Just because. And yes, I know that I'm one industrial spill away from becoming the Joker in the third picture.
Just because. And yes, I know that I'm one industrial spill away from becoming the Joker in the third picture.
LII
You look like this guy who's considered an LII by Filatova.
![]()
LII-Ne with strong EII tendencies, 6w7-9w1-3w4 so/sp/sx, INxP
You do look a bit like DarkAngelFireWolf69 in the last pic!
Honestly though, I cant tell.
LIE based on your similarity to this guy:
![]()
What do these signs mean—,
, etc.? Why cannot socionists use symbols Ne, Ni etc. as in MBTI? Just because they have somewhat different meaning. Socionics and MBTI, each in its own way, have slightly modified the original Jung's description of his 8 psychological types. For this reason,
(Ne) is not exactly the same as Ne in MBTI.
Just one example: in MBTI, Se (extraverted sensing) is associated with life pleasures, excitement etc. By contrast, the socionic function(extraverted sensing) is first and foremost associated with control and expansion of personal space (which sometimes can manifest in excessive aagression, but often also manifests in a capability of managing lots of people and things).
For this reason, we consider comparison between MBTI types and socionic types by functions to be rather useless than useful.
-Victor DarkAngelFireWolf69, Dmitri Lytov
You look a ton like Matt Bellamy in that third photo
I conjecture Beta ST, although that's kinda weird considering how you self-type.
Either EII or just well trained LII. Rationality and introversion is highly visible in your expressions. Same as Ne eyes.![]()
Sincerely Yours,
Beyond the clouds. Beyond the sun.
The Rebel without a cause.
Stuck between INXj
ILI (FINAL ANSWER)
I need a side picture
and your age![]()
-
Dual type(as per tcaudilllg)
Enneagram 2w1sw(1w9) helps others to live up to their own standards of what a good person is and is very behind the scenes in the process.
Tritype 1-2-6 stacking sp/sx
I'm constantly looking to align the real with the ideal.I've been more oriented toward being overly idealistic by expecting the real to match the ideal. My thinking side is dominent. The result is that sometimes I can be overly impersonal or self-centered in my approach, not being understanding of others in the process and simply thinking "you should do this" or "everyone should follor this rule"..."regardless of how they feel or where they're coming from"which just isn't a good attitude to have. It is a way, though, to give oneself an artificial sense of self-justification. LSE
Best description of functions:
http://socionicsstudy.blogspot.com/2...functions.html