I could be wrong but I'm thinking they're both SEI. Dude Si-SEI and chick Fe-SEI. Cashier seems LSE. The whole construction feels more delta tinged to me.
-- ILE, the Parade Rainer!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! <-- Rain
Parade <-- Parade
Arctures: delta just produces boring people
Arctures: but that's how we like it
vero: who needs a real person
vero: That's why I date an SLI
dolphin: someone tell gulanzon adjusting shower water to the right temperature is not si
Kraezz: you just have to do the ****** thing sometimes
It's clearly intended to be an ILE guy and an SEI girl in my opinion. Notice how he is the one who initiates contact (extraversion), but he's not very good at it (weak ethics). The comic books represent their shared valued Ne, which they both feel the need to hide in America's image-conscious Se-valuing culture.
Quaero Veritas.
if they are supposedly Fe-valuers, why would their emotions have to be explained in the thought bubbles, instead of just letting clearly expressed emotions speak for themselves?
this video focuses more on Fi than Fe, it's about subdued feelings of resonance, attraction and shared feelings.
The thought bubbles use emoticons, which by their nature express different kinds of emotional states. Fe is the element which deals with our changing states of emotion (internal dynamics of objects). Fi deals with sentiments and personal opinions, which cannot be expressed in emoticon form (certainly not the emoticons used in this film). This is because Fi deals with the relationships between people (internal statics of fields), not people's fluctuating emotional states.
In other words, just because it's not expressed externally, doesn't mean it's not Fe.
Obviously, elements of both kinds of Ethics are present in the video -- it depicts the forming of a new relationship, after all, and how the girl's Fi sentiments toward the guy change from "I don't care for you" to "I like you". But in my opinion the thought bubbles clearly depict the Fe emotional states of an ILE and an SEI.
Quaero Veritas.
I don't see what's all that different about recognizing "competence and other qualities" from sentiment. Are people with sentiment more simple or mysterious in their choice making?
Personally, I could throwand
out the window and say it's
that would provoke me to express "sentiment" about comic books. It's like a fun sandbox for the "big picture". And being
valuing, I "like" the big picture. I don't choose to like it. I just do.
And by big picture, I mean it's a huge medium that presents a lot of speculative or timeless ideas in a fun way. Lets use the X-Men, for example. I don't know if Stan Lee meant it, but it seems to be loosely based on civil rights issues (where Professor X is a kind of MLK Jr., character in his promotion of mutant/human cooperation. And Magneto more along the lines of Malcolm X, who thought it better to extinguish humans and only desired that the "superior" mutants become the future face of evolution).
I "like" the subject of civil rights and race integration not necessarily because of mere sentiment, but because I'm not a smallminded fool. I think that we are essentially an explorer race. But we aren't going to reach the true potential of that if we fight about ethnicity or culture or something along those lines. We'll never collectively evolve that way. It might even be possible that a species like ours is very rare. Taking that into account, it could be one of the most ultimate moral imperatives to evolve and cooperate. There's a huge universe out there. Who else is going to explore it? We don't know, but it should be on our minds more to ultimately work towards that ourselves.
A comic book like the X-men is just a small speck of thought in our day and age, that's pointing to these bigger ideals, explicitly stated or not. Professor X is the shit. I "like" him. It's not just mere sentiment. I'm not just fond of his baldness and wheelchair.
I don't really think evaluating qualities about someone or properties of someone means I like them. I think Paul McCartney is a talented and great musician, but I don't particularly like him and from his bandmate George's appraisal of Paul, it seems he was kinda of a asshole.
As far as having personal sentiment of any sort, this is the domain of. You may like some information because it's
valuing but it doesn't mean the information you're conveying when you say "I like something" is
.
Saying "I like" isn't a
statement.