Location
    Toronto, Canada
    TIM
    EII
    Posts
    2,347
    Mentioned
    4 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    idk, maybe 90%...? I'm open to the possibility that I could be wrong or that Socionics in general might be coincidental>factually universal, the rest of the doubt comes from questioning stereotypes and how that may affect my type. But overall, what I think I'm strong and weak in, seek IE wise and other intertype relational reasons fits with my self-typing, so I'd say overall I feel fairly confident about it
    EII INFj
    Forum status: retired

  19. #19
    Feeling fucking fantastic golden's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2010
    Location
    Second story
    TIM
    EIE
    Posts
    3,724
    Mentioned
    250 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Went with 60 percent.
    LSI: “I still can’t figure out Pinterest.”

    Me: “It’s just, like, idea boards.”

    LSI: “I don’t have ideas.”

  20. #20
    Jarno's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    Netherlands
    TIM
    ILI-Te
    Posts
    5,418
    Mentioned
    34 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by pianosinger View Post
    I did not include a 100% option, because that is, IMO, impossible.
    are you only 99% sure you are a woman?

  21. #21

    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    TIM
    ILE
    Posts
    100
    Mentioned
    1 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Why even use percentage if you can't achieve 100 % certainty? And as long as you are more certain on X than on Y or Z, the numbers would be arbitrary. 1 % certainty might be pretty certain if there's no alternative that's more plausible.

  22. #22
    Jarno's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    Netherlands
    TIM
    ILI-Te
    Posts
    5,418
    Mentioned
    34 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    So far 2/3 are certain about their selftyping. Interesting poll.

  23. #23
    not gonna be around as much anymore
    Join Date
    Oct 2010
    TIM
    C-IEE
    Posts
    1,255
    Mentioned
    3 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Jarno View Post
    are you only 99% sure you are a woman?
    No. But my gender can be empirically proven (you, however, will just have to take my work for it).
    My life's work (haha):
    http://www.the16types.info/vbulletin/blog.php?b=709
    Input, PLEASEAnd thank you

  24. #24
    Jarno's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    Netherlands
    TIM
    ILI-Te
    Posts
    5,418
    Mentioned
    34 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by pianosinger View Post
    No. But my gender can be empirically proven (you, however, will just have to take my work for it).
    what do you mean by empirically proven. you look like a woman? oke I look like an ILI-Te.

    there we are, empirically proven.

  25. #25
    not gonna be around as much anymore
    Join Date
    Oct 2010
    TIM
    C-IEE
    Posts
    1,255
    Mentioned
    3 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Jarno View Post
    what do you mean by empirically proven. you look like a woman? oke I look like an ILI-Te.

    there we are, empirically proven.
    Gender is something that has been accepted and proven scientifically; all nations, races, and cultures agree on the definitions of "man" and "woman." Gender is very specific. Sure, there are rare cases where gender is more vague, such as in the case of someone born with both sets of genitalia.

    I am a woman, because I look and sound like a woman, sure; but I also possess the genetic double-X chromosome that defines me as a "woman," I have given birth, twice.

    No human being on this earth could refute the fact that I am a woman and be taken at all seriously. However, if someone were to question my socionics type, they could be much more successful.
    My life's work (haha):
    http://www.the16types.info/vbulletin/blog.php?b=709
    Input, PLEASEAnd thank you

  26. #26
    The Looks stanprollyright's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Location
    In your pants
    TIM
    IEE-Ne cp 6w7 sx/so
    Posts
    555
    Mentioned
    2 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by pianosinger View Post
    Gender is something that has been accepted and proven scientifically; all nations, races, and cultures agree on the definitions of "man" and "woman." Gender is very specific. Sure, there are rare cases where gender is more vague, such as in the case of someone born with both sets of genitalia.

    I am a woman, because I look and sound like a woman, sure; but I also possess the genetic double-X chromosome that defines me as a "woman," I have given birth, twice.

    No human being on this earth could refute the fact that I am a woman and be taken at all seriously. However, if someone were to question my socionics type, they could be much more successful.
    What you are describing is called sex. You can empirically prove yourself as the female sex because you poses female reproductive organs. "Gender", "man", and "woman", are all social constructs/psychological attitudes that cannot be empirically proven. Hence transgender people: people who belong to the male sex but are women by gender, or belong to the female sex but are men by gender.
    Stan is not my real name.

  27. #27
    Quaris's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2010
    Location
    Finland
    Posts
    235
    Mentioned
    1 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    After 2 years of socionics interest I still have no idea.

  28. #28
    WE'RE ALL GOING HOME HERO's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2010
    Posts
    1,143
    Mentioned
    53 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    I hate myself and want to die so I must be IEI.

  29. #29
    Airman's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2009
    Posts
    1,541
    Mentioned
    21 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by lazybones View Post
    I hate myself and want to die so I must be IEI.
    perfect reasoning. sometimes I question myself if I am your dual.

