Typeless

[Joy]

I've been thinking about types, and how some people fit into specific types while others seem to be impossible to type, such as implied, rmcnew, and myself. This happens when people find themselves in situations that call for use of functions that would otherwise be weak, or when somebody changes a lot throughout his/her life. Whatever functions would have normally been strongest are lost amongst the others which haave become strong, effectively changing the "default" functions used in various situations. Once this happens, they are really no longer a specific "type".

[Dioklecian]

I've been thinking about types, and how some people fit into specific types while others seem to be impossible to type, such as implied, rmcnew, and myself.

ESFP ISTP ESFP as of last reckoning

[MysticSonic]

I don't know whyou think you're untypable, Joy. At the very least you're an alphite.

[Joy]

lol alphite

one would think so, however... check out my "type descriptions" thread

[Dioklecian]

I don't know whyou think you're untypable, Joy. At the very least you're an alphite.

You are COMPLETELY wrong Mysti

[MysticSonic]

Ok Dioklecian.

[Dioklecian]

Ok Dioklecian.

Thats right, for all the times that you have put me down for no reason :wink:

[MysticSonic]

[Transigent]

Edited for gayness.

[Joy]

things like this don't always remain consistant though, and many times I don't know what I want or how I feel or whatever. I'm not the only one! If there is no real consistancy of preference of functions, then how can that person be typed?

[Dioklecian]

things like this don't always remain consistant though, and many times I don't know what I want or how I feel or whatever. I'm not the only one! If there is no real consistancy of preference of functions, then how can that person be typed?

There are ways, but if I tell I would have to ....you :wink:

[Transigent]

Edited for gayness.

[Joy]

like that ESFps are hyper and stupid and ISFps are weak and fearful and ESTjs are dumb and closed minded and ENFjs have huge tits and ESFjs love to cook?

[Dioklecian]

like that ESFps are hyper and stupid and ISFps are weak and fearful and ESTjs are dumb and closed minded and ENFjs have huge tits and ESFjs love to cook?

ESFPs are not hyper nor stupid. They are optimists and illogical.

[Joy]

you're doing a pretty shitty job at making a case about my type

[implied]

[Joy]

I've been ridiculous or others have? I've only claimed 3 types... ENTp, then ESFp for like a week until I learned more about functions, and that led me to ISFp.

[Dioklecian]

you're doing a pretty shitty job at making a case about my type

Thats' my ESFP girl

[Transigent]

Edited for gayness.

[Dioklecian]

Dioklecian is a fucking tard face if he thinks either Joy or Implied is ESFp.

That's all I have to say.

SAYING IT 1000000 TIMES DOESNT MAKE IT TRUE DIOKLECIAN!

How much are you willing to bet Trany?

[Transigent]

Edited for gayness.

[Dioklecian]

Dioklecian is a fucking tard face if he thinks either Joy or Implied is ESFp.

That's all I have to say.

SAYING IT 1000000 TIMES DOESNT MAKE IT TRUE DIOKLECIAN!

How much are you willing to bet Trany?

I know her type already you dumbfuck. You haven't gotten close yet.

Whose type ******? You mentioned two peeps.

[Joy]

yeah... ISFps can learn to be bold. And I'm not totally set on ISFp, it's just what makes the most sense to me. Honestly, the only reason I think peter and I are ISFp and ENTp instead of ESFp and INTp is because of the quadras. I get along too well with alpha and too poorly with gamma to think I'm gamma, and no I'm not just basing this off the people in this forum. I can VI an ENTj faster and more confidently than any other type, and it's because I feel quite uncomfortable around them.

[Dioklecian]

yeah... ISFps can learn to be bold. And I'm not totally set on ISFp, it's just what makes the most sense to me. Honestly, the only reason I think peter and I are ISFp and ENTp instead of ESFp and INTp is because of the quadras. I get along too well with alpha and too poorly with gamma to think I'm gamma, and no I'm not just basing this off the people in this forum. I can VI an ENTj faster and more confidently than any other type, and it's because I feel quite uncomfortable around them.

Go on, brainwash yourself, its' ok. There was an ESFP here in the forum that was certain she was ESFJ because she wqs married to an INTJ. An ISFP would never change HER type, she would change the man, (or son)

[Transigent]

Edited for gayness.

[Dioklecian]

Whose type ******? You mentioned two peeps.

Oh, I have no idea what implied could be...

Joy's type has been pretty clear almost from day one though. It's probably best that nobody will be able to figure it out.

Wana pm me? If I agree with you I will write a poem, an ode to your greatness and have EVERYONE on the forum read it.

[Transigent]

Edited for gayness.

[Dioklecian]

Wana pm me? If I agree with you I will arite a poem, an ode to your greatness and have EVERYONE on the forum read it.

Go crawl back into the hole you came from.

Are you scared mama's boy?

[Transigent]

Edited for gayness.

[Joy]

people who use words like "never" sound generally sound rather unintelligent

[implied]

[Dioklecian]

Wana pm me? If I agree with you I will write a poem, an ode to your greatness and have EVERYONE on the forum read it.

lol.

you have got to be kidding.

Kidding how? I am honest, if I think he is right its' more important than admiting an error. An error in thinking is disgusting and needs to be purged out of existence.

[Joy]

wow

let me ask you something... how did you go about typing your prototypes?

[Dioklecian]

Wana pm me? If I agree with you I will arite a poem, an ode to your greatness and have EVERYONE on the forum read it.

Go crawl back into the hole you came from.

Are you scared mama's boy?

Terrified! You know me, afraid of my own shadow.

So, spill it out, or is it a bluff?

[Dioklecian]

people who use words like "never" sound generally sound rather unintelligent

Yes they sound sounding the sound

[Joy]

Dioklecian, I think a lot of people have pretty much agreed to disagree with you on people's types.

[Dioklecian]

wow

let me ask you something... how did you go about typing your prototypes?

Me or ******?

[Joy]

you

and btw... let's not forget the point of this thread... there are people who are typeless, and I am one of them

[Dioklecian]

Dioklecian, I think a lot of people have pretty much agreed to disagree with you on people's types.

And? I make mistakes, so?

[Dioklecian]

you

and btw... let's not forget the point of this thread... there are people who are typeless, and I am one of them

I have no prototypes, or archetypes, I have truth baby

And there are NO typeless peeeps, forget it.