Quote Originally Posted by RaptorWizard View Post
Carl Jung was using a lot of Ni, and it seemed really rattling and powerful, but I just don't see him as a judging type. He was too blending in or chameleon like, too shrouded or puffed up, like his practical planning side was completely absent.

Types I'm open to for Jung include ISTP, ISFP, and INTJ.

Why do so many people think he was an INFJ? He's too cold, mechanical, pressured, not really people oriented or bolted into the society weave. He's not INFJ.

Well, come to think of it, Jung is kind of like Plato, making roles, images, dreams, realities, layers, rainbows, cornucopias, so all in all, Plato as an INFP may be similar to Jung. Jung could be INTJ.

plato was imo an IEI, too. sigmund freud was an ILI. sensing types do not perceive these abstract patterns that jung and freud noticed. Ni is the ability to look into the internal soul of someone. Ni-doms are great psychologists. they usually help sensing types with mental problems that they aren't even aware of.