  30. #30
    an object in motion woofwoofl's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2011
    Location
    Southern Arizona
    TIM
    x s x p s p s x
    Posts
    2,112
    Mentioned
    326 Post(s)
    Tagged
    2 Thread(s)

    Default

    I put myself in the 90%-99% range of certainty for SEE

    I tried considering IEE, that didn't work

    I tried considering ILI and LIE - they make sense to me, until I encounter an ILI or an LIE

    I tried considering ESI, LSE, and SLI - none of those added up in the end either, nor does EII...

    That said, I can come off a bit IEE, ILI, or even LSE or SLI at specific times, and there's a chance that no one person will ever experience all of those from me - regardless, though, I'm almost certain of me being SEE

    As far as subtypes go, though, I'm a bit less certain... about 65% or so at the moment...
    p . . . a . . . n . . . d . . . o . . . r . . . a
    trad metalz | (more coming)

  31. #31
    Jarno's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    Netherlands
    TIM
    ILI-Te
    Posts
    5,418
    Mentioned
    34 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by woofwoofl View Post
    As far as subtypes go, though, I'm a bit less certain... about 65% or so at the moment...
    You VI as the SEE-Fi subtype.

    Also you seem to care a lot about others instead of making jokes to make yourself laugh, like some Se subtypes do.

    Just my opinion.

  32. #32
    EffyCold The Ineffable's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2010
    Location
    Wallachia
    TIM
    ILE
    Posts
    2,191
    Mentioned
    14 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by woofwoofl View Post
    I put myself in the 90%-99% range of certainty for SEE
    Wow, you're a Socionics expert, woofwoofl! You always type correctly and your explanations are always valid. I want to learn Socionics from you, PLEASE! You're so confident and it feels so good to know that you are always around to guide us when we're falling into error. Please never go away...
    Shock intuition, diamond logic.
     

    The16types.info Scientific Model

  33. #33
    Creepy-Snaps

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by The Ineffable View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by woofwoofl View Post
    I put myself in the 90%-99% range of certainty for SEE
    Wow, you're a Socionics expert, woofwoofl! You always type correctly and your explanations are always valid. I want to learn Socionics from you, PLEASE! You're so confident and it feels so good to know that you are always around to guide us when we're falling into error. Please never go away...
    What's your problem? You were mean and sarcastic to me on the other thread, too.

    Quote Originally Posted by woofwoofl View Post
    I put myself in the 90%-99% range of certainty for SEE

    I tried considering IEE, that didn't work

    I tried considering ILI and LIE - they make sense to me, until I encounter an ILI or an LIE

    I tried considering ESI, LSE, and SLI - none of those added up in the end either, nor does EII...

    That said, I can come off a bit IEE, ILI, or even LSE or SLI at specific times, and there's a chance that no one person will ever experience all of those from me - regardless, though, I'm almost certain of me being SEE

    As far as subtypes go, though, I'm a bit less certain... about 65% or so at the moment...
    You're an awesome SEE at that!

  34. #34
    an object in motion woofwoofl's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2011
    Location
    Southern Arizona
    TIM
    x s x p s p s x
    Posts
    2,112
    Mentioned
    326 Post(s)
    Tagged
    2 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Jarno View Post
    You VI as the SEE-Fi subtype.

    Also you seem to care a lot about others instead of making jokes to make yourself laugh, like some Se subtypes do.

    Just my opinion.
    Thanks! I'll definitely keep that in mind...

    Subtypes come easy to me in obvious examples outside of myself, but other than that, yowww... it's not like when I'm weighing against , or against , where both can't exist simultaneously (by the way, the parts I'm more certain of, I bolded in my sig - that's why "SEE" is bolded, while none of the subtypes are, with "SEE-SLI" being the faintest of them all)...

    In any event, I should be around much more people much more often if I can grow my mental pool of SEEs that I know, to a point where I can get a mental average of them, and from there, try to figure out how far, and in what manner, I deviate from that average, I can make some more progress - the problem still exists that I'm more acquainted with my surroundings then whatever in the world it is that I am...

    Quote Originally Posted by The Ineffable View Post
    Wow, you're a Socionics expert, woofwoofl! You always type correctly and your explanations are always valid. I want to learn Socionics from you, PLEASE! You're so confident and it feels so good to know that you are always around to guide us when we're falling into error. Please never go away...
    As usual, and

    Quote Originally Posted by Mountain Dew View Post
    You're an awesome SEE at that!
    Thanks! you're a pretty awesome ESE - when I was picking out shirts the other day, I found some long sleeve comfy knit kinda ones and thought "this would work on Mountain Dew", then I tried them on, and they were great on me by the way, $80 of shirts for only $13 - hell yeah for clearances and coupons!
    p . . . a . . . n . . . d . . . o . . . r . . . a
    trad metalz | (more coming)

  35. #35
    07490's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    Location
    there
    Posts
    3,032
    Mentioned
    5 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Jarno View Post
    are you only 99% sure you are a woman?
    LOL, You are one funny ILI.
    (D)IEE~FI-(C)SLE~Ni E-5w4(Sp/Sx)/7w8(So/Sp)/9w1(sp/sx)

    Quote Originally Posted by Jarno View Post
    1)
    A girl who I want to date, asks me: well first tell me how tall you are?
    My reply: well I will answer that, if you first tell me how much you weigh!

