Quote Originally Posted by labocat View Post
The Taciturn/Narrator functions:
Tt: Delta Te + Alpha Ti; Reasonable Logic
Tn: Beta Ti + Gamma Te; Resolute Logic
Nt: Alpha Ne + Beta Ni; Merry Intuition
Nn: Gamma Ni + Delta Ne; Serious Intuition
Ft: Beta Fe + Gamma Fi; Resolute Ethics
Fn: Delta Fi + Alpha Fe; Reasonable Ethics
St: Gamma Se + Delta Si; Serious Sensing
Sn: Alpha Si + Beta Se; Merry Sensing

Chains of types sharing ego T/N functions:
ESTj Acc-Tt INTj Cre-Nt ENFj Acc-Ft ISFj Cre-St ESTj
INFj Acc-Fn ESFj Cre-Sn ISTj Acc-Tn ENTj Cre-Nn INFj

ISTp Cre-Tt ENTp Acc-Nt INFp Cre-Ft ESFp Acc-St ISTp
ENFp Cre-Fn ISFp Acc-Sn ESTp Cre-Tn INTp Acc-Nn ENFp
Doesn't this imply that, at the disjunctive functional level, types as a whole function like other types combined?

Duality:
ISFp broken down equals Base ESTp Se and Creative ENFp Fi
ENTp broken down equals Base INFp Ni and Creative ISTp Te

That's duality but what about the Asymmetric relations and the types involved?

Supervision:
ENTp broken down equals Base INFp Ni and Creative ISTp Te
INFj broken down equals Base ESFj Fe and Creative ENTj Ne

Supervised at every point, the same goes for Benefit relations.
But what about the constituent types?

ENTp broken down equals Base INFp Ni and Creative ISTp Te
ESFj broken down equals Base INFj Fi and Creative ISTj Se

The Supervisor's Base function is in the same position as the Activator's Base.

Recognizing +/- implies Supervisor acts as combination of Activator and Quasi, likewise Activator and Quasi act partly as Supervisor. The same logic would apply to all types, but the focus here is on the Asymmetric Relations.

Supervisor = ½Activator + ½Quasi
Benefactor = ½Mirror + ½Conflict