I'm not sure you can apply these generalizations hyper-literally across the board, but I feel some aspects of them do work.
(
http://www.the16types.info/vbulletin...e-descriptions)
(
http://www.socionics.us/wikisocion/Q...#Quadra_values)
When I say "overgrown child rolling around in blood and making scary clown faces at random" I mean to communicate something of his gestalt as a person. Manson seems to fit most of those attributes you describe. I don't see how my description paints him as defiant. I see an exploratory, process orientated bent to his work rather than the perhaps more pointed agenda I see with Beta NFs, thus the child rather than adolescent way of relating works better to me. I get a rather sensory bent to his work that I associate with Si.
Compare this video of his work:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rvf1DMDTosk
to Amanda Palmer, an ENFj:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=i62UF7uROGU
The energy is more apparent if you watch them both with the sound off. They've both got the pancake makeup, the glitzy costumes, and the same microphone, but their bearing seems quite different. Amanda is going to incite the party goers into a coup if they don't pass out in a frenzy first - she's got a pointed, devious quality to her. Manson is making love to his Lolita and rolling around in her blood in a way that I can only describe as
soft. He
is airy compared to Amanda, and pensive, almost sensuous.
I don't feel you're interpreting what I said in the way I meant it. You're criticizing your own projections, which may be an exercise in futility.