Results 1 to 40 of 96

Thread: Both MBTI and Socionics are Correct?

Hybrid View

  1. #1
    Breaking stereotypes Suz's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2009
    Location
    On a chatbox diet
    TIM
    ESI maybe
    Posts
    6,479
    Mentioned
    173 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Saoshyant View Post
    Hmm, Aleksei, remind me how you are a Fe-dominant again? I get a big kick out of your self typing. Almost as strange as Gilly calling himself an ENFj.
    That would sort of explain all his wacky typings. (not to open a can of worms)
    Enneagram: 9w1 6w5 2w3 so/sx

  2. #2
    Coldest of the Socion EyeSeeCold's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2010
    Location
    Holy Temple of St. Augusta
    Posts
    3,682
    Mentioned
    6 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Of course Jung gave the means the dichotomize the types into J/P, but he did not describe exactly what kind of type would result from splitting types by I/E S/N T/F Rational/Irrational. Myers went ahead and dichotomized the types in terms of J/P by the secondary function that Jung mentioned. This was a roundabout way that complicated things as we see them now.
    (i)NTFS

    An ILI at rest tends to remain at rest
    and an ILI in motion is probably not an ILI

    31.9FM KICE Radio ♫ *56K Warning*
    My work on Inert/Contact subtypes

    Socionics Visual Identification(V.I.) Database
    Socionics Tests Database
    Comprehensive List of Socionics Sites


    Fidei Defensor

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •