Your use of seeing is more a product of how your conscious functions are aligned. ^_^
As for the imaginary story, the facts of the bachelor's marriage is not being processed byin fact, it's can be many factors such as unreliable narrator, a imaginary world where the logic of marriage and bachelorhood isn't recognized, or simply a bachelor of whatever degree the character holds. The factors that would make this marriage a rational and extroverted would be some sort of formal and official recognization by a religious or state institution within the context of the story. This is a measurable quantity even within the story.
Your base function is a extroverted perceptive function so you have a predisposition to think in that way. Your example is actually a extroverted perceptive means of characterizing marriage along with rationality. However there is no legitimacy of the statements being made, there is no body to make the perceptions you make substantiated. The story might be inconsistent, but since there is no proof of marriage within your example, there is no marriage. It's best to take this outside of a imaginary world and into the real one as a example, but it works either way
A marriage certificate could also easily fall into extroverted ethics as not all marriage certificate are acceptable in all areas of the world and is only a product of collective human relations.
It's important to recognize the difference in cognition in extroverted perception and extroverted rationality and your communication style is a good example. For you, reading/seeing/observing is enough to establish fact or at least you view it as enough to establish a objective "enough" perceptive, however extrovert rationality requires more that that, it requires some sort of measurable construct. I want to also note that this construct can be fraudulent, coerced, or the rationalization a delusion, however it's legitimacy is established via a measurable. It's legitimacy can also change due to a change in the measurable.
I'm not going to go too much deeper into this, but in a lot of ways you are making a simple mistake of describing something you can't easily consciously verbalized based on your ego functions. It's actually quite difficult to verbalize especially when the topic is often related and require mutual use to form a complete picture.



in fact, it's can be many factors such as unreliable narrator, a imaginary world where the logic of marriage and bachelorhood isn't recognized, or simply a bachelor of whatever degree the character holds. The factors that would make this marriage a rational and extroverted would be some sort of formal and official recognization by a religious or state institution within the context of the story. This is a measurable quantity even within the story.
Reply With Quote
