without hair!
![]()
without hair!
![]()
Sexy, almost evilOriginally Posted by Joy
![]()
Who is that?
Well I am back. How's everyone? Don't have as much time now, but glad to see some of the old gang are still here.
Not sexy and only ALMOST evil. Not very good-looking. Old.Originally Posted by Dioklecian
I don't see Gilligan in that. But this guy has quite many INTp facial traits. The eyes are not that N, but look at the tiny upper lip, and the almost evil look. There is something very INTp about him, but I can't really explain it.
EIE, ENFj, intuitive subtype.
E3 (probably 3w4)
Cool ILI hubbys are better than LSIs any time!
Old blog: http://firsttimeinusa.blogspot.com/
New blog: http://having-a-kid.blogspot.com/
My upper lip is atypical of INTps! Tiny upper lip, ha! Perhaps that is where the saying 'stiff upper lip' came from.
But that guy isn't INTp, he is ENFj.
I think that the "stipp upper lip" has to do with the sexual iceciness of Victorian ladies.Originally Posted by Sycophant
Well I am back. How's everyone? Don't have as much time now, but glad to see some of the old gang are still here.
Gilligan looks like one of my brothers.
But I can't see that guy in Gilligan.Only the proportions of the face are very similar, but the look, the facial expression...
And I still think INTps have a tendency to suck in the upper lip. Just like the guy in the picture is doing... (Erkki does that and I saw it on half the VI INTp pictures.) But I have to admit that this guy can only be INTp if he was feeling very safe at that moment (eyes so big and so open).
EIE, ENFj, intuitive subtype.
E3 (probably 3w4)
Cool ILI hubbys are better than LSIs any time!
Old blog: http://firsttimeinusa.blogspot.com/
New blog: http://having-a-kid.blogspot.com/
6w5 sx
model Φ: -+0
sloan - rcuei
Either that, or near-sighted, and squinting to see betterOriginally Posted by implied
(latter would be me; but I'm XXXx, so I cannot say anything for INTp)
Originally Posted by implied
no it's not. But it looks even more like my brother. The brother does this face pretty often. It's too lively to be an INTp. INTps can demonstratively smile showing teeth, but it just looks so different! They are more likely to have small squinting evil cleaver eyes when they do that, not open and lively. They don't raise their eyebrows to show more expression, their eyes get even smaller to hive a hint of, "you don't know what I'm thinking of, nanananaa- nanaa"
EIE, ENFj, intuitive subtype.
E3 (probably 3w4)
Cool ILI hubbys are better than LSIs any time!
Old blog: http://firsttimeinusa.blogspot.com/
New blog: http://having-a-kid.blogspot.com/
I think most INTps have glasses...Originally Posted by emeye
(assumption, not a fact). They just read so much! Either that or they spend too much time at the computer. Which is also not good for the eyes.
Gilligan doesn't seem INTp-ish at all.(ps!, I'm not assuming that Gilligan doesn't read, I'm just saying he's not INTp)
EIE, ENFj, intuitive subtype.
E3 (probably 3w4)
Cool ILI hubbys are better than LSIs any time!
Old blog: http://firsttimeinusa.blogspot.com/
New blog: http://having-a-kid.blogspot.com/
6w5 sx
model Φ: -+0
sloan - rcuei
I agree, I have seen this sort of silliness on INTps and I have a picture somewhere of an INTp making a very similar funny face.Originally Posted by implied
“Life shrinks or expands in proportion to one's courage.”
― Anais Nin
hahaaha... good point. Let's just say - I could never VI asians.Originally Posted by implied
EIE, ENFj, intuitive subtype.
E3 (probably 3w4)
Cool ILI hubbys are better than LSIs any time!
Old blog: http://firsttimeinusa.blogspot.com/
New blog: http://having-a-kid.blogspot.com/
6w5 sx
model Φ: -+0
sloan - rcuei
Look at their clothes and mannerisms.
I would never be cought dead making a face like that. Let alone taking a photo like that!Originally Posted by Kim
Well, then I'll have to do that for you (fires up Photoshop)Originally Posted by Sycophant
XXXx <-- almost a beer
someone call the monster police!
and get me some goddamn robots!
asd