You know what's dumb? Socionics is the study of intertype relationships. What about Identical relationships? That's not intertype, that's inter-people. That's intratype. Not an intertype relationship. 'The study of intertype relationships' is not all-encompassing for what socionics actually is! We need a change.
And considering how important function analysis is between two different types, why not 'the study of function interaction' or 'the study of interpersonal relationships' or 'the study of psychological interpersonal interaction' or 'the study of psychological relationships'.
I dunno.I'm just being picky cause of pianosinger's thread to rename "conflictors".
![]()
![]()


I'm just being picky cause of pianosinger's thread to rename "conflictors".
Reply With Quote

And thank you
Likewise. And I do.

- 
(as per tcaudilllg)
for sure, but the natural language convention here is dumb compared to the math convention, which is that things are not assumed to be distinct unless specified. Are you seriously going to say that we need a separate category for Identical relationships? It just doesn't make sense.
