-
Ti centric
i see statics as controlling of their fate in initiative taking, agentive ways, whereas dynamics are in a sense more reactive to external events.
this last thing does not in any way mean powerless. the reaction is often one where the triggering influence is redirected in ways that leaves the person in much better position than before. but there is less of a "willed" precursor to the action. more of a sense of necessity in the fending off of outside impulses.
...
it also merits pointing out that the initiative of statics can be plainly stupid in ways that don't make it command any kind of "control" over events. the static can cry out "i want X" all day long, but that doesn't mean the world at large will cater to the wish. it isn't a matter of effects so much as one of the initial attitude in approaching situations and environments; whether to approach it with or without an initial sense of where in the map of stochastic possibility one wants to end up.
the explanation for this is that statics work with spatial maps, which are multidimensional and confer a sense of "where" much like in "where i want to be", whereas dynamics work mainly with temporal relations, which concern mostly how one situation follows another and what attitude is most suitable in anticipation of it.
smilingeyes also saw it much like this, if i remember properly.
Last edited by krieger; 07-28-2013 at 03:40 PM.
Tags for this Thread
Posting Permissions
- You may not post new threads
- You may not post replies
- You may not post attachments
- You may not edit your posts
-
Forum Rules