I´ve been thinking of ISTP as possible lately.
Your comments are welcome.
I´ve been thinking of ISTP as possible lately.
Your comments are welcome.
Because you relate more to Si than Te? I'm wondering, how clear this conception is, and if it's really useful.
doubt you are SLI, too confrontation focused
dude, realistically, if you are a 1 on enneagram you are probably LSI
I dont really agree with delta for you
I dont know too much about you to be able to call for sure, but how cemented are you on enneagram?
<Crispy> what subt doesnt understand is that a healthy reaction to "FUCK YOU" is and not
lol @ the multiple type names
I don't know what type he is but he kind of irks me, and he reminds me of Tom.
But, for a certainty, back then,
We loved so many, yet hated so much,
We hurt others and were hurt ourselves...
Yet even then, we ran like the wind,
Whilst our laughter echoed,
Under cerulean skies...
You seem a bit too outstandingly judgemental in a vocal way, ... in a sort of rational way.
What is pointing to SLI?
Probably not your 1w9ness. . .
He reminds me nothing of you. You are rigid, brusque, and minimalistic, being distant and formal in communication; he is expansive, gregarious, and playful, and is largely informal in communication.
But, for a certainty, back then,
We loved so many, yet hated so much,
We hurt others and were hurt ourselves...
Yet even then, we ran like the wind,
Whilst our laughter echoed,
Under cerulean skies...
I find that your analysis of me being 2w1 (1w9) very detailed and thorough and I've also noticed in that argument as with all arguments you choose, you tend to do what LSE do best, which is to pick a point and argue it well. I don't know if that helps; you're very receptive to Fi, but at the same time, it does not activate you, as in, the posts I make where I emphasize on Fi, these posts do not attract your attention, just like they don't attract other LSE on the forum. You and RYU, in the Delta Lounge, previously, were very receptive to offering the same answer on an issue about aggressive sex topic that I was concerned about, that response gave me the Fi mimicker and feed to confirm you as LSE type. I have tested you throughout without mentioning it to you, but the above is just one example of my previous test. I will not share the others, as they are my secrets.
-
Dual type (as per tcaudilllg)
Enneagram 5 (wings either 4 or 6)?
I'm constantly looking to align the real with the ideal.I've been more oriented toward being overly idealistic by expecting the real to match the ideal. My thinking side is dominent. The result is that sometimes I can be overly impersonal or self-centered in my approach, not being understanding of others in the process and simply thinking "you should do this" or "everyone should follor this rule"..."regardless of how they feel or where they're coming from"which just isn't a good attitude to have. It is a way, though, to give oneself an artificial sense of self-justification. LSE
Best description of functions:
http://socionicsstudy.blogspot.com/2...functions.html
LSE do give optimistic advice, usually to help their suspicious (paranoid and overly concerned) duals out.
-
Dual type (as per tcaudilllg)
Enneagram 5 (wings either 4 or 6)?
I'm constantly looking to align the real with the ideal.I've been more oriented toward being overly idealistic by expecting the real to match the ideal. My thinking side is dominent. The result is that sometimes I can be overly impersonal or self-centered in my approach, not being understanding of others in the process and simply thinking "you should do this" or "everyone should follor this rule"..."regardless of how they feel or where they're coming from"which just isn't a good attitude to have. It is a way, though, to give oneself an artificial sense of self-justification. LSE
Best description of functions:
http://socionicsstudy.blogspot.com/2...functions.html
I have all the 4 ST types into consideration although I don´t look like an ESTp, really, more like an ISTj if I am Beta.
But then there´s a question, why do I focus so much no Si if I´m supposedly totally unconscious of this function, it´s deep in my Id.
It´s more reasonable to think either ESTj or ISTp since these are types with Si on the Ego block. I thought ISTp after reading this description of an ISTp which pretty much fits me well, as well as seeing how much I do value Si:
Socionics Description: The Best ISTP Guide Ever Written - PersonalityCafe
My concept of is :
Physical and mental comfort, states of well-being primarily physical, importance to that. I hardly disregard my physical well-being for some reason. Once a week I have to do physiotherapy to treat a mild scoliosis which nevertheless makes my spinal column hurt like hell if I leave it for some weeks. It´s boring and tiring but I have to do it. I value also comfort such as pleasant audio, pleasant textures of clothes which feel well in my skin. These are the things I look for when I buy some clothing, it´s always how they feel that is more important than their look or anything else, although I also value good-looking clothes.
My pleasure in audio and my indulgence in this pleasure with big earphones for a better sound are also to me a sign of Si.
Along with that, I also interpret a lot people based on their facial expressions, gestures and body language in general. I´m very aware of body language.
Is this not Si? If so then there´s no such thing as Si.
My current top wish:
Pics
But, for a certainty, back then,
We loved so many, yet hated so much,
We hurt others and were hurt ourselves...
Yet even then, we ran like the wind,
Whilst our laughter echoed,
Under cerulean skies...
No, I'm saying post some pictures of yourself.
But, for a certainty, back then,
We loved so many, yet hated so much,
We hurt others and were hurt ourselves...
Yet even then, we ran like the wind,
Whilst our laughter echoed,
Under cerulean skies...
Hmm. Well you are definitely a logical type. My tentative suggestion is SLI-Te.
But, for a certainty, back then,
We loved so many, yet hated so much,
We hurt others and were hurt ourselves...
Yet even then, we ran like the wind,
Whilst our laughter echoed,
Under cerulean skies...
Are you sure you're not a 9w8?
But, for a certainty, back then,
We loved so many, yet hated so much,
We hurt others and were hurt ourselves...
Yet even then, we ran like the wind,
Whilst our laughter echoed,
Under cerulean skies...
You're probably D or C sub.
But, for a certainty, back then,
We loved so many, yet hated so much,
We hurt others and were hurt ourselves...
Yet even then, we ran like the wind,
Whilst our laughter echoed,
Under cerulean skies...
Hmm. I've never thought that 1 and SLI go well together. What about 5w6/6w5?
But, for a certainty, back then,
We loved so many, yet hated so much,
We hurt others and were hurt ourselves...
Yet even then, we ran like the wind,
Whilst our laughter echoed,
Under cerulean skies...
I kinda still thought you were beta, but your pictures look LSE.
Not a rule, just a trend.
IEI. Probably Fe subtype. Pretty sure I'm E4, sexual instinctual type, fairly confident that I'm a 3 wing now, so: IEI-Fe E4w3 sx/so. Considering 3w4 now, but pretty sure that 4 fits the best.
Yes 'a ma'am that's pretty music...
I am grateful for the mystery of the soul, because without it, there could be no contemplation, except of the mysteries of divinity, which are far more dangerous to get wrong.
no way... maybe I´m just LSE-Si and that´s it. I can relate well to Ni-PoLR. I don´t have any notion of time, I have to keep a watch otherwise I completely lose myself in time, my estimation of time is very poor.
I think Maritsa was right, I am ESTJ-Si , Harmonizing subtype or Dominant subtype.
thanks for sharing your thoughts Chris. you´re one of the people I kind of like in this forum. I´m not a beta, I can see that very clearly. What kind of beta does not have any beta value? I think just because I´m a little more intense and confrontational than my quadra peers it doesn´t mean I´m not delta. In fact I love peace, but I do have volcanic outbursts for small reasons which is something typical of LSEs according to various members here.
If you're sure you relate more to Ni-PoLR than Fe-PoLR
go with Si-LSE
are you more attracted to IJs or EPs?
Removed at User Request
I still say Beta ST and have already given my reasons for it before
EII INFj
Forum status: retired
For me it has become quite obvious in the past few days that I´m LSE, but any opinion is welcome.
Where are the picturess