and im thinkin this guy is ENFp
VI these two girl fo meh!
and im thinkin this guy is ENFp
top pic left: isfj
top pic right: enfp
i would like to hear what other people think because my photo vi sucks
LII
that is what i was getting at. if there is an inescapable appropriation that is required in the act of understanding, this brings into question the validity of socionics in describing what is real, and hence stubborn contradictions that continue to plague me.
the top right isn't extorverted, she's kind of cold...well she has a wall up most of the time
i see no wall
LII
that is what i was getting at. if there is an inescapable appropriation that is required in the act of understanding, this brings into question the validity of socionics in describing what is real, and hence stubborn contradictions that continue to plague me.
c'mon ppls!!!!!!!!! help meh!!!!!!!
ISFP
ISTP
IxFJ
ISxx or INxx, not sure which.
Does the second one tend to make MST3K-style jokes?
I'm guessing, but the one on the left in the first picture has
the one on the left ISFx (no! not a scroostype!!!)
Alternately the one on the left (the first one) could be xxFP... I'm not that sure. She does have a curious resemblance to Marth Stewart....
First photo left one looks like my big crush of primary school...ISFx
Obsequium amicos, veritas odium parit
lol I'm glad I'm not the only oneOriginally Posted by FDG
ENTj - intuitive subtype - 8w9, sp/sx
Three.lol I'm glad I'm not the only one
So I still say ISFP.
I think Rocky's conclusions make the most sense. Although the one on the left seems a bit T at times...I'm moving in with her so we will see what happens.
You guys all suck at VI, because the one time I did it with a girl I know, you called her an ISTp or ISTj. She is ESFp to the max. But if it amuses you, as it does me, then go right ahead.
Posts I wrote in the past contain less nuance.
If you're in this forum to learn something, be careful. Lots of misplaced toxicity.
~an extraverted consciousness is unable to believe in invisible forces.
~a certain mysterious power that may prove terribly fascinating to the extraverted man, for it touches his unconscious.
Keep blabbering nonsense.
Obsequium amicos, veritas odium parit
it is amusing. and you are istp.
LII
that is what i was getting at. if there is an inescapable appropriation that is required in the act of understanding, this brings into question the validity of socionics in describing what is real, and hence stubborn contradictions that continue to plague me.
Me?
Obsequium amicos, veritas odium parit
i love how everyone is hyper sensitive when types get thrown around. no, you are isfjMe?
LII
that is what i was getting at. if there is an inescapable appropriation that is required in the act of understanding, this brings into question the validity of socionics in describing what is real, and hence stubborn contradictions that continue to plague me.
Likewise...Keep blabbering nonsense.
Posts I wrote in the past contain less nuance.
If you're in this forum to learn something, be careful. Lots of misplaced toxicity.
~an extraverted consciousness is unable to believe in invisible forces.
~a certain mysterious power that may prove terribly fascinating to the extraverted man, for it touches his unconscious.
Posts I wrote in the past contain less nuance.
If you're in this forum to learn something, be careful. Lots of misplaced toxicity.
~an extraverted consciousness is unable to believe in invisible forces.
~a certain mysterious power that may prove terribly fascinating to the extraverted man, for it touches his unconscious.
LIKE WISE WHAT??Likewise...Keep blabbering nonsense.
SPEAK OUT LOUD!
Obsequium amicos, veritas odium parit
LIKE WISE WHAT??Likewise...Keep blabbering nonsense.
SPEAK OUT LOUD!
http://the16types.info/forums/viewtopic.php?t=2764
It's an old thread, and the photo was linked, and not my own anyways, so there's no verification. ANd I suppose you, FDG, weren't a part of it. But all of those people were quite wrong, espcially in regards to the "ISTJ" that was supposedly on the left.
That thread is what I was refering to. I thought you posted in the thread, and were challenging the correctness of you "ISTJ" attribution. But you did not post there, so it doesn't really involved you.
Posts I wrote in the past contain less nuance.
If you're in this forum to learn something, be careful. Lots of misplaced toxicity.
~an extraverted consciousness is unable to believe in invisible forces.
~a certain mysterious power that may prove terribly fascinating to the extraverted man, for it touches his unconscious.
AgreedThree.lol I'm glad I'm not the only one
So I still say ISFP.
Well I am back. How's everyone? Don't have as much time now, but glad to see some of the old gang are still here.
Other girl is ISTJ
Well I am back. How's everyone? Don't have as much time now, but glad to see some of the old gang are still here.
Posting Permissions
Reply With Quote