Block Of ego*y-ya pozitsiya*Programmnaya function * "volitional sensorika"
For the man of this type are characteristic the volitional protection of its own interests (and of the interests of "their command"), the protection of its own priority by any price. But not for the purpose of direct and merciless suppression, but for the maximum realization of its own creative and ethical potential, for the most complete expression of its own bright individuality, for the realization of its own ethical purposes and tasks.
Therefore the ratio of forces in the system of the values of Caesar - this is first of all the competition of personal achievements and successes. To Caesar is important the acknowledgement of his personal merits importantly the acknowledgement of his authority through the realization of his personal qualities acknowledgement by his most sensitive and most thoughtful leader, by the most energetic and most active acknowledgement by his most loyal and most reliable friend acknowledgement by his best and most unsurpassed in his kind worker.
No matter by what it neither would be occupied, whatever activity for itself nor selected. Caesar always poses for himself the problem of being best of the good by himself purpose very praiseworthy and deserving respect, but from other side - what physical forces he is worthwhile to live entire life as on the sport contest being constantly examined to the rivals, constantly comparing its own successes with the strange achievements, constant stress in the eternal tendency to be pulled out forward and not to yield superiority.
Caesar tries easily and rapidly to attain the stated goals Uvlechenno being occupied by the selected matter, without considering those spent for achievement of success by efforts, Caesar it is capable to the exceptional fitness for work and on any, even contradicting the common sense victims. (for example, one of the representatives of this type, the beginning singer "placed" to itself voice, being occupied simultaneously in three instructors of vokala unfortunately, result it did not justify the spent efforts.)
Without a moment's hesitation about that which risks to seem by boastful, Caesar at every turn "reports" about his achievements, sometimes sufficiently sincerely being surprised so that others lag behind his "model" rates: "as, you yet did not make this task? But 4 already following I make!" It seemingly proposes in any matter "to be equal" to it. And in fact, why no? Caesar magnificently knows how to impose the spirit of creative competition and business activity on the most passive and most indifferent to the general enthusiasm person. It will force to podsuyetit'sya the most passive and the inactive (what extreme point of samootstranennosti and passiveness would reach its dual Balzac, if not exceptional enthusiasm and the hyper-activity of Caesar)
Caesar always condemns and blames passiveness, absence of initiative, retreat from the selected plans in the people. It cannot be said so that Caesar would clearly encourage the skill "to work by elbows" - it is faster, it encourages the skill "to fight, to search for, to find and not to surrender". Caesar does not respect those, who pass before the difficulties. He always for the active stand in life, for the active search for the solutions sometimes the methods, which he proposes for the solution of problems, appear somewhat rectilinear. Not that so that it would propose to go and to break into the closed doors (although this also is not excluded), to defend its rights by any possible method, to attain that outlined with any conditions, this already without fail.
To Caesar it is actually important to know, what problems are solved by the method of volitional pressure, and what are not. Therefore, giving advice, to which, possibly, it itself and did not follow, Caesar makes this of the considerations of obtaining information with the important for himself, "program" aspect of "volitional sensoriki". where it is possible "to press", while where - it is cannot.
In the estimation of potential rivals Caesar first of all in exactly the same manner examines the ability of man to resist the exerted to it pressure, and also the skill to postoyat' for himself and readiness to give immediate rebuff frequently confident in his power superiority or feeling, that the situation "works" on it, Caesar can himself allow "trial falling out" to the side of that, its whose power potential it now interests. The absence of immediate protection sometimes directs it at the erroneous thought, that man is not generally to it capable. Sometimes such prompt conclusions lead it to the very unpleasant situations.
To Caesar it is extremely unpleasant, when him they publicly "put in place" - this understates its self-appraisal. Is still more absurd the situation, when any generally unfamiliar person for the incomprehensible reasons it attacks. In this case Caesar feels himself very lost. Unfortunately, he is not always capable to rapidly take control over his feelings and to quietly and solidly require explanations.
Caesar can vividly, sometimes provocatively "state" about himself. He can defy society, it can take to himself the scandalous stage means: for it this not is more than the expression of its own creative individuality. Much more than it disturbs the absence of interest in itself. Unwillingness to note its clearly expressed abilities, unwillingness to recognize its success, unwillingness to obey its leadership.
