Afaik, the top row is just Augusta's heat engine with +/- signs: +, -, +, -.
Ne (potential Energy) -> Te (conversion of potential to kinetic energy) -> Se (kinetic energy) -> Fe (conversion of kinetic to potential energy) -> Ne
I can only guess how he derived the bottom.
+Ti is in the creative function slot in his model, unless you want to dispute that.That's an entirely new introduction; not something that could have been read from the "model" you initially displayed. I think such a claim would create a model where the supervision ring defines the sequence of adjacent types. A slightly awkward claim considering people typically have a huge lot of difficulty emulating their supervisor.
I agree, but the bolded sounds like a minor disagreement about semantics with respect to the preferred alternative.That's what I usually do. Process/Result applied to a single function is Accepting/Creating and +/-. The Process/Result tag only means something in relation to combining functions into a block. I hope you're not implying that nasty practice of calling a type by it's base function alone that should be stamped out, punished and ridiculed on every oppurtune occasion.



Reply With Quote
