LOL at some of the ILI photos:
They don't call ILI the critic for nothing:
A female niffy!
LOL at some of the ILI photos:
They don't call ILI the critic for nothing:
A female niffy!
LII-Ne with strong EII tendencies, 6w7-9w1-3w4 so/sp/sx, INxP
These have always proved useful, along with the excellent descriptions at socioniko.
My Russian Twin
This guy looks fuggin hilarious next to the other SLE's.
ILI (FINAL ANSWER)
God, there are a lot of unattractive Russians.
Not a rule, just a trend.
IEI. Probably Fe subtype. Pretty sure I'm E4, sexual instinctual type, fairly confident that I'm a 3 wing now, so: IEI-Fe E4w3 sx/so. Considering 3w4 now, but pretty sure that 4 fits the best.
Yes 'a ma'am that's pretty music...
I am grateful for the mystery of the soul, because without it, there could be no contemplation, except of the mysteries of divinity, which are far more dangerous to get wrong.
lol yeah
"Language is the Rubicon that divides man from beast."
Russians are generally very attractive, at least the women. I know, cuz we have a lot of them in my country.
But I don't think it's about nationality. They are simply ordinary pictures, taken without styling. And in the 70ties.
But I like them.
I agree with warrior-librarian on the ILI guy. He deserves to be called a critic.
They dont look like typical russian people, they are more like crazy 70's university type of people who you never see on the streets, I mean God, just look at the glasses of those people .
Looking for an Archnemesis. Willing applicants contact via PM.
ENFp - Fi 7w6 sp/sx
The Ineffable IEI
The Einstein ENTp
johari nohari
http://www.mypersonality.info/ssmall/
"Face structure" have no relation to Jung types. Behavior has, including nonverbal behavior.
Impressions from that guy are close to LSI. Filatova did many mistakes in types as anyone, so ~50% can to have other types. By a single photo is doubtful to check a type with high accuracy, but general situation should to exist.
The idea of such galleries is to give data for "general impression". For this is enough that most would have the needed type. At least some of traits would be correct for most examples to understand those traits in nonverbal behavior.