Caesar first of all of men of action. Therefore especially painfully it receives any limitation of its activity. (problem, which it fairly often encounters, since its activity bears sufficiently contradictory and confused nature.) Its activity assumes wide spread and scale of measures.
It is exceptionally initiative-taking, it can literally "break" into the strange life, in the strange relations, because of what the impression of insolent person and impudent person frequently is produced. Frequently there is bestseremonen and it is obtrusive.
In the tendency to take initiative by any price Caesar frequently appears far from in better shape, because of what sometimes he falls into awkward situation, it is sometimes simply it is pitiful or ridiculous. (about which do not give god to it to say.) There is nothing sicker for Caesar than to see that all its efforts to conquer (precisely to conquer) the authority, popularity or arrangement, lead to the diametrically opposite results. To the honor of Caesar, he knows how to recognize the fact of his own errors and is capable to publicly recognize his fault, although possibly this to it is given more heavily than by other.
It would be incorrect to say that his ambitions were important for Caesar first of all. The incomprehension of its good intentions is much more offensive for it. In its right to the leadership Caesar it is completely sincerely confident. Therefore the nonrecognition of its priority for it is deeply offensive, since this first of all nonrecognition of its merits, it honest selfless, creative, with the complete return of the forces of labor. If Zhukov has leadership - this is the strategic calculation, where any jamming of its ambitions is received as hostile falling out. Caesar, in contrast to Zhukov, fights not for self assertion of his own ambitions, but for the right to justify the confidence entrusted to it. Simply stated, if to Zhukov is important the sensation of his real authority. To Caesar importantly voluntary acknowledgement and confidence. To Zhukov it is important to take authority. To Caesar it is important to hold leadership. If authority is necessary to Zhukov, in order to head system, then to Caesar in order first of all to maximally realize its creative ethical potential, to democratize the system headed by it, to ethical improve it. If we zhukovskaya strategy - tendency take all spheres of influence, then for Caesar it is important to take "supremacy" in all spheres of its activity: personal merits, in his opinion, even more greatly convince surrounding in its right to the leadership.
If Zhukov always rigidly checks the seized sphere of influence, then Caesar does not always note that he generally took some space.
(it should be noted that the comparison of the program functions of Zhukov and Caesar is given for the explanation of fundamental differences in them "volitional sensorikakh", but completely not in order to indicate, who of them a "good" leader, but who "poor" - in each of them his social function, necessary for the realization in the specific situation and under the specified public conditions.)
Behavior of Caesar first of all are characterized by rapidity and energetic nature, immediate and comprehensive initiative. Caesar for himself unnoticeably fills entire surrounding space. He does not always note, are not always evaluated the methods, which he uses for the fastest achievement of the sympathies: to it is more important to hold his authority, and for this he is ready honest and to ethically work out the undertaken himself obligations.
The problem of Caesar also in the fact that in contrast to Zhukov, who always knows, "as is must". Caesar distinctly knows only "as not must". With all his exceptional talents Caesar is faster destroyer, than creator. In the policy he is the destroyer of totalitarian and authoritarian systems. In the skill he - daring innovator, who subverts the existing to it kept balance forms. He can be the founder of new direction in the skill, which no one besides it and to continue will be able. To imitate - as much as desired, to continue - no. Among the representatives of this type frequently are encountered bright creative individualities, thoroughly gifted personalities.
The discrepancy "volitional sensoriki" Caesar consists in very democratism of his autocracy. Caesar sincerely hates tyranny and despotism, it from those, whose name they write "on the fragments of samovlast'ya". And at the same time it by all means attempts not to be inferior its influence. The acknowledgement of its own defeat in this plan for it is especially agonizing. Attempt with any price to hold its influence frequently brings Caesar k. to desperate and contradictory behavior, which have for it frequently tragic consequences.
Block EGO * 2-4 pozitsiya*Tvorcheskaya function * the "ethics of relations"
Any ethical relations Caesar first of all constructs from the positions of volitional sensoriki. I.e., however they were developed, Caesar in any event must remain leader. Caesar is deeply convinced that also the first and last word in the development of relations they must remain after it. It is always absolutely confident in its right to check any ethical situation, regardless of the fact, it is in it main face or secondary.
