
Originally Posted by
RaptorWizard
Carl Jung was an ISTP. He did a lot of tests, experiments. INTPs and INFPs and all of them are thoughtful, not results oriented. He also, despite being esoteric, focus on reality, on the supernatural, on the mystical, but he's really not that playful or romantic like INxP. He does things in an orderly, predictive way. I find other ISTPs such as Bruce Lee to be very enigmatic and revolutionary in a grandiose, all world embarking magic, so even though I think that Carl Jung was the same type as Bruce Lee, Jung would ne nowhere near Lee's level. Jung is also not very random or rational, so he can't be an INTP, where there's boxes and facts on everything. He's also not INFP, because he doesn't flow well. But what about all the people saying he's INFJ? That's also not true, because Jung is not that imperious, domineering, or controlling. J is completely absent in his personality.
Personally, I find ISTP and INxP more interesting than INFJ usually, because P is universal, expansive, redefining, unleashed. INFJ is just generally new age traps and illusion. So I'm kind of taking Carl Jung as someone similar to Me as an INTP, but 1 letter different, ISTP. Some traits in common yes, but no Bruce Lee level ISTP.