your dual
You've developed a dual radar..lol
your dual
You've developed a dual radar..lol
-
Dual type (as per tcaudilllg)
Enneagram 5 (wings either 4 or 6)?
I'm constantly looking to align the real with the ideal.I've been more oriented toward being overly idealistic by expecting the real to match the ideal. My thinking side is dominent. The result is that sometimes I can be overly impersonal or self-centered in my approach, not being understanding of others in the process and simply thinking "you should do this" or "everyone should follor this rule"..."regardless of how they feel or where they're coming from"which just isn't a good attitude to have. It is a way, though, to give oneself an artificial sense of self-justification. LSE
Best description of functions:
http://socionicsstudy.blogspot.com/2...functions.html
She's INFp or ISFp; is he with her?
-
Dual type (as per tcaudilllg)
Enneagram 5 (wings either 4 or 6)?
I'm constantly looking to align the real with the ideal.I've been more oriented toward being overly idealistic by expecting the real to match the ideal. My thinking side is dominent. The result is that sometimes I can be overly impersonal or self-centered in my approach, not being understanding of others in the process and simply thinking "you should do this" or "everyone should follor this rule"..."regardless of how they feel or where they're coming from"which just isn't a good attitude to have. It is a way, though, to give oneself an artificial sense of self-justification. LSE
Best description of functions:
http://socionicsstudy.blogspot.com/2...functions.html
I could be way off base but I see Seth MacFarlane and Matt Groening (Simpsons and Futrama) as being ILE's. Seth MacFarlane especially loves being an ass, but doing it in a clever and fun way so that its not offensive... Fi-PoLR with Fe>Fi. Further if you look closely you can see Si-valuing... specifically with characters like Peter who are more ISxp. Also it is typical for family guy to do these jokes where they set some hypothetical situation up or throw out an analogy and then they cut to it. This seems incredibly Ne based to me.
XSXP
I can see SLE or SLI, but SLI react differently on camera then SLE
-
Dual type (as per tcaudilllg)
Enneagram 5 (wings either 4 or 6)?
I'm constantly looking to align the real with the ideal.I've been more oriented toward being overly idealistic by expecting the real to match the ideal. My thinking side is dominent. The result is that sometimes I can be overly impersonal or self-centered in my approach, not being understanding of others in the process and simply thinking "you should do this" or "everyone should follor this rule"..."regardless of how they feel or where they're coming from"which just isn't a good attitude to have. It is a way, though, to give oneself an artificial sense of self-justification. LSE
Best description of functions:
http://socionicsstudy.blogspot.com/2...functions.html
-
Dual type (as per tcaudilllg)
Enneagram 5 (wings either 4 or 6)?
I'm constantly looking to align the real with the ideal.I've been more oriented toward being overly idealistic by expecting the real to match the ideal. My thinking side is dominent. The result is that sometimes I can be overly impersonal or self-centered in my approach, not being understanding of others in the process and simply thinking "you should do this" or "everyone should follor this rule"..."regardless of how they feel or where they're coming from"which just isn't a good attitude to have. It is a way, though, to give oneself an artificial sense of self-justification. LSE
Best description of functions:
http://socionicsstudy.blogspot.com/2...functions.html
This is what I had in mind with Fi-PoLR
[ame=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PqvTwklfZP4&feature=related]YouTube - Seth Mcfarlane introduces Family Guy[/ame]
Oh common! He's SLE; you guys are confusing the daylights out of me. HE'S SLE!
-
Dual type (as per tcaudilllg)
Enneagram 5 (wings either 4 or 6)?
I'm constantly looking to align the real with the ideal.I've been more oriented toward being overly idealistic by expecting the real to match the ideal. My thinking side is dominent. The result is that sometimes I can be overly impersonal or self-centered in my approach, not being understanding of others in the process and simply thinking "you should do this" or "everyone should follor this rule"..."regardless of how they feel or where they're coming from"which just isn't a good attitude to have. It is a way, though, to give oneself an artificial sense of self-justification. LSE
Best description of functions:
http://socionicsstudy.blogspot.com/2...functions.html
He was 2 when he started drawing; that takes some strong S
variation of movement...take that as dynamics.
NORMAL SLE don't always have to talk about themselves in socionics terms you know.
-
Dual type (as per tcaudilllg)
Enneagram 5 (wings either 4 or 6)?