In spite of comparatively strong ethical installations, and besides, that the ethics of relations - its strong creative function, it cannot be said so that the ethical relations in Caesar would be added easily. To Caesar generally nothing it is given easily, because it everything always conquers. The problem of Caesar in the fact that it frequently conquers that the fact that in it no one disputes. It, to its misfortune, has a habit to conquer that that also so belongs to it precisely rightfully.
It would seem that it interfere withs Caesar simply and natural to receive its natural attractiveness, its charm, ease and freedom in the contact. But in that and misfortune, that to Caesar is necessary a constant and general acknowledgement of these qualities. Moreover, for it are necessary the proofs of the acknowledged superiority, proof of its unquestionable influence moreover precisely in pursuit of these proofs it and teaches to lose entire its "kingly" sublimity sometimes it is created impression, that it precisely asserts itself to the compliments, by force and inappropriately "pulls" to itself attention, is fascinated by the egotism
And in the region of ethics to Caesar having insufficiently polupobed only appeared, it must charm all, obayat' all, "light" all, interest all or, if it is necessary, to intrigue all.
But even if is located someone, whom it is in no way interested to itself to arrange, then only because this person it simply for itself in no way examines, it for it, simply speaking, "empty place".
It is not surprising that Caesar teaches with this ethics of behavior (independent of the scales of his activity) to gain to itself is numerous enemies. Moreover relations according to diagram friend - enemy in it are also constructed very contrastingly and inconsistently: yesterday's enemy today "gracious" starts into the number of friends, because "so it is must", today's friend, who pays more attention to another subject, no longer friend, but "traitor". (Caesar, perhaps, only, who in third kvadre divides relations into the "enemies" and "friends" - Dreiser it divides into "its" and "strangers", but intuity- logicians about this not at all think)
Specifically, because the ethics of relations in Caesar is formed under the effect of volitional sensoriki (more precise, it it realizes), maximalism is its distinguishing feature. But, self-evidently, the ethics of Caesar cannot and it must not be sequential: realization function - always manipulation, always such, what is necessary to the program of intellect. In the case of Caesar volitional sensorika - aspect firm, program, and ethics of relations only shapes the "arrangement of forces": changes power relationship - it changes and ethics. To those, whom Caesar respects and whose arrangement attains, one relation, to those, whom "in the half copeck coin it does not place", another. In that and the problem of the ethics of Caesar, the secret of fastest nazhivaniya by them enemies - in its inconsistent ethical maximalism.
As for a long time Caesar "zastrevayet" in the phase of hostility or friendship, he depends only on concrete situation. But of course Caesar will not step back, until he explains it for himself finally, it is more precise, it will step back, only being convinced that the relations finally were pulled down also he does not have chances to correct them. (to correct, in understanding of Caesar, means again to conquer authority. It is unimportant that precisely it makes - it does request forgiveness or is arranged the scandal: this is not more than means "to straighten" situation in any manner.)
Etichnost' of Caesar, already in view of its manipulativeness, always relative, in spite of strong ethical installations. I.e., Caesar completely can realize into some of the defined situation, which enters badly (moreover, it it always knows, how it is necessary to enter), but in it is always located "convincing" justification to its own unethical behavior. Neetichnost' in behavior of others Caesar always notes, but far from always he condemns and even in regard to this it does not always speak out. To the honor of Caesar it is necessary to recognize that it is capable to relate with the humor to the strange ethical imperfections.
Constantly it fights for the expansion of the sphere of its ethical influence. It it is possible to consider its kind by "ethical aggressor". But the actions of Caesar in the zone of their influence are confused, inconsistent and it is often unethical. Constantly changes ethical tactics, change "agents", change friend- enemies, the centers of volitional pressure and emotional action constantly displace. Caesar least of all realizes, that entire proceeding - this is only reaction to its some concrete actions. The more it fusses, the more the situation incandesces, the more it loses strategic orientators in its ethical relations. Finally it entirely is tangled, who to it is now whom, and here he already conducts his ethical "close battle", his some narrow-gauge "shuttle" diplomacy, some primitive poludetskiye intrigues. It is similar, no one knows how so "creatively" to spoil its relations, as this succeeds for Caesar himself.
