What makes asking/declaring especially interesting is, there is no convincing explanation for it in Model A. There is no corresponding function dichotomy:
That's because you need +/- and Focal/Diffuse to make sense of it. Welcome to the upper leagues, rookie.

Carefree/farsighted and yielding/obstinate can be explained with evaluatory/situational.
Tactical/strategic and constructivist/emotivist can be explained with inert/contact.
Evaluatory/situational and inert/contact don't have a workable definition. They are both random groupings of functions with nothing in common. You CAN however, explain Carefree/Farsighted, Tac/Strat, Obst/Comp and Emo/Const with a combination of T/F or N/S and Focal/Diffuse, focussing on their distribution over Strong/Weak or Valued/Unvalued functions. This is a slightly complicated procedure, so to explain it in detail would take up a bit more space that I'm willing to fill up with words right now.

In other words: Democratic/aristocratic, process/result, positivist/negativist and asking declaring truly add information to socionics which is not included in Model A...
They don't add information. It's +/- in combination with function attributes (object/field, focal/diffuse, rational/irrational, base/creative) that add the information. All you need is an understanding of +/- to make sense of three of these and the fourth is clarified by the addition of the easy to define and highly meaningful Focal/Diffuse dichotomy.