I'm constantly looking to align the real with the ideal.I've been more oriented toward being overly idealistic by expecting the real to match the ideal. My thinking side is dominent. The result is that sometimes I can be overly impersonal or self-centered in my approach, not being understanding of others in the process and simply thinking "you should do this" or "everyone should follor this rule"..."regardless of how they feel or where they're coming from"which just isn't a good attitude to have. It is a way, though, to give oneself an artificial sense of self-justification. LSE
Best description of functions:
http://socionicsstudy.blogspot.com/2...functions.html
ILE, imo. Fi-polr makes sense. SLE seems off-the-bat wrong, but I haven't watched any interviews. It's not impossible. Still... alpha seems to make more sense than beta. Certainly not an Fi-valuer.
Not a rule, just a trend.
IEI. Probably Fe subtype. Pretty sure I'm E4, sexual instinctual type, fairly confident that I'm a 3 wing now, so: IEI-Fe E4w3 sx/so. Considering 3w4 now, but pretty sure that 4 fits the best.
Yes 'a ma'am that's pretty music...
I am grateful for the mystery of the soul, because without it, there could be no contemplation, except of the mysteries of divinity, which are far more dangerous to get wrong.
He is ILE, this typing is easy.
Brian Griffin is ESFj.
Somewhere I read that Seth MacFarlane and Brian are
„Man can do what he wants but he cannot want what he wants.“
– Arthur Schopenhauer
Brian's character seems like a pretty good candidate for ILI. His girlfriend for instance was an SEE probably. Don't know if anything else would fit better--he's some Fi/Te valuer for sure. He does have the Se dual-seeing adventuresome spirit where he doesn't actually accomplish much but daydreams about it, and has the kind of sentimental thoughts I associate with Ni, because they're not really all that feelly and emotional.
I used to type him alpha NT back when I didn't really have a good idea of how the types were.
Last edited by 717495; 07-27-2010 at 03:36 PM.
ILI, uh huh.. yea.. seriously?Originally Posted by Seth
Well I'm still at a phase of confusing ILI and LII because of their on-the-surface similarity, but what type do you think he is? I know she was definitely SEE.
ExTp. Not sure which. SLE is not too hard to imagine.. ILE is possible too, but usually ILEs go off on more tangents and have less obscenity / vulgarity in their humor.
Heh, I was thinking the same thing hkkmr, which is why I also thought he could be ILE.
In his interviews he doesn't show Fi polr, he's always very gracious. I say ESE, though it looks like I'm in the minority right now.
Last edited by electric sheep; 07-27-2010 at 10:10 PM.
The saddest ESFj
...
ILE.
Stan is not my real name.
After watching the videos posted in this thread, the best match I can think of is IEI. His body language is calmer and more relaxed than I would expect an ILE to be (introversion, probably IP), and he seems to be able to handle social situations easily and without stress (strong Ethics). His humour does seem Se-valuing, not just because it's crude, but because it seems to focus a lot on superficial appearances -- his joke about Celine Dion's nose, etc. In that same Harvard speech, he talks a lot about status, making jokes contrasting Harvard's high social status, to his own low social status. This again seems like a typical Beta concern.
Anyway, I'm not exactly solid on this IEI idea, but I do think Beta is a good place to start looking for his type.
Quaero Veritas.
EP's are pretty calm looking, but they can mobilize quickly and have a lot of energy. Also ILE's like to lay around and think, and not neccessary be all up in everyone's face all the time. As far as appearance, being si-dual seeking, and se-role, ILE are very appearance conscious as well as status conscious. They will often comment on issues of class, race, religionous differences, money, equality and other topics.
I dunno I'm just not seeing the Fi polr. Sure he has an offensive show, but in person he seems very tactful and socially graceful.
The saddest ESFj
...
Brian: SEI-Fe 6w7 sx/so
Peter: SLE-Ti 7w8 sp/so
Lois: ESE-Fe 2w3 sx/so
Chris: SEI-Si 4w5 so/sx
Meg: EIE-Fe 3w2 so/sp
Stewie: LIE-Ni 8w7 sx/sp
Quagmire: SEE-Se 7w6 sx/so
Joe: LSE-Si 1w2 sp/so
Cleveland: EII-Ne 9w8 sx/sp
MacFarlane seems SLE>ILE to me; even if he is super goofy, he has a kind of solidity to him that I just don't ever get from ILEs.
