Looks like gibberish. How would you convince me that this is something more than just a meaningless random sequence? Any extra context on this?We should look at an alternative hypothesis regarding this. Here is DarkAngelFireWolf69's energy-model:
+Ne -> -Te -> +Se -> -Fe
+Ti -> -Ni -> +Fi -> -Si
That's an entirely new introduction; not something that could have been read from the "model" you initially displayed. I think such a claim would create a model where the supervision ring defines the sequence of adjacent types. A slightly awkward claim considering people typically have a huge lot of difficulty emulating their supervisor.-Ti becomes +Ti when creating
I don't see any way in which it would.Might that have something to do with limitting/empowering?
That's what I usually do. Process/Result applied to a single function is Accepting/Creating and +/-. The Process/Result tag only means something in relation to combining functions into a block. I hope you're not implying that nasty practice of calling a type by it's base function alone that should be stamped out, punished and ridiculed on every oppurtune occasion.He seems to be applying process/result to the whole ego block, rather than one function at a time.
Sounds like it would create a really ugly system with neither symmetry nor any common sense justification to it.It would establish certain similarities between you and your illusionary when in accepting mode, and between you and your supervisee when in creating mode.


Reply With Quote