In any event, no matter how estimated its behavior, Caesar sincerely wants "so that all would be as better". He actually tries as possible better everything to settle so that all would be contented by him, he tries for all to be good. This position leads either to the contradictory actions from its side or to the absence of any decisive actions, which only aggravates its ethical problems.
Block Of superego*e-ya position * normative function * the "intuition of possibilities"
Program "volitional sensorika" constantly requires information on the aspect "intuition of possibilities". To Caesar it is necessary to most accurately estimate possibilities and abilities of each person, entering the circle of his contact, since its own idea about the success in it is erected relative to potential possibilities and successes of its environment.
To Caesar it is always important to know, on what stage of the realization of their plans his surrounding people are located. For example, in the process of studies Caesar constantly is interested, it does not lag behind others in the fulfillment of training targets. Moreover, he always tries to return work to some of the first, he tries to focus attention of instructors on itself, to create the impression of promising specialist about itself.
In any situation Caesar is previously interested in positive possibilities. For example, even to the end of studies he tries to explain all possible versions of the distribution of work sites, he searches for for himself some useful business connections, it is interested in the possibilities of other students.
For obtaining it the information interesting it develops high activity, time finds to have a talk with each about the plans for the future. In this case he tries to take the locating to the revelation "sincere" tone, confidence lamenting to some its yet not solved problems. Frequently opinions on the question of interest to him are gathered on the threshold of the dynamism, it is advised many, but in the final analysis everything are done in its own way.
He tries to produce the impression of man of foresighted and reasonable. Greatly it loves, when it they are advised, share their plans, although it does not always have enough patience to listen collocutor. Sometimes he tries to produce the impression of man, whom everything about all knows, (sometimes even too it hurries to report the information, which he allegedly knows.) It loves to produce the impression of man, who in the course of all events, sometimes can hint, which in it "everything is gripped". Frequently, clearly exaggerating, he speaks about his influence. Away not to fib or "to poblefovat'".
For Caesar it is very important from the very beginning of contact to determine the potential of the man: sometimes Caesar evaluates man relative to his subjective abilities, sometimes - relative to the place occupied by it in the society, sometimes - in appearance.
On the basis of the approximate estimation of situation and potential of characters Caesar sometimes makes possible for himself sufficiently far to exceed the scope of the permissible ethical standards. The intuition of potential possibilities prompts to it, to whom and as it is possible to relate, who and as itself povedet, who is capable to postoyat' for itself, but who is not.
Sometimes Caesar allows for himself the very causing behavior, which in it is called "to speak truth into the eyes". But since the concept about the truth Caesar has its very relative (at least because this is its personal point of view), most precise (from a psychological point of view) explanation to "searches of truth" - this nothing else but desire ethical and intuitively "to probe" situation. The desire to learn, will descend to it from the hands that that it now makes, and as they will react to this "truth into the eyes".
Caesar will not carry uncertainty. Therefore sometimes he specially accelerates the crisis of situation in order to make a new arrangement of forces in it and to understand its place in relation system. To understand, who there is who, as him they receive and after whom "him hold".
To the happiness for itself (and its duala of Balzac), under the conditions of the uncertainty of relations Caesar is not always locked on one partner during this period it it can open for itself the "second front". Subconsiously that disposed to the vulnerable ethics of the emotions of Balzac, Caesar is scared to explain those relations, which it especially values, it fears emotionally "to press" to the partner. Therefore for redistributing the superfluous emotional activity to it is necessary its kind the "fallback position", which it distracts and it makes that with less dependent on the "basic version."
The tactics of the "second front" forces Caesar to deceive by cunning, to use cunning, to be twisted out from the awkward situations, but it entire this does not love - to it this is inconvenient: this degrades its merit, it contradicts its ethical principles, the main things from which - decency, honesty and devotion. Furthermore, the weak intuition of the possibilities for it of this does not allow: it always fears conviction in the lie, fears, which will involuntarily give out itself, which will let out a secret, that this will become some means known to its partner. And nevertheless, since it is not always capable to consecutively relations with all its partners, the uncertainty of situation frequently forces it to maneuver between them - it simply does not see for itself another output.
