Results 1 to 35 of 35

Thread: Deep Secrets of Taciturn/Narrator (Asking/Declaring Reinin Dichotomy)

Threaded View

  1. #16
    Trevor's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Posts
    2,840
    Mentioned
    10 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    In these new "temperaments" that allow for micro type-changes what remains the same as in the old ones is the NTSF cyclicity of functions and stability of Rationality/Irrationality. So basically you have Negative/Taciturn/Rational, Positive/Narrator/Rational, Negative/Narrator/Irrational and Positive/Taciturn/Irrational "temperaments".

    For me, personally, the most interesting thing is: If you were to construct Positive/Negative functions, same way you constructed Taciturn/Narrator ones, and keeping the NTSF cyclicity of functions and the stability of Rationality/Irrationality, you'd get the same temperaments, of course, but where the order of types would be reversed. For example: In Negative/Taciturn/Rational group where functions would go from N(Neg) to T(Neg) to S(Neg) to F(Neg) and to N(Neg) again; types would go like this: ESTj=>ISFj=>ENFj=>INTj=>ESTj. Reversed.

    This reversibility should probably hold true for every small group designation of this kind(N>T>F>S). Saying probably because I haven't checked that out yet but have no major reasons for doubt.

    What good is to be found in this is yet to be seen. If any.
    Last edited by Trevor; 10-21-2010 at 09:18 AM.

Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •