Oldham seems pretty cool, but I don't like that it's an archetype-based system. I like my type systems articulated and permutative -- the more moving parts it has the better (which is why I use multiple systems in tandem). So I devised a system of declining identification to each of Oldham's four temperaments, kinda like the Enneagram trifix. For reference, the temperaments:
Idealist
Conscientious
Sensitive
Vigilant
Dramatic
Rationalist
Aggressive
Idiosyncratic
Inventive
Solitary
Traditionalist
Leisurely
Serious
Self-Sacrificing
Devoted
Hedonist
Self-Confident
Adventurous
Mercurial
Exuberant
http://ptypes.com/
http://webspace.webring.com/people/c...oldham.htm#LEI
My fix: Inventive > Self-Confident > Leisurely > Dramatic.





,
, etc.? Why cannot socionists use symbols Ne, Ni etc. as in MBTI? Just because they have somewhat different meaning. Socionics and MBTI, each in its own way, have slightly modified the original Jung's description of his 8 psychological types. For this reason,
(extraverted sensing) is first and foremost associated with control and expansion of personal space (which sometimes can manifest in excessive aagression, but often also manifests in a capability of managing lots of people and things).
Reply With Quote

And thank you