The analysis of the possibilities of situation in Caesar frequently is too surface or too optimistic, since it assembles information not of the very authoritative sources and evaluates by its not most critical means. For example, many representatives of this type unconditionally believe to the media, even if those extend completely improbable rumors.
Sometimes Caesar develops the role of person, who confidently looks in the future, vidyashchego for himself and for others the mass of possibilities. Frequently he and itself in this case is inspired and tries to inspire those surrounding. However, after encountering with the first real, objective obstacles, about his "enthusiasm" he forgets in the manner that as if it and not it was never. Then the feverish search for possible output from the difficult situation already begins.
Error on the aspect of the "intuition of possibilities" bypasses Caesar very dearly: at best - these are the separate unpleasant situations, into which it risks to fall, in the worse - this is the crash of entire its quarries. Therefore Caesar greatly tries not to make anything such, which subsequently would be wrapped up against it. And although it never is to the end confident in its intuition, nevertheless it attempts it to constantly develop in order to have the capability to error-free on it rely.
The most complete aid on this aspect Caesar nevertheless obtains from his duala of Balzac, who not only knows how to foresee the most unfavorable course of events, but also it can in the soft and delicate form warn against possible troubles. But the method to avoid them at the same time and will prompt.
Block Of superego*ya-ya Position * Mobilization Function * The "logic Of relationships"
To Caesar it is difficult to be objective, since it find in the captivity of its ethical installations, its sympathies and antipathies.
Its behavior can contradict the common sense at least because most frequently they reflect its emotional relation to proceeding.
Sometimes in Caesar kak's behavior displaces the logical significance of his behavior, i.e. it enters in spite of the common sense, being based to some primitive logical stereotypes only because "it is so accepted to act". Moreover, being guided by its logical stereotypes, it frequently acts to the detriment of its ethical principles: for example, it destroys the prevailing good relations with its close ones only because it reacts in the manner that it is accepted logically, on the general concepts, but not in the manner that he this feels ethical: let us say, it scolds for first, for which it is necessary (in the conventional, stereotype understanding) to scold, it praises for that, for which it is necessary to praise.
Sometimes this is expressed in the habit to use surface logical (and ethical) stereotypes, to act in accordance with these slogans and to utter them apropos and without the occasion: "pity degrades man", "they fear - it means they respect", "it is jealous - it means it loves", "where postelil, there and sleep", "woman must not display initiative", etc.
Sometimes these are the logically displaced intonations and accents in the speech. Sometimes this is the ethical unjustified mimicry.
Sometimes these are the displaced or unstable interests in the received information. For example: listening to explanations, Caesar frequently is distracted from the basic idea, him suddenly they begin to interest some completely secondary moments or unessential details. It is unnoticeable for itself, it moves away from basic theme or distracts by questions of secondary significance. Or by the questions, which do not completely refer to the discussed object.
One additional characteristic for the representatives of this type the feature: ability apropos and without the occasion to be distracted from the assigned theme to the conversations about itself. (obvious case - Pushkin's lyric retreats in the "Yevgeny Onegin".)
To be occupied by the classification of concepts or knowledge, to put them into the ordered system - for Caesar dull and mutornaya work. To it it is difficult to be concentrated at the logical analysis of any phenomenon, it is difficult to be concentrated for the sequential understanding of logical conclusions, it is difficult to very to present anything consecutively: it can begin explanation directly from the middle and continue it, constantly returning to the initial and intermediate stages. Thus, in the account of Caesar some even simple explanations are very intricate.
The superficiality of ideas about its many phenomena does not confuse - it considers this natural ("we everything they learned gradually anything and somehow") the main thing so that the discussed object would be although otdalenno, with sign, it is not possible to produce the impression of complete incompetence.
It is very careful in the statements, which are concerned the lawful or technical aspect of the matter, it does not risk to seem by nonobjective or incompetent
It does not love to study instruction and rule - to it this is boring. (representative of this type it can repeatedly burn through electric appliance, including it, without having become acquainted with the instruction it is known the case of "unsuccessful" cleaning of the memory of computer, after which proved to be effaced all placed in it programs) I no matter how was sad its personal experience, nevertheless to Caesar difficult to change themselves, and it frequently relies not on the instruction, in which it is rare and little which understands, but to the success, the luck and to its intuition despite the fact that it fairly often brings it.
