View Poll Results: Sigmund Freud's type?

Voters
8. You may not vote on this poll
  • ILE (ENTp)

    3 37.50%
  • SEI (ISFp)

    0 0%
  • ESE (ESFj)

    0 0%
  • LII (INTj)

    1 12.50%
  • SLE (ESTp)

    0 0%
  • IEI (INFp)

    0 0%
  • EIE (ENFj)

    0 0%
  • LSI (ISTj)

    0 0%
  • SEE (ESFp)

    0 0%
  • ILI (INTp)

    1 12.50%
  • LIE (ENTj)

    0 0%
  • ESI (ISFj)

    0 0%
  • IEE (ENFp)

    0 0%
  • SLI (ISTp)

    1 12.50%
  • LSE (ESTj)

    1 12.50%
  • EII (INFj)

    1 12.50%
Multiple Choice Poll.
Results 1 to 40 of 138

Thread: Sigmund Freud

Hybrid View

  1. #1
    &papu silke's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2011
    Posts
    5,077
    Mentioned
    456 Post(s)
    Tagged
    3 Thread(s)

    Default

    LII-Ti sx/sp 6w5 or 5w6

    Judging from his statements Freud had a proclivity to state his own thoughts as if they were universal all-evident maxims, which implies Ji in mental ring, making IJ type be more plausible than an EJ one.

    All of the left/result benefit and supervision rings are subject to something called reverse benefit/supervision, which doesn't quite work the same way as the classical descriptions of benefit and supervision. Freud's patronizing relationship with Jung, the way he referred to Jung's research into paranormal events as "spook-complex" and tried to reform him into his "appointed son" all fall in line with this type of "reverse" relations. By experience I know that Ti-LIIs are especially prone to it in relation to IEIs.

    So I'd go with Ti-LII Freud and e6 by enneagram, assuming Jung was 9 and that 9 serves as both the point of integration and the point of bafflement for a 6.
    Last edited by silke; 05-13-2014 at 02:11 AM.

  2. #2

    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    TIM
    Ni-IEI-N 4w3 sx/so
    Posts
    8,869
    Mentioned
    46 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    yeah I've gotten that feeling from LIIs in the past; it's always this softened paternal dissonance, eased mainly by Fe spurts. also I've never found myself taking as much issue with their concave theoretical attitude, like I almost expect and somewhat appreciate this kind of unwavering solidity; this seems to hold true for jung, as his main issues with freud were interpersonal, a critique of style almost.

    jung was either a 9 or a 5. the latter seems a bit more likely, given his archetypal uncanniness as far as IEIs go, essentially 'that one,' the true vortex. this could work with 9 if he wasn't so clearly impassioned and single-minded in his mystic pursuits, especially considering he's probably sx/sp.
    4w3-5w6-8w7

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •