Taciturn/Narrator is the most underrated dichotomy in socionics.

It is a bit of a travesty that it is so poorly known and understood. Kind of like a cosmic error. Something that was not supposed to happen.

Socionics could have had a completely different face if this dichotomy had been found to be as important as it is at socionics' conception.

The question is just, how to tap into it's power. What is Taciturn/Narrator duality for starters? Is it stronger than Static/Dynamic duality or not? How should the Taciturn/Narrator functions be described?

These are all interesting questions.