Your denunciation of
+
as the attraction "to information that is factually accurate, aka scientifically proven" is misguided. Leading functions are nothing more than the information aspect a person is
most commonly receptive to and likely to reproduce. In the case of
, this equates to the libido's positive attitude toward that which is objective and the activity of said objects, or in other words, how something is "supposed to" behave, act, result in ect.
However, in accordance with the aforementioned, every objective phenomena has of course, it's own particular modes of operation; a framework so-to-speak. Therefore, we are presented with the question as to "what specific" information is being sought. Owing to the limits of human perception, all too common is the ready acceptance of that which does not actually coincide with science, as such. I know LSE's that harbor belief in God, or astrology and more often than not are they authorities within these spheres of interest. However, because the mind can perceive anything outside itself as objective, it means that the Bible and books on astrology are more than enough to satisfy the longings of a hungry
. whether or not it's scientifically accurate is of minor consequence, what matters is that are sources which exist outside the consciousness which serve as verification. A
dom, on the other hand, can content themselves with being their own authority on such matters, and are much more likely to devise their own opinions and ideological constructs which can serve as a basis for information.
Originally Posted by Maritsa33
) .
Reply With Quote
- 
easily and why I am brave...it sheds light on a lot of facts about ISTps in general so I recommend anyone who wants to know abt ISTps to read that entry.
)
