Results 1 to 40 of 139

Thread: Most badass fictional character of each type

Threaded View

  1. #10
    Bananas are good. Aleksei's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2010
    Location
    The Rift
    TIM
    C-EIE, 7-4-8 sx/sp
    Posts
    1,624
    Mentioned
    2 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Divided View Post
    I'm not sure how you view the Information-Elements, and I don't want to derail your thread, but the reason I gave Alucard EIE is because he toyed with his enemies. Te efficiency was not a more primary concern. From that, he seemed more Fe+Ni over Fe+Si as well. He enjoyed fighting with his enemies and seemed to have a kind of Ni-creative vision about fighting that the ENTjs share. His lust for battle reminded me of Valhalla and King Leonidas from 300, who I confidently type ENFj. Why do you think LSE is a better typing? Here's a youtube link to show you what I'm talking about YouTube - Alucard in Action
    Alucard is very directive and commanding towards Seras, often laying out multi-step plans, aware of the stage he and the Hellsing Organization are in within the plan. He's also rather obsessed with technical details in a way only befitting a Logical function, with his long, drawn-out explanations of the functions of his weaponry. Explanations that... quite frankly sometimes kinda sound like audio erotica. Definite ego there. He does indeed like to toy with his prey, but the evidence itself weighs more heavily in favor of LSE - and if he were an E type, he'd be ESE rather than EIE.

    I do agree that King Leonidas was EIE, though.

    You might be right about Lara Croft. ESE was the last one for me to put a type in. I have a hard time even thinking of any fictional ESE characters, let alone a bad-ass one .
    ESEs abound in fiction. Badass ones aren't quite as common as badass EIEs, but they definitely exist. Some off the top of my head:

    Captain Jack Harkness
    Captain John Hart
    Patrick Bateman
    Alex DeLarge (Little Alex from the Clockwork Orange)
    Ladd Russo (Baccano).
    Last edited by Aleksei; 10-16-2010 at 11:17 PM.
    What do these signs mean—, , etc.? Why cannot socionists use symbols Ne, Ni etc. as in MBTI? Just because they have somewhat different meaning. Socionics and MBTI, each in its own way, have slightly modified the original Jung's description of his 8 psychological types. For this reason, (Ne) is not exactly the same as Ne in MBTI.

    Just one example: in MBTI, Se (extraverted sensing) is associated with life pleasures, excitement etc. By contrast, the socionic function (extraverted sensing) is first and foremost associated with control and expansion of personal space (which sometimes can manifest in excessive aagression, but often also manifests in a capability of managing lots of people and things).

    For this reason, we consider comparison between MBTI types and socionic types by functions to be rather useless than useful.

    -Victor DarkAngelFireWolf69, Dmitri Lytov

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •