Lots of you seem to think that I am not INTp. So, lets pretend I am not for a second. The topic is open to debate.
Lots of you seem to think that I am not INTp. So, lets pretend I am not for a second. The topic is open to debate.
ESTj. No doubt about it.
Yeah, just look at the feet.Originally Posted by Aleesha
http://forum.socionix.com
I don't see what's so important about the possibility of extraterrestrial life. It's just more people to declare war on.
EVERYONE PLZ CONTINUE TO UPLOAD INFINITE AMOUNT OF PICS OF "CUTE" CATS AND PUPPIES. YOU KNOW WE GIVE A SHIT!!
Okay, now seriously.
You seem pretty INTp to me...
6w5 sx
model Φ: -+0
sloan - rcuei
Totally. I think she'd make a pretty good ESFp, though
6w5 sx
model Φ: -+0
sloan - rcuei
Hey it's a nice vag.
If you weren't INTp, which I think you are, INFp would be my best guess. I still have a hard time seeing Fe as your PoLR considering how well you manipulate other's emotions. Perhaps you don't have as much control over it as you make it look like you do.
Supposing for a moment that you're not (which I don't think it's true), the only other type is INFp.
Obsequium amicos, veritas odium parit
Come on now, you're the biggest INTP on here.
With that said, Isha is not one.
Originally Posted by Rocky
Originally Posted by Aleesha
What in the world would make you doubt your type?
Originally Posted by Rocky
Have you read any of my various threads about Logic/Ethic, or my latest type thread?
You're just very strongly Ni. Maybe you haven't cared to use your Judging side much? Like, some sort of Ni-Se-Ne-Si type? Maybe not. But I think maybe you are just uncomfortable with your Judgment so you are doubting it? All I can say is that it is pretty clear to most everyone else even if it isn't clear to you, which is why people have hijacked threads recently to tell you that you are NOT INTP. Remember the eyes thread you started? Perfect INFP.
I wouldn't say perfect. As I said, have you read my threads?Originally Posted by Rocky
I think I've posted in a couple of 'em.
Besides, isn't my kind of hysterical and paranoid?
edit: and infantile?
Well, yeah, but where is the Te either? That's what I was talking about... you just don't seem to show much control over your judgment overall. As for me, I could see that if I don't "watch" myself my Te can get a little out of control (throwing my opinions in people's faces, criticizing people who don't agree with me, arguing, calling people stupid, getting reactionary, etc...), but I try not to let that happen anymore. I think its just a skill for Perceivers to work on controlling their Judgment and Judgers to control their Perception.Originally Posted by Aleesha
EDIT: either that or all Judging funcitons are hard to control (because that's the emotional side).
What about sensitivity to criticism?
Everyone's sensitive to criticism.
I meant the specific sensitivity.
i don't think shes having it
LII
that is what i was getting at. if there is an inescapable appropriation that is required in the act of understanding, this brings into question the validity of socionics in describing what is real, and hence stubborn contradictions that continue to plague me.
my posts have an authority now
LII
that is what i was getting at. if there is an inescapable appropriation that is required in the act of understanding, this brings into question the validity of socionics in describing what is real, and hence stubborn contradictions that continue to plague me.
Nice avatar
Not so much that I'm not having it, I just think there are things that still don't make sense. Rocky is doing much more than everyone else on the INFp side and I appreciate that.
why do you appreciate that?
LII
that is what i was getting at. if there is an inescapable appropriation that is required in the act of understanding, this brings into question the validity of socionics in describing what is real, and hence stubborn contradictions that continue to plague me.
if anyone doesnt like the avatar i will change it
LII
that is what i was getting at. if there is an inescapable appropriation that is required in the act of understanding, this brings into question the validity of socionics in describing what is real, and hence stubborn contradictions that continue to plague me.
Because he's actually putting some thought into it instead of merely asserting his opinion.
i see. that is not you in the avatar is it?
LII
that is what i was getting at. if there is an inescapable appropriation that is required in the act of understanding, this brings into question the validity of socionics in describing what is real, and hence stubborn contradictions that continue to plague me.
SorryOriginally Posted by Mariano Rajoy
I "borrowed" it from an avatar site.
i didn't think it was. i have already told you what type i think you are, and why i think it. vague's posts might be good to look at though.
LII
that is what i was getting at. if there is an inescapable appropriation that is required in the act of understanding, this brings into question the validity of socionics in describing what is real, and hence stubborn contradictions that continue to plague me.
I like vague, though she seems a bit of an enigma to me.
indeed
LII
that is what i was getting at. if there is an inescapable appropriation that is required in the act of understanding, this brings into question the validity of socionics in describing what is real, and hence stubborn contradictions that continue to plague me.