Ethical Dilema

[Dioklecian]

If I tell someone's REAL type (let's say I am right), but that has social implications, should I or shouldn't I?

And if I tell and I am right and it helps the person, should I get a little reward or shouldn't I?

[Slacker]

With powers such as yours comes the responsibility to only ever use them for the greater good.

[Dioklecian]

With powers such as yours comes the responsibility to only ever use them for the greater good.

Thanks

What about rewards?

[Rocky]

To be honest, I think you need to relax a little bit. Lately you've been throwing around a lot of definitive statments about people (both on the board and on celebrities), and then taking them back. Basically, if you ever think that you are 100% right about something right away, you are probably wrong. So maybe if you are about to tell people about their types, you should try and explain the details of it and what it means carefully and see how receptive they are to the idea.

[Dioklecian]

To be honest, I think you need to relax a little bit. Lately you've been throwing around a lot of definitive statments about people (both on the board and on celebrities), and then taking them back. Basically, if you ever think that you are 100% right about something right away, you are probably wrong. So maybe if you are about to tell people about their types, you should try and explain the details of it and what it means carefully and see how receptive they are to the idea.

Thanks
In practice that is what happens, its' a process of negotiation rather than me dictating someone's type.

I say 100% as a form of rating. 50% is the smallest I can go and 100% the highest. I only say 100% if I have a list of people to type, its' just my little scale. If I am typing a specific individual I never say 100%.

However at some point I am satisfied that that is indeed the persons' type, and I won't move my defintion from there.

For instance Rmcnew is ISTP in my opinion no matter what he or anyone else might say.

Joy is ISFJ, etc.

But for Gilligan I am still wavering, at some point though I will decide on something.

What happens is that they have 2 opinion rather than 1 to choose from. So its' easy to change 1 mind but much more difficult to change 2 minds and synchronize them at the same time on the same type.

Checks and balances basiclly, but as I gather more and more evidence patterns and such, I become more useful.

Its' very dangerous as well because some people get upset at what I have to say , but basiclly I am like your second mind, "Il Consigliere" :wink:

[Joy]

that's it, you're grounded

[Dioklecian]

that's it, you're grounded

Do I get candy?

[Joy]

no, and no dinner for you either

[Dioklecian]

But really If I Really help someone, what reward can I expect?

[Ms. Kensington]

But really If I Really help someone, what reward can I expect?

you get:

dum dum dum


duimdumdum




dum dum dum




the warmth in your heart knowing you did something right. haha.

you seem really passionate what is your type, dio?

[Dioklecian]

But really If I Really help someone, what reward can I expect?

you get:

dum dum dum


duimdumdum




dum dum dum




the warmth in your heart knowing you did something right. haha.

you seem really passionate

Passionate about what?

[Ms. Kensington]

But really If I Really help someone, what reward can I expect?

you get:

dum dum dum


duimdumdum




dum dum dum




the warmth in your heart knowing you did something right. haha.

you seem really passionate

Passionate about what?

nothing in particular. you seem like a passionate, demonstrative person

[Dioklecian]

[nothing in particular. you seem like a passionate, demonstrative person

Its' my mother's influence i suspect, demonstrative how if I may ask?

[Joy]

you are imposing your opinions on others and then hoping to somehow obligate them to you. sound familiar?

[Joy]

and that is why you are grounded

[Dioklecian]

you are imposing your opinions on others and then hoping to somehow obligate them to you. sound familiar?

I don't impose, I suggest, there is a huge difference. My conclusions are mine, you don't have to share my opinions.

[Joy]

you are correct. I should have said "attempting to impose"

regardless... sound familiar?

[Dioklecian]

you are correct. I should have said "attempting to impose"

regardless... sound familiar?

Nope

[Joy]

think about an "ISFP" you know

[Creepy-pokeball]

If I tell someone's REAL type (let's say I am right), but that has social implications, should I or shouldn't I?

And if I tell and I am right and it helps the person, should I get a little reward or shouldn't I?

Go out and play And the answer is no to someone that does not understand the theory. It is not fair if they do not even know WTF youre communicating about. And if they do know the theory, inference goes a long way... Let one decide for themselves how they feel they should be and supply (support them with...) any information you may feel valuable. But please do not be so absolute.