The experience of strange errors also always does not produce on it a sufficient impression Caesar it can as much as desired confer and consult, but in the final analysis he will enter in its own way, despite all councils and common sense. Caesar distinguishes the exceptional ability constantly "to fill lumps" at one and the same place. Deeply to suffer, to suffer and to ask in all and each, why this every time occurs precisely with it, and what deficiencies it should in itself eliminate so that these misfortunes finally would cease they be required colossal patience and endurance (qualities, inherent in its dualu to Balzac) in order to train Caesar to analyze the experience of past errors, i.e. the very thing, what Caesar, in spite of the desire of those surrounding, to make decisively rejects (and you do not request, and do not persuade!) It entered and enters only, as it will deem necessary to it, but otherwise it simply cannot be itself itself.
For Caesar the need for thoroughly thinking over its behavior, behaving prudently presents serious problem and it is reasonable. Observations in the illogicality of its own actions it does not transfer the requirement to be sequential in its actions is derived it from itself. For it to characteristically act wisely and logically only until this from it they require, until they respect it also they are considered it. But it is worthwhile to only accentuate attention in its illogicality, as all its actions immediately they cease logically to be checked and acquire the nature of disorderly, panicky fuss.
The charges of Caesar in the illogicality only aggravate his problems. Itself Caesar very painfully transfers any criticism in his address, and since requirements for themselves in it are sufficiently overstated, to it it is difficult to recognize with the presence of all its merits this deficiency as faulty logic. Caesar it generally is desirable to be man without the deficiencies. (A whom of this it does not want?) Therefore Caesar greatly survives, when they give low estimation to his mental abilities. To it it is very difficult to allow itself not to be cleverest (although this is better, that it can for itself make).
It must be noted that to Caesar to more easily be sequential and logical in its behavior after it was dismantled at the possibilities of situation (sequence of the work of function). For Caesar to enter reasonably - this means to enter wisely, i.e. it is farsighted, it is foresighted. The more thorough it will be informed on the aspect "intuition of possibilities", the easier to it to enter logically produmanno.
In a word, so that in behavior of Caesar there would be less than contradictions and fuss, it is necessary to place him in the specific psychological regime, in which it will obtain a sufficient information by intuition of the possibilities, support by intuition of time and that is very important, the absence of criticism on the aspect of the logic of relationships. I.e., the psychological support of Balzac is necessary for Caesar. Its skill to show the prospects for situation in such form that they would not frighten and would not plunge Caesar into panic, to show the possible reserve of time in order to distract it from the fuss and to create it conditions for the thorough logical analysis. Balzac knows how to find the simplest and most accessible to understanding forms explanation. He is very methodical in his explanations, he knows how to illustrate by their successful examples. It knows how to bring collocutor to the necessary logical conclusion, letting it very be glad at its own discovery.
Block OF SUPERID*SHCH-YA pozitsiya*Suggestivnaya function * the "intuition of time"
Caesar does not hide his problems on this aspect. Yes even as them you will hide, when and so it is clear that time with its entire exceptional activity to it never it is sufficient. And from where to it to undertake, if one takes into account the ability of Caesar to simultaneously begin many matters, each of which requires the high expenditures of time and labor.
The attempt to be concentrated on what it should now make and how long this will engage, costs Caesar big enough stress. Therefore it prefers generally about this not to think: makes that which now wants it, and it expends on this as much time, as that requires the matter. He tries to work rapidly, it prefers not to get stuck in some stage of work in order to have time to make as much as possible, he tries not to complicate to itself work. If some vaguenesses appear, Caesar is thrown to another matter. Main thing for it - always to advance, not zastrevaya on the specific problems.
Being fascinated by the process of work. Caesar does not frequently note its lack of promise. Therefore he sometimes fears to think about that which will be further or which will occur then. To Caesar to more easily live by present day, without a moment's hesitation about the future. Although for it it is necessary dearly to pay subsequently for today's lightness, it prefers to see in its future only that which desires for itself. Therefore it accepts information about the possible problems very unwillingly despite the fact that realizes entire its importance.