Also the perfect used-car-salesman smile:
Last edited by Gilly; 07-28-2010 at 05:24 PM.
But, for a certainty, back then,
We loved so many, yet hated so much,
We hurt others and were hurt ourselves...
Yet even then, we ran like the wind,
Whilst our laughter echoed,
Under cerulean skies...
Hey I got it right! I was thinking Seth is ESTp. He has that snarky, subdued manner, unable to hide what he's thinking, regardless of what the teleprompter says. Perfect as the anchor for Weekend Update.
I'd buy a used car from him. He couldn't hide what was wrong, and would rather share the joke than sell the lemon.
ISTp
SLI
Enneagram 5 with a side of wings.
Peter: Ne-ENTp
Lois: Alpha SF maybe?
Carter Pewterschmidt: Te-EXTj?
Chris: Ti-ENTp
Meg: Beta NF, thinking INFp
Stewie: Ti-ENTp
Brian: Fe-ESFj
Cleveland: Ne-INFj
Loretta: ESFj maybe
Quagmire: Se-ESTp?
Joe: Si-ESTj
Bonnie: Fi-INFj
Cleveland is as SEI as they come.
Stewie is obviously Ni creative. I think the whole being emotional + ****** thing + being a bi stereotype is supposed to make him EIE.
Upon further reflection, I'm going to change my hypothesis on McFarlane from IEI to EIE. His expressions and demeanour are more open than most IEIs, I think. And like electric sheep said, he seems too tactful and socially graceful for a Thinking type (especially in that video where he's interacting with the paparazzi, for example).
EIE would also help explain why he's being mistaken for ILE; I've noticed that Benefit pairs frequently get confused, likely due to the Demonstrative function of the Benefactor being the Base function of the Beneficiary.
Quaero Veritas.
I was also thinking ILE might be possible, but Ne-ILE, same as Peter. Wouldn't say though--stewie appears to portray somewhat more of an Se/Ni value system in this kind of show though, so I tend to lean toward EIE. He has weird moments of science and logic, especially in the beginning, almost LII-like, but portrays EIE most of the time.
This seems right.
This seems potentially true. Not sure why all the idiots in this show would be ILE... hmm, maybe McFarlane knew someone
Last edited by 717495; 08-10-2010 at 08:54 AM.
Yeah stewie is a weird and useless character on the show. He serves no purpose other than marketing as far as I'm concerned. But IMO he seems far too Ti-centered to be Fe ego, at least in the early episodes. I can see where you're coming from though with the ****** comparison.
But, for a certainty, back then,
We loved so many, yet hated so much,
We hurt others and were hurt ourselves...
Yet even then, we ran like the wind,
Whilst our laughter echoed,
Under cerulean skies...
Lois is clearly ESE-Si.
But, for a certainty, back then,
We loved so many, yet hated so much,
We hurt others and were hurt ourselves...
Yet even then, we ran like the wind,
Whilst our laughter echoed,
Under cerulean skies...
I can see Si-ESE, but I tend to go with Si-SEI because she seems more introverted/emotionally reserved, looking more for comfort and satisfaction, shows more concern for physical well-being of her family than she does the emotionality, and shares the same irrational wavelength as peter, in my opinion.
I dunno, she seems EJ to me. I could see SEI-Fe, but not IP-sub IP, she has too much energy, too much impact.
But, for a certainty, back then,
We loved so many, yet hated so much,
We hurt others and were hurt ourselves...
Yet even then, we ran like the wind,
Whilst our laughter echoed,
Under cerulean skies...
I see her having work ethic, but it doesn't really remind me a whole lot of EJ. Still though, I can see it in some daily bouts.
idk, the thing to me is, Pi-EJs usually seem more like they have tempered, controlled energy, like they are keeping something under wraps, or releasing a more insistent internal energy in sort of a parceled-out consistency, whereas Fe-IPs usually come across as having energy in spats, sort of having a natural containment and making distinct efforts to come "out" of it.
But, for a certainty, back then,
We loved so many, yet hated so much,
We hurt others and were hurt ourselves...
Yet even then, we ran like the wind,
Whilst our laughter echoed,
Under cerulean skies...