Quote Originally Posted by limNol View Post
For instance, take the ESE sp/sx and the ESE sx/so. Let's say they want to know their socionics types, so they log into the16types and make a type thread. Most likely, there will be a lot of different types being thrown around, some of their behaviors will flat-out contradict the widely-accepted notion of ESE, etc. When people try to type the ESE sp/sx, Si ego will probably be easier to pick up on, but things like EJ temperament, Fe leading, etc. will be a lot harder to pick up on. They might even get typed SEI or something, even if their actual function ordering is that of an ESE. But a systematic understanding of how EJ temperament, Fe leading, etc. manifest via sp/sx channels will shed a lot of light on the type of the individual in question.

Similarly, the ESE sx/so will probably be more stereotypically Fe-leading, but Si will probably be less apparent. They might be mistyped EIE or something, but once again, their function ordering is that of an ESE, and understanding how Si-creative manifests in an sx/so type will clear things up.
I am actually a so/sx ESE and I can see myself very similar to the other sp-last ESE that you mentioned here. High Fe (with solid resonance with EJ temperament) who fell into an EIE mistype for a long time. Not nearly as much Si as Fe, but fit the alpha quadra values quite well overall (vs. beta). Also, using the 2-subtype system, I would likely be an Fe-ESE (vs. the sp/sx ESE which would likely be an Si-ESE). So all this totally jibes with my own experience. As an sp-last ESE, I would undoubtedly prioritize everything slightly differently than an sp-dominant ESE.

All this makes sense!