Quote Originally Posted by Subteigh View Post
You really should focus on a person's use of information elements as well as the motivation behind a person's actions over something as wide as the temperaments, even if they they can be shown to be relevant to Socionics. You certainly shouldn't cherry-pick things as you have done, or pursue others as though they are constantly at the gates. Nevermind bringing up the unreliable subject of VI!

I don't see how me reluctantly wearing something once that I slightly dislike to appease someone goes against my self-typing, even if this was a common behaviour...which it isn't. It is rare that such events happen and you are completely blowing my well-worded relation of events out of proportion. I don't like to be confronted about why I have chosen not to wear something or worry about such matters as getting a refund or hurting the feelings of those who would be deeply wounded and liable to feel very down about the perceive strength of a very strong relationship. I don't see why you have to push me on the subject with such little thought and utter lack of an ability to comprehend the possibility that people have a multitude of reasons for doing something that are not always readily understand or at all logical.
The archetype of an EII is"humanist" because people of this sociotype have a tendency to make broad sweeping moral sentimants towards humanity in their society and through evolution ioof man rather than individuala although they do notice and examine mpral qualities of individuals this does npt dictate to pleasing a peraon qho you want to be or show appreciation for their politeneas though it is a very nice and notable jesture. The point here is emphasis. Yours tends to be more about not moral evaluation but eather on individual and not moral but action.