    2)
    A girl I was dating said she was oh so great at sex etc, but she didn't do blowjobs.
    My reply: Oh I'm really romantic etc, I just will never take you out to dinner.

  36. #36
    ILE - ENTp 1981slater's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Location
    Spain
    TIM
    ILE (ENTp)
    Posts
    4,871
    Mentioned
    16 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Maritsa33
    1981slater ILE
    Quote Originally Posted by thehotelambush
    1981slater ILE/SLE
    Quote Originally Posted by Ashton
    1981slater ILE
    Quote Originally Posted by 1981slater
    1981slater ILE
    Quote Originally Posted by Bolt
    1981slater LIE
    Quote Originally Posted by squark
    1981slater ILE
    Quote Originally Posted by laghlagh
    1981slater ILE
    Quote Originally Posted by somavision
    1981slater ILE
    Quote Originally Posted by Megadoomer
    1981slater ILE
    Quote Originally Posted by Marie84
    1981slater ILE
    Quote Originally Posted by Munenori2
    1981slater ILE
    Quote Originally Posted by Cili
    1981slater ILE
    Quote Originally Posted by eunice
    1981slater ILE
    Quote Originally Posted by voiliov
    1981slater ILE
    Quote Originally Posted by archonalarion
    1981slater ILE
    Quote Originally Posted by cheesy
    1981slater ILE
    Quote Originally Posted by gilly
    1981slater ILE
    Quote Originally Posted by jimbean
    1981slater ILE
    Quote Originally Posted by joy
    1981slater ILE
    Quote Originally Posted by looktothesky
    1981slater ILE
    Quote Originally Posted by strrrng
    1981slater ILE
    Quote Originally Posted by steve
    1981slater ILE
    Quote Originally Posted by tom
    1981slater ILE
    Quote Originally Posted by Warrior Librarian
    1981slater ILE
    Quote Originally Posted by Trevor
    1981slater Ne-Ep
    Quote Originally Posted by EyeSeeCold
    1981slater ILE
    Quote Originally Posted by Timeless
    1981slater ILE
    Quote Originally Posted by Korpsey
    1981slater IEI


    In the 90-99% band
    Last edited by 1981slater; 06-11-2011 at 04:24 PM.
    ILE "Searcher"
    Socionics: ENTp
    DCNH: Dominant --> perhaps Normalizing
    Enneagram: 7w6 "Enthusiast"
    MBTI: ENTJ "Field Marshall" or ENTP "Inventor"
    Astrological sign: Aquarius

    To learn, read. To know, write. To master, teach.

  37. #37
    ILE - ENTp 1981slater's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Location
    Spain
    TIM
    ILE (ENTp)
    Posts
    4,871
    Mentioned
    16 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    So guys I infer from your opinions that I come across as ILE
    ILE "Searcher"
    Socionics: ENTp
    DCNH: Dominant --> perhaps Normalizing
    Enneagram: 7w6 "Enthusiast"
    MBTI: ENTJ "Field Marshall" or ENTP "Inventor"
    Astrological sign: Aquarius

    To learn, read. To know, write. To master, teach.

  38. #38
    Creepy-Snaps

    Default

    I think you need more opinions.

  39. #39
    EffyCold The Ineffable's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2010
    Location
    Wallachia
    TIM
    ILE
    Posts
    2,191
    Mentioned
    14 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    He just needs reassurance, since he's hounted by the fact he's LIE just can't get used to the idea of changing. Come one Slater, I know you can, just one more little effort and you'll feel relieved forever. Don't worry about them, they'll get used to LIE, in two years or so they'll vote with it, I assure you.
    Shock intuition, diamond logic.
     

    The16types.info Scientific Model

  40. #40
    Korpsy Knievel's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2011
    Posts
    4,231
    Mentioned
    33 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by The Ineffable View Post
    He just needs reassurance, since he's hounted by the fact he's LIE just can't get used to the idea of changing. Come one Slater, I know you can, just one more little effort and you'll feel relieved forever. Don't worry about them, they'll get used to LIE, in two years or so they'll vote with it, I assure you.
    Quote Originally Posted by Director Trevor View Post
    Is it possible to be 100% sure of something while actually being wrong?
    Mark your calendars.

Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •