I get the post #10 and I understand how it deals with potentially complementary relationships even with types that would teorethically be suboptimal. I don't understand post #11, could you clarify / make it more simple?
I get the post #10 and I understand how it deals with potentially complementary relationships even with types that would teorethically be suboptimal. I don't understand post #11, could you clarify / make it more simple?
Obsequium amicos, veritas odium parit