her opinions don't upset me at all...it's the way she actively pursues everyone presumably as some attempt of getting communal- and self-recognition that she is uniquely EII. It is very pushy and intellectually dishonest and not what you would expect from someone who would like you to believe that they are not only the great understander of Mankind in all its flavours but that she is well-versed in the more formal aspects of the field of Psychology. Her many previous comments however has shown her to be a frequent misunderstander and an apparently unintentional aggravator (I think it would be too generous to say that she is a knowing expert in how to disturb the peace of a wide selection of individuals), and an individual who seems oblivious to the impartiality and importance of the scientific method in general, nevermind being ignorant of the practices commonly used in Psychology.
She recently referred to EIIs as having a "tendency to make broad sweeping moral sentimants towards humanity in their society"...she herself has the habit of making broad sweeping sentiments about an individual based on piecemeal "information" (if something piecemeal can be considered information), and then having a hard-line imposition of the entirety of a person's character and actively pushing this straitjacket onto the person, often in an adversarial way and sometimes in an apparent attempt to provoke, even on people who have been otherwise agreeable...indeed, on occasion, she has managed to do this on Forum Ents who have had a long history of keeping out of all forum conflict and who have clearly been very adverse and badly affected by such conflict. She has sought out such people and attempted to burn them down!
In reference to her quote, I would suggest that her behaviour is the exact opposite, with the only similarity being the emphasis on other individuals.



