IEI-Fe or IEI-Ni?
EIE-Fe or EIE-Ni?
IEI-Fe or IEI-Ni?
EIE-Fe or EIE-Ni?
I believe that the Fe-subtype would generally be considered to "use more Se," simply because one may think of the complementary functions as such opposite approaches to the object that to strengthen one is to weaken the other (although that flattens it out, time-wise). But things like use of non-ego functions are idiosyncratic and individual, and really "use" is a sort of weak metaphor for how one interacts with functions both inside and outside of one's own psyche (I avoid the word 'ego' intentionally to reduce confusion), and so generalities of that kind are even less accurate than other generalities (in general *rimshot*).
Not a rule, just a trend.
IEI. Probably Fe subtype. Pretty sure I'm E4, sexual instinctual type, fairly confident that I'm a 3 wing now, so: IEI-Fe E4w3 sx/so. Considering 3w4 now, but pretty sure that 4 fits the best.
Yes 'a ma'am that's pretty music...
I am grateful for the mystery of the soul, because without it, there could be no contemplation, except of the mysteries of divinity, which are far more dangerous to get wrong.
IEI-Fe and EIE-Ni.IEI-Fe or IEI-Ni?
EIE-Fe or EIE-Ni?
Who uses more Se?
Perhaps those who thrive in the porn industry
ILE "Searcher"
Socionics: ENTp![]()
DCNH: Dominant![]()
--> perhaps Normalizing
![]()
Enneagram: 7w6 "Enthusiast"
MBTI: ENTJ "Field Marshall" or ENTP "Inventor"
Astrological sign: Aquarius
To learn, read. To know, write. To master, teach.
ILE "Searcher"
Socionics: ENTp![]()
DCNH: Dominant![]()
--> perhaps Normalizing
![]()
Enneagram: 7w6 "Enthusiast"
MBTI: ENTJ "Field Marshall" or ENTP "Inventor"
Astrological sign: Aquarius
To learn, read. To know, write. To master, teach.
I would also say this "extroverted" subtypes. For Fe subtype, it would seem that Fe and possibly Se is strengthened (possibly meaning, its not as possible for the other subtype) The other subtype, Ni and possibly Ti is strengthened. These are correlative to the idea and fact illustrating that idea, however, that subtype is mainly about the ego functions. In the case of duality, I would expect a creative subtype pair just as apt, like a mirror of the dominant subtype pair.
Interesting this stuff about being less averse to SLIs depending on the subtype.
From my personal experience, I have a childhood friend who is stereotypical SLI-Si, and we get along pretty well. He is kinda agressive and psychopath, probably due to strong uncounscious Se. I like his personality.
On the other hand, I have an SLI-Te uncle whom I can't stand. He is totally boring, not Se at all. Pure Si. Zero emotional expression... And I feel like he is always supervising me, ready to tell me to do something practical (Te) and physical (Si). My SLI-Si friend doesn't bother me at all. He just wants to enjoy the little pleasures, although he sometimes feels threatened by my Fe/Se intensity.
So, it seems that I'm WAY more open to my Si sub friend cause he uses more Se (me, as Ni sub, receiving well his strong Sensation). Another thing could be that we're both "Perceiving" subtypes, so we communicate mostly through our perceptive functions: Si, Se, Ni, Ne.
He is very goofy, uses a lot of suggestive Ne, which I think is hilarious combined with creative Te -> harsh communication.
DarkAngelFireWolf69 says that Duality isn't always a good match. To him, Supervision and even Conflict relationships are well-suited and interesting for self-development and connection between different Quadras.
Isfj and istj....(I dislike most isfj)
-
Dual type(as per tcaudilllg)
Enneagram 2w1sw(1w9) helps others to live up to their own standards of what a good person is and is very behind the scenes in the process.
Tritype 1-2-6 stacking sp/sx
I'm constantly looking to align the real with the ideal.I've been more oriented toward being overly idealistic by expecting the real to match the ideal. My thinking side is dominent. The result is that sometimes I can be overly impersonal or self-centered in my approach, not being understanding of others in the process and simply thinking "you should do this" or "everyone should follor this rule"..."regardless of how they feel or where they're coming from"which just isn't a good attitude to have. It is a way, though, to give oneself an artificial sense of self-justification. LSE
Best description of functions:
http://socionicsstudy.blogspot.com/2...functions.html
-
Dual type(as per tcaudilllg)
Enneagram 2w1sw(1w9) helps others to live up to their own standards of what a good person is and is very behind the scenes in the process.
Tritype 1-2-6 stacking sp/sx
I'm constantly looking to align the real with the ideal.I've been more oriented toward being overly idealistic by expecting the real to match the ideal. My thinking side is dominent. The result is that sometimes I can be overly impersonal or self-centered in my approach, not being understanding of others in the process and simply thinking "you should do this" or "everyone should follor this rule"..."regardless of how they feel or where they're coming from"which just isn't a good attitude to have. It is a way, though, to give oneself an artificial sense of self-justification. LSE
Best description of functions:
http://socionicsstudy.blogspot.com/2...functions.html
From my readings im pretty sure EIE uses more Se cause its hidden agenda, and in meged ovcharov aricle Fe subtypes use it more.
People with stronger S development have Se stronger and hence use it more (does not mean this is expressed in the open behavior though). With the same or different types.
In average, IEI should to have S weaker than EIE according to Jung.
Augustinavichiute thought other, but she could to mistake with the mixing of the conscious perception of the individ and the real situation, and also she did not take into account that valued functions factor.
Intype accents of functions should lead N shifted people to have weaker S.
Types examples: video bloggers, actors