Here, a whole bunch of NT's

[drake]

http://web.comlab.ox.ac.uk/oucl/peop...ic_photos.html

Look at the photos. I say that all are from NT club. You find an imposter .

[FDG]

http://web.comlab.ox.ac.uk/oucl/peop...g.gottlob.html

[Phaedrus]

Is there something interesting in his personal information profile, FDG? I can't view it for some reason.

[FDG]

He asked if we could find any impostor...and I think that guy is ESTp.

[Ave]

yeah because every smart person is automatically an NT.

[Rocky]

http://web.comlab.ox.ac.uk/oucl/peop....mckeever.html

[Phaedrus]

He asked if we could find any impostor...and I think that guy is ESTp.

I'm not sure about ESTp, but I agree that he is probably not an NT. However, why can't I read the personal information? Can you do it?

[FDG]

yeah because every smart person is automatically an NT.

Probably, here you have to count the HUGE NERD COMBO OF:

Smart+interested in computer+interested in academia

[FDG]

http://web.comlab.ox.ac.uk/oucl/peop....mckeever.html

I'd say that he might be ENTj. Not sure.

Phaedrus: Yeah. I don't know why you cant.

[Ave]

yeah because every smart person is automatically an NT.

Probably, here you have to count the HUGE NERD COMBO OF:

Smart+interested in computer+interested in academia

I got the joke, but if you're gonna do a parody make it a little more cliché and cheesy sounding. :wink:

[Joy]

I'm not saying that he's not an NT. I'm saying he's hot.

[Kristiina]

I'm not saying that he's not an NT. I'm saying he's hot.

lol. Yeah!
Although he was the one that I would have pointed out as a not-NT. Maybe he's just a very amused NT.

[Joy]

I say he's ENTp <3

"Software Engineering..." heh

[drake]

Good answers.

http://web.comlab.ox.ac.uk/oucl/work/steve.mckeever/

Btw, this guy does look like kind of ?ST?, but when you read his work related stuff, you find:
"MSc in Advanced Methods in Software Engineering", "I have used such methods for the design and implementation of:
provably-correct compiler generators
hardware development tools based on imperative and declarative languages
partial evaluation of hardware languages".

Not many STs have ideas about compilers unless they try them out and see every step how they work. This guy could be INTJ.

[Kristiina]

I say he's ENTp <3

"Software Engineering..." heh

yeah, that does seem plausible. The most easy-going NT. No wonder he's smirking. Seems like a happy person.

[mike_INTJ]

http://web.comlab.ox.ac.uk/oucl/people/academic_photos.html

Look at the photos. I say that all are from NT club. You find an imposter .

i like Dr. Hanno - especially that he lectures. looks like a mug shot.

prof. bill - has that spock eye thing going on.

dr. andrew looks fun.

if i were to guess at who isn't an NT - i would say Richard Bird, his smile is to real. the other's are posed smiles.

[mike_INTJ]

I'm not saying that he's not an NT. I'm saying he's hot.

just out of guy curiousity - but what makes him hot?

[Catholic Schoolboy]

Fun.

[Catholic Schoolboy]

I'm not saying that he's not an NT. I'm saying he's hot.

just out of guy curiousity - but what makes him hot?

Nothing. I find him very ugly. I also think he is INTj, in the photo of Jimmy Hugo posted all over the forum he had the exact same look on his face (although much better looking).



That guy is better.

[mike_INTJ]

I'm not saying that he's not an NT. I'm saying he's hot.

just out of guy curiousity - but what makes him hot?

Nothing. I find him very ugly. I also think he is INTj, in the photo of Jimmy Hugo posted all over the forum he had the exact same look on his face (although much better looking).



That guy is better.

ok. so out of guy curiousity - why is he better?

the only thing i can see is that the top guy has a sort of max headroom smirk. the other guy has more sincere eyes.

[Rocky]

Mike, I'm starting to think that you're Ti dominant.

[Joy]

I considered that the guy I posted a pic of could be INTj... I think it's quite likely in fact. Look at his eyes and then look at MysticSonic's in the eye thread. Regardless, he's alpha.

Sycophant, the guy you posted a pic of is one of the ugliest of the bunch (at least according to my tastes).

[Kristiina]

I'm not saying that he's not an NT. I'm saying he's hot.

just out of guy curiousity - but what makes him hot?

Nothing. I find him very ugly. I also think he is INTj, in the photo of Jimmy Hugo posted all over the forum he had the exact same look on his face (although much better looking).



That guy is better.

ok. so out of guy curiousity - why is he better?

the only thing i can see is that the top guy has a sort of max headroom smirk. the other guy has more sincere eyes.

The first guy seems so fun-loving. Prone to being positive and energetic. I like that quality in people. And he doesn't seem easily-offended, which is very important in my case (no ). Seems like the kind of guy who would brighten up the day. When I stare at the picture, he seems less and less cute, but the first impression was very good. And there is definitely something very sexy when it comes to intelligent fun-loving NTs. Gotta love em. :wink:

The other guy is ugly. When I look a bit longer, he's ok (not completely hopeless-looking), but not my type at all. The huge chin-bone makes him have the "Who's the MAN, I am!"- face. And it seems to me that the "strong"-looking guys are actually the worst! If he can't get it up once, his whole self-image will be shattered and if anyone would baby-talk, using the word "little" or "small", he will be really offended. For me, I think he has to have mighty good body-language/voice, to make me like him.

[FDG]

And it seems to me that the "strong"-looking guys are actually the worst! If he can't get it up once, his whole self-image will be shattered and if anyone would baby-talk, using the word "little" or "small", he will be really offended..

ISFj stereotype!!!

[FDG]

That guy looks exactly like a friend I wasn't able to type up until now.

[Kristiina]

And it seems to me that the "strong"-looking guys are actually the worst! If he can't get it up once, his whole self-image will be shattered and if anyone would baby-talk, using the word "little" or "small", he will be really offended..

ISFj stereotype!!!

I baby-talk ONLY when I'm being sarcastic. It's just that... well... some people can't take a joke. I normally don't baby-talk. I do it rather rarely and only with my BF. I once baby-talked only a little among friends and one of them said, " This tone of voice and attitude doesn't suit you. Stick to the real you." And I said the same thing in the "who the f*** do they think they are?!"-tone with different words than before, and the friend said, "see, much better!"

This has really happened:
"oh you poor little thing" (with the awwww tone in my voice)
reply: "Are you mocking me?!"
"I didn't mean anything by the word little!"
reply: "Then why did you say it?"

[mike_INTJ]

Mike, I'm starting to think that you're Ti dominant.

according to a recent test on http://www.cognitiveprocesses.com/
Te= 37.2
Ti=42.1


Ti seems to be the strongest, it seems i took this test a while ago as well.
but based on what i said - how come? i'm still trying to sort this stuff out...

[mike_INTJ]

I'm not saying that he's not an NT. I'm saying he's hot.

just out of guy curiousity - but what makes him hot?

Nothing. I find him very ugly. I also think he is INTj, in the photo of Jimmy Hugo posted all over the forum he had the exact same look on his face (although much better looking).



That guy is better.

ok. so out of guy curiousity - why is he better?

the only thing i can see is that the top guy has a sort of max headroom smirk. the other guy has more sincere eyes.

The first guy seems so fun-loving. Prone to being positive and energetic. I like that quality in people. And he doesn't seem easily-offended, which is very important in my case (no ). Seems like the kind of guy who would brighten up the day. When I stare at the picture, he seems less and less cute, but the first impression was very good. And there is definitely something very sexy when it comes to intelligent fun-loving NTs. Gotta love em. :wink:

The other guy is ugly. When I look a bit longer, he's ok (not completely hopeless-looking), but not my type at all. The huge chin-bone makes him have the "Who's the MAN, I am!"- face. And it seems to me that the "strong"-looking guys are actually the worst! If he can't get it up once, his whole self-image will be shattered and if anyone would baby-talk, using the word "little" or "small", he will be really offended. For me, I think he has to have mighty good body-language/voice, to make me like him.

now i'm more curious - of the guy's on that page - are there any that you would want to talk to, in a possible romantic way (as opposed talking about their lecture). i'm trying to get an average on how i should emote to someone, or try to lure people to me. since i have no skills the other way around.

[Kristiina]

Mike, I looked at all the pictures again, but well... The first guy (INTj/ENTp) is the only one I would talk to in that way.

I was also looking at the younger version of Andy Wathen, but then I saw that he's actually pretty old and reminds me of one of my teachers. PS! He looks rather ST to me.

[Rocky]

Mike, I'm starting to think that you're Ti dominant.

according to a recent test on http://www.cognitiveprocesses.com/
Te= 37.2
Ti=42.1


Ti seems to be the strongest, it seems i took this test a while ago as well.
but based on what i said - how come? i'm still trying to sort this stuff out...

For one, the way you ask questions. You look for very specific answers, "Why this guy?", "What did you mean by that?", etc... it reminds me very much of the way people like Hugo (Blake) and Dioklecian would act. Also, the way you seem to reason things is more of the TI approach I started to notice, "If I am INTJ in MBTI, then I am INTp in socionics because they both have Ni and Te functions", or something along those lines.

[Joy]

I don't use baby talk

[Creepy-Diana]

.

[Joy]

lol I baby talk to my dog. Not to my kid or partner though. Sometimes I guess I do it when I'm whining. Peter just says it's cute and laughs at me and then I feel better.

[mike_INTJ]

Mike, I looked at all the pictures again, but well... The first guy (INTj/ENTp) is the only one I would talk to in that way.

I was also looking at the younger version of Andy Wathen, but then I saw that he's actually pretty old and reminds me of one of my teachers. PS! He looks rather ST to me.

prof. Samson?

http://web.comlab.ox.ac.uk/oucl/peop....abramsky.html

[mike_INTJ]

Mike, I'm starting to think that you're Ti dominant.

according to a recent test on http://www.cognitiveprocesses.com/
Te= 37.2
Ti=42.1


Ti seems to be the strongest, it seems i took this test a while ago as well.
but based on what i said - how come? i'm still trying to sort this stuff out...

For one, the way you ask questions. You look for very specific answers, "Why this guy?", "What did you mean by that?", etc... it reminds me very much of the way people like Hugo (Blake) and Dioklecian would act. Also, the way you seem to reason things is more of the TI approach I started to notice, "If I am INTJ in MBTI, then I am INTp in socionics because they both have Ni and Te functions", or something along those lines.

if i were Te dominant - what type of questions would i ask?

[FDG]

You wouldn't ask them.


In this case, for example, you wouldn't have asked "why", you would have just said "bullshit, he looks awful!".