Enjoy,
I will go charting laters.
http://www.fileupyours.com/view/3334...omparison.xlsx
There is no significant data set available, all of these are about 200 people in size. A lot of ricks logic for favouring an 'even' distribution of types is based on some very fuzzy ideas, but fundamentally his analysis of the 'revealed' statistics is acceptable.
Comments on data sets from Rick at socionics.us:
Aushra Augusta was a random sample of 100 lithuanian men and women.
Of these fairly evenly distributed numbers what stands out is the high percentage (60%) of irrational types. Also, the difference between the Alpha (30.5%) and Gamma (18%) quadras is quite large.
In addition, Augusta adds that "among 50 randomly selected married couples 17 (34%) turned out to be optimal" (i.e. dual)
Bukalov and Karpenko was a random sample of 119 married couples from Russia and the Ukraine where the fact they were married was not revealed until after typing took place.
Very even distribution of socionic traits with the exception of logic (71.4% of men) and ethics (68.1% of women).
In addition, this survey furnished the following intertype relations statistics:
within the same quadra - 64%
duality - 45%
activation - 8%
identity - 6%
mirror - 5%
request - 10%
supervision - 5%
others - 13%
with the opposing quadra - 8%
Celebrity benchmark list: Typings of famous people (mostly from the former Soviet Union) with a high level of convergence among different socionists. Not to be considered a random sample in any sense!
Rick's student: All students from corporate English classes in Kiev, Ukraine hence the propensity of Gammas.








- 
(as per tcaudilllg)