Caesar greatly does not love to await. To him this is improbably difficult - it is too active and therefore it is too impatient. It it wants in all now and it is faster. It may happen that it to still and there is no time think or simply does not be desirable to expend the time on the reflections. Balzac assigns to it the measured off vital rate, learns it to live according to the principle "pospeshay slowly". It cools the exorbitant ardour of Caesar, calms him: "time will give answers to all questions", "time everything will arrange on the places". And by precisely this "explanation" Caesar exactly is suggested. In it suddenly appears the desire (but sometimes also curiosity) to patiently "see to the end" how all this it will end.
Sometimes Caesar reflects about that, "correctly" he now lives or "it is incorrect". As its today's behavior they will be reflected in its future fate and that it must change now so that in the future for it everything would be formed satisfactorily.
By themselves reflections on this theme for it are very tiresome and unhealthy. Therefore it prefers to in advance obtain finished information on this aspect. Sometimes in it appears the desire "to introduce order" in its today's life in order to prepare to itself satisfactory future. Then it becomes necessary the analysis of the consequences of each its step and each action. To Caesar it is important to know that with it it will occur after it will undertake one or other step or another. (for it is actually frequently necessary the instruction: "you will go to the right - horse you will lose...")
By nature itself to it it is granted for this similar of dual as Balzac. No one better it will know how to predict further outcome of events depending on various circumstances. Necessary to only describe to Balzac "which was", and "which will be and how heart it will be quieted", it will already describe itself.
From Balzac Caesar can obtain precise information about the opportuneness and expediencies of any his undertaking, obtain idea about the consequences of each his action, see the reflection of his today's behavior in the distant and near future.
This information for Caesar is always valuable and urgent, but Balzac in this question does not have equal. Reasonable, farsighted and foresighted Caesar can be only because of the timely warnings and the forecasts of Balzac.
Block OF SUPERID*'-YA the pozitsiya*Aktivatsionnaya funktsiya"*"Delovaya logic "
Caesar - man of exceptional business activity and fitness for work. It is exceptionally hardy, zealous. With the readiness it starts on any work, without considering the expenditures of time and forces. If they require the circumstance of that, it starts also on the physically hard work, associated with the dangers and the difficulties.
For Caesar, as for any representative of third kvadry it is very important to realize its creative potential, it is important to realize vostrebovannost' of its labor. Therefore Caesar is very activated, undertaking the concretely feasible matter. And the more to it is intelligible the method of its fulfillment, the greater the enthusiasm and it manifests activities.
Caesar frequently produces the impression of man, whom everything cans. Actually, it sufficiently rapidly masters new specialties - are more precise, new crafts. Moreover, once mastered by it no longer is forgotten. Actively using his many-sided abilities and talents, Caesar easily finds possibility for the additional and easy earnings. Caesar always "and shvets, and reaper, and on dude of igrets". Whatever practical work it undertook, everything makes rapidly, easily, as if igrayuchi.
Caesar is set in operation very actively, very process of his work draws more than preparation for it. Discussing about the fulfillment some of work, it advances possible versions in the hope, which someone from the side will select best and will undertake its realization, but, after entering into the work, it prefers no longer to reflect about the different versions: develops that, which first came to mind.
To the criticism of its errors it relates painfully, but it is happy, when its work in terms of something differ significantly from others. It does not love to scrupulously check the results of work - it prefers so that for it this the competent and reliable partner, who will verify, would make, and it will quiet, and it will make useful observations. The need for studying its details frequently suppresses and irritates. Time is not sometimes allowed oneself thoroughly to be dismantled at the theoretical material - it prefers to examine the process of work, being simultaneously advised in each stage, which causes he has difficulties. It is interested in the essential, design observations. With the considerable attention it will listen councils apropos of the rational fulfillment of its work, but greatly it does not love, when they criticize eventual result. To it it is convenient to work employing the clearly developed and easily memory procedures.
In private life it is sufficiently practical, cans rationally news economy. With the interest it listens information about the methods of the successful investment of money, about the possibility to make advantageous acquisition. In this question for it there is no more valuable consultant than his dual Balzac, who will always warn Caesar against unreasonable money expenditures, it will not give to it to be absorbed in by any adventurous project, it will dissuade it from the too rapid and therefore the doubtful method of enrichment. From Balzac Caesar obtains for each question the clear information: that it is necessary to make, in what sequence it is necessary this to make generally.
On the base of this information in Caesar appears the confidence into the correctness of its actions, the sensation of rest and order in the life, understanding of the fact that its forces and energy are expended reasonably and tselenapravlenno.
Block ID*"-ya Position * Observant Function *" sensorika Of sensations "
Never will allow himself Caesar to appear worse than others. It always cans itself effective to present, although it relates sufficiently nagging and critically to its exterior view.
Independent of the level of its incomes. Caesar dresses with the taste. Frequently has its own, sometimes sufficiently extravagant, the style, with which there can be it itself in the depth of soul and it is not agreeable, but it considers it necessary it to adhere to in order to have the capability to focus attention on itself. Caesar outwardly attempts differ significantly from others: he considers the brightness of his appearance an indispensable condition of his own success.
Comfort and everyday conveniences Caesar considers an indispensable condition of normal existence. In the organization of its own way of life it is guided first of all by the requirement of optimum conveniences. To the formulation of way of life it relates without the special snobbery: cleanliness, cosiness, convenience - its basic aesthetical criteria. Of course in its house everything must be not worse than in others.
Aesthetics for Caesar - sphere of the realization of his numerous talents and abilities. It has the sufficiently clear and specific aesthetical criteria, although many they seem questionable. Aesthetically Caesar always logichel, its artistic style is always justified. Eccentricity for Caesar is not more than the method of creative self expression.
Skill - field, where the creative successes of Caesar are most noticeable and find the brightest and complete expression. Here it most of all is approached excellent job and precisely here its craftsmanship deservedly obtains appreciation.
High physical activity and endurance is characteristic of Caesar. It prefers not to sosredotachivat'sya on the problems of its health. Active, saturated by impressions leisure loves.
It is very life-loving. Its love of life with the surplus is sufficient both to it very and to its duala of Balzac. Under no circumstances Caesar does not lose natural optimism and taste for life.
Block ID*8-YA pozitsiya*Demonstrativnaya function * the "ethics of emotions"
The emotions of Caesar first of all subconsiously shape his manipulation ethics of relations. I.e., emotions are expressed precisely such, such as, in the opinion of Caesar, this situation requires.
For this very reason Caesar expresses always necessary (, in addition, in his opinion) emotional relation to proceeding. If in it holiday, which means, by all it is necessary to be cheered, and it the first will try to raise the overall mood. (although it does not always consider itself as that obligated to take to itself the role of mass organizer- joker.) If some problem, which means, of joke to the side, and it the first with the characteristic of it emotional pressure will try to accelerate its permission.
Caesar magnificently knows how to solve his problems by emotional action (as any of ethics). But since the measure for its action realizes subconsiously and is oriented to the problematic emotionalism of Balzac, emotional action of Caesar always not too serious and not not very dramatic. This of its kind the ethical game, which expresses necessary at the given moment emotional pulse.
Caesar considers himself sufficiently strong person in order very to manage its own problems. Therefore its emotional action on the partner is not the signal of the extremality of situation (as, for example, in Hugo) - this is only form of his emotional manipulation by the partner: from one side, itself to recharge, with another - partner to swing. (A of its dual Balzac emotionally "swings" very heavily.)
Of the emotions of Caesar (especially at the young age) is characteristic such "children's exaggeration". Frequently their expression is anticipated by the enthusiastic or frightened exclamations. Sometimes Caesar uses emotional flow in the case of the impossibility to thoroughly explain anything: "ah, well as you so can! Oy, well as you do not understand! However, well that this such!"
At the ripe age the emotions of Caesar are more greatly subordinated to the system of his relations, and they are already more rarely the method of the independent expression of its moods. In any case, the life experience (and also successful dualization) trains Caesar to be more carefully and sderzhanneye in the expression of its emotions.
Contact with Balzac, who knows how to extinguish superfluous (unjustified) ardency, goes to Caesar only for the benefit - its emotional infantilism, which actually prevents it from appearing majestic, disappears during its entire life.
The restraint of emotions, brought up by Balzac, only ennobles Caesar, it gives special significance to its statements and behavior and profitably